Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 18, Number 3—Summer 2004—Pages 25–46
The Capital Asset Pricing Model:
Theory and Evidence
Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French
T he capital asset pricing model (CAPM) of William Sharpe (1964) and John
Lintner (1965) marks the birth of asset pricing theory (resulting in a
Nobel Prize for Sharpe in 1990). Four decades later, the CAPM is still
widely used in applications, such as estimating the cost of capital for firms and
evaluating the performance of managed portfolios. It is the centerpiece of MBA
investment courses. Indeed, it is often the only asset pricing model taught in these
courses.1
The attraction of the CAPM is that it offers powerful and intuitively pleasing
predictions about how to measure risk and the relation between expected return
and risk. Unfortunately, the empirical record of the model is poor—poor enough
to invalidate the way it is used in applications. The CAPM’s empirical problems may
reflect theoretical failings, the result of many simplifying assumptions. But they may
also be caused by difficulties in implementing valid tests of the model. For example,
the CAPM says that the risk of a stock should be measured relative to a compre-
hensive “market portfolio” that in principle can include not just traded financial
assets, but also consumer durables, real estate and human capital. Even if we take
a narrow view of the model and limit its purview to traded financial assets, is it
1 Although every asset pricing model is a capital asset pricing model, the finance profession reserves the
acronym CAPM for the specific model of Sharpe (1964), Lintner (1965) and Black (1972) discussed
here. Thus, throughout the paper we refer to the Sharpe-Lintner-Black model as the CAPM.
y Eugene F. Fama is Robert R. McCormick Distinguished Service Professor of Finance,
Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Kenneth R. French is
Carl E. and Catherine M. Heidt Professor of Finance, Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth
College, Hanover, New Hampshire. Their e-mail addresses are �eugene.fama@gsb.uchicago.
edu� and �kfrench@dartmouth.edu�, respectively.
26 Journal of Economic Perspectives
legitimate to limit further the market portfolio to U.S. common stocks (a typical
choice), or should the market be expanded to include bonds, and other financial
assets, perhaps around the world? In the end, we argue that whether the model’s
problems reflect weaknesses in the theory or in its empirical implementation, the
failure of the CAPM in empirical tests implies that most applications of the model
are invalid.
We begin by outlining the logic of the CAPM, focusing on its predictions about
risk and expected return. We then review the history of empirical work and what it
says about shortcomings of the CAPM that pose challenges to be explained by
alternative models.
The Logic of the CAPM
The CAPM builds on the model of portfolio choice developed by Harry
Markowitz (1959). In Markowitz’s model, an investor selects a portfolio at time
t � 1 that produces a stochastic return at t. The model assumes investors are risk
averse and, when choosing among portfolios, they care only about the mean and
variance of their one-period investment return. As a result, investors choose “mean-
variance-efficient” portfolios, in the sense that the portfolios 1) minimize the
variance of portfolio return, given expected return, and 2) maximize expected
return, given variance. Thus, the Markowitz approach is often called a “mean-
variance model.”
The portfolio model provides an algebraic condition on asset weights in mean-
variance-efficient portfolios. The CAPM turns this algebraic statement into a testable
prediction about the relation between risk and expected return by identifying a
portfolio that must be efficient if asset prices are to clear the market of all assets.
Sharpe (1964) and Lintner (1965) add two key assumptions to the Markowitz
model to identify a portfolio that must be mean-variance-efficient. The first assump-
tion is complete agreement: given market clearing asset prices at t � 1, investors agree
on the joint distribution of asset returns from t � 1 to t. And this distribution is the
true one—that is, it is the distribution from which the returns we use to test the
model are drawn. The second assumption is that there is borrowing and lending at a
risk-free rate, which is the same for all investors and does not depend on the amount
borrowed or lent.
Figure 1 describes portfolio opportunities and tells the CAPM story. The
horizontal axis shows portfolio risk, measured by the standard deviation of portfolio
return; the vertical axis shows expected return. The curve abc, which is called the
minimum variance frontier, traces combinations of expected return and risk for
portfolios of risky assets that minimize return variance at different levels of ex-
pected return. (These portfolios do not include risk-free borrowing and lending.)
The tradeoff between risk and expected return for minimum variance portfolios is
apparent. For example, an investor who wants a high expected return, perhaps at
point a, must accept high volatility. At point T, the investor can have an interme-
Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French 27
diate expected return with lower volatility. If there is no risk-free borrowing or
lending, only portfolios above b along abc are mean-variance-efficient, since these
portfolios also maximize expected return, given their return variances.
Adding risk-free borrowing and lending turns the efficient set into a straight
line. Consider a portfolio that invests the proportion x of portfolio funds in a
risk-free security and 1 � x in some portfolio g. If all funds are invested in the
risk-free security—that is, they are loaned at the risk-free rate of interest—the result
is the point Rf in Figure 1, a portfolio with zero variance and a risk-free rate of
return. Combinations of risk-free lending and positive investment in g plot on the
straight line between Rf and g. Points to the right of g on the line represent
borrowing at the risk-free rate, with the proceeds from the borrowing used to
increase investment in portfolio g. In short, portfolios that combine risk-free
lending or borrowing with some risky portfolio g plot along a straight line from Rf
through g in Figure 1.2
2 Formally, the return, expected return and standard deviation of return on portfolios of the risk-free
asset f and a risky portfolio g vary with x, the proportion of portfolio funds invested in f, as
Rp � xRf � �1 � x�Rg ,
E�Rp� � xRf � �1 � x�E�Rg�,
� �Rp� � �1 � x�� �Rg�, x � 1.0,
which together imply that the portfolios plot along the line from Rf through g in Figure 1.
Figure 1
Investment Opportunities
Minimum variance
frontier for risky assets
g
s(R )
a
c
b
T
E(R )
Rf
Mean-variance-
efficient frontier
with a riskless asset
28 Journal of Economic Perspectives
To obtain the mean-variance-efficient portfolios available with risk-free bor-
rowing and lending, one swings a line from Rf in Figure 1 up and to the left as far
as possible, to the tangency portfolio T. We can then see that all efficient portfolios
are combinations of the risk-free asset (either risk-free borrowing or lending) and
a single risky tangency portfolio, T. This key result is Tobin’s (1958) “separation
theorem.”
The punch line of the CAPM is now straightforward. With complete agreement
about distributions of returns, all investors see the same opportunity set (Figure 1),
and they combine the same risky tangency portfolio T with risk-free lending or
borrowing. Since all investors hold the same portfolio T of risky assets, it must be
the value-weight market portfolio of risky assets. Specifically, each risky asset’s
weight in the tangency portfolio, which we now call M (for the “market”), must be
the total market value of all outstanding units of the asset divided by the total
market value of all risky assets. In addition, the risk-free rate must be set (along with
the prices
,Luca Grilli, Rocco Zaccagnino, Mario Balbi. 2024. EvoFolio: a
portfolio optimization method based on multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. Neural Computing
and Applications 7. . [Crossref]
9. Bo Yan, Mengru Liang, Yinxin Zhao. 2024. Market sentiment and price dynamics in weak markets:
A comprehensive empirical analysis of the soybean meal option market. Journal of Futures Markets
14. . [Crossref]
10. نننننننننن ننننننننن ننننن نننننن ننننننننن نننننن نننننن .2024 .نننننن ننننن نننن
,Tikrit Journal of Administrative and Economic Sciences 17:56, 1 .ننننننن ننننننن نننننن ننن نن
154-172. [Crossref]
11. Oktay Ozkan, Asima Saleem, Nasir Khan, Andrew Adewale Alola. 2024. Global impact of geopolitical
oil price uncertainty and associated commodity prices on clean energy stocks. Energy & Environment
1. . [Crossref]
12. Gaurav Khemka, Yifu Tang, Geoffrey J. Warren. 2024. Cascade model for Australian housing.
Australian Economic Papers 96. . [Crossref]
13. Deevarshan Naidoo, Peter Brian Denton Moores-Pitt, Joseph Olorunfemi Akande. 2024. The
exchange rates volatilities impact on the stock and real estate markets in South Africa. International
Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis 5. . [Crossref]
14. Weiqi Liu, Zuojun Wen. 2024. The Time Secret of Chinese A-Share Systematic Risk: Overnight and
Intraday. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 60:1, 99-112. [Crossref]
15. Scott Alan Carson. 2024. Independent and major equity market and commodity return sources around
the time of hydraulic fracking and horizontal drilling revolution: a differences-in-decompositions
approach. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 33:1, 26-44. [Crossref]
16. Hasan Fallahgoul, Vincentius Franstianto, Xin Lin. 2024. Asset pricing with neural networks:
Significance tests. Journal of Econometrics 238:1, 105574. [Crossref]
17. Martina Kánová, Josef Drábek, Petar Ćurić, Andreja Pirc Barčić. 2024. Quantification of Expected
Return of Investment in Wood Processing Sectors in Slovakia. Forests 15:1, 75. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1086/727370
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-024-00952-y
https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.13340
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103154
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103070
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102432
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3596
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-09456-w
https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.22490
https://doi.org/10.25130/tjaes.17.56.1.9
https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X231225303
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12337
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-10-2023-0142
https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2023.2210719
https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2022.2134126
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.105574
https://doi.org/10.3390/f15010075
18. Youssef Louraoui. 2024. Impact of COVID-19 on Factor-Based Investment Strategies in the US
Equity Market. SSRN Electronic Journal 4. . [Crossref]
19. Rana Palwishah, Muhammad Kashif, Mobeen Ur Rehman, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan.
2024. Asymmetric liquidity risk and currency returns before and during COVID-19 pandemic.
International Review of Financial Analysis 91, 102919. [Crossref]
20. Thilini V. Mahanama, Abootaleb Shirvani, Svetlozar Rachev, Frank J. Fabozzi. 2024. The Financial
Market of Indices of Socioeconomic Well-Being. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 17:1, 35.
[Crossref]
21. Pham Dan Khanh, Le Quy Duong, Pham Vu Anh. 2024. Testing multifactor asset pricing models in
the stock market. Corporate and Business Strategy Review 5:1, 117-126. [Crossref]
22. Hammad Siddiqi. 2024. Asset Pricing in the Resource-Constrained Brain. SSRN Electronic Journal
81. . [Crossref]
23. Stephen Penman. 2023. Accounting for Uncertainty. Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium,
ahead of print. [Crossref]
24. А.А. Пріщенко. 2023. ПРИЙНЯТТЯ РІШЕНЬ В ТОЧКАХ БІФУРКАЦІЇ РОЗВИТКУ ФІНАНСОВО-
ЕКОНОМІЧНИХ СИСТЕМ: ПРИЧИНИ, НАСЛІДКИ, ШЛЯХИ ЗНИЖЕННЯ НЕВИЗНАЧЕНОСТІ.
Управління змінами та інновації :8, 35-42. [Crossref]
25. Steven D. Silver, Marko Raseta. 2023. Financial market shocks and portfolio rebalancing. Managerial
Finance 11. . [Crossref]
26. Stefan Anchev, Nicha Lapanan. 2023. Investor Base Size and Underreaction-Consistent Stock Return
Anomalies. European Accounting Review 73, 1-34. [Crossref]
27. Darryl Biggar. 2023. A re-examination of the foundations of the cost of capital for regulatory purposes.
Journal of Regulatory Economics 64:1-3, 1-33. [Crossref]
28. Sama Haddad. 2023. Global Financial Market Integration: A Literature Survey. Journal of Risk and
Financial Management 16:12, 495. [Crossref]
29. Keith Davey, Raul Ochoa-Cabrero. 2023. Extended finite similitude and dimensional analysis for
scaling. Journal of Engineering Mathematics 143:1. . [Crossref]
30. Gerda Kirpson, Martti Randveer, Nicolas Reigl, Karsten Staehr, Lenno Uusküla. 2023.
Macroeconomic news and sovereign interest rate spreads before and during quantitative easing. Applied
Economics 3, 1-14. [Crossref]
31. Mazhar Farid Chishti, Rizwana Bashir, Tanja Mancinelli, Rana Tanveer Hussain. 2023. Humanoid
psychological sentiments and enigma of investment. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences
39:4, 1260-1276. [Crossref]
32. Daniel Andrei, Julien Cujean, Mungo Wilson. 2023. The Lost Capital Asset PricingModel. Review
of Economic Studies 90:6, 2703-2762. [Crossref]
33. Jan A. Kempkes, Francesco Suprano, Andreas Wömpener. 2023. An empirical evaluation of dynamic
approaches for estimating firms’ expected cost of equity capital. Financial Review 58:4, 859-886.
[Crossref]
34. Godfred Aawaar, Louis Logogye, Daniel Domeher. 2023. Equity return volatility in Africa’s stock
markets: A dynamic panel approach. Cogent Economics & Finance 11:2. . [Crossref]
35. Maya Jalloul, Mirela Miescu. 2023. Equity market connectedness across regimes of geopolitical risks:
Historical evidence and theory. Journal of International Money and Finance 137, 102910. [Crossref]
36. Georgios D. Karatzinis, Nikolaos A. Apostolikas, Yiannis S. Boutalis, George A. Papakostas.
2023. Fuzzy Cognitive Networks in Diverse Applications Using Hybrid Representative Structures.
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 25:7, 2534-2554. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4677442
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102919
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17010035
https://doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv5i1art12
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4714217
https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2022-0059
https://doi.org/10.32782/CMI/2023-8-6
https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-08-2023-0470
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2023.2265975
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-023-09463-0
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16120495
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-023-10296-1
https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2023.2287556
https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-05-2021-0100
https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdad013
https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.12350
https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2258704
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2023.102910
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-023-01564-4
37. Siyuan Tang. 2023. Price limit performance: New evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China's
ChiNext market. International Review of Financial Analysis 89, 102747. [Crossref]
38. Tilla IZSÁK, László MARÁK, Mihály ORMOS. 2023. EVALUATION OF SUPPORT VECTOR
MACHINE BASED STOCK PRICE PREDICTION. Applied Computer Science 19:3, 64-82.
[Crossref]
39. Viktor V. KURLYANDSKII, Aleksandr N. BILANENKO. 2023. Using a foreign exchange market
asset as a benchmark to assess investment risks in the stock market. Digest Finance 28:3, 271-288.
[Crossref]
40. Yuhua Yu, Carola Salvi, Maxi Becker, Mark Beeman. 2023. Solving problems with an Aha! increases
risk preference. Thinking & Reasoning 1-22. [Crossref]
41. Antony Millner, Geoffrey Heal. 2023. Choosing the Future: Markets, Ethics, and Rapprochement in
Social Discounting. Journal of Economic Literature 61:3, 1037-1087. [Abstract] [View PDF article]
[PDF with links]
42. Bart Claassen, Lammertjan Dam, Pim Heijnen. 2023. Corporate financing policies, financial leverage,
and stock returns. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance
,68, 101992. [Crossref]
43. Daniel Andrei, Henry Friedman, N. Bugra Ozel. 2023. Economic uncertainty and investor attention.
Journal of Financial Economics 149:2, 179-217. [Crossref]
44. Maurizio Montone. 2023. Beta, value, and growth: Do dichotomous risk-preferences explain stock
returns?. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 69, 100834. [Crossref]
45. Wei Liu, James Kolari, Seppo Pynnonen. The CAPM is Not Dead: It Works Better for Average Daily
Returns . [Crossref]
46. Antonio Salvi, Felice Petruzzella, Nicola Raimo, Filippo Vitolla. 2023. Transparency in the
digitalization choices and the cost of equity capital. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets 15:4,
630-646. [Crossref]
47. Jun Kyung Auh, Wonho Cho. 2023. Factor-based portfolio optimization. Economics Letters 228,
111137. [Crossref]
48. Luis R. Gómez-Mejia, Francesco Chirico, Geoffrey Martin, Massimo Baù. 2023. Best Among the
Worst or Worst Among the Best ? Socioemotional Wealth and Risk-Performance Returns for
Family and Non-family Firms Under Financial Distress. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 47:4,
1031-1058. [Crossref]
49. Jiawei Wang, Zhen Chen. 2023. Exploring Low-Risk Anomalies: A Dynamic CAPM Utilizing a
Machine Learning Approach. Mathematics 11:14, 3220. [Crossref]
50. Ke Wang, Alexander Franks, Sang-Yun Oh. 2023. Learning Gaussian graphical models with latent
confounders. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 40, 105213. [Crossref]
51. Elliot Beck, Gianluca De Nard, Michael Wolf. 2023. Improved inference in financial factor models.
International Review of Economics & Finance 86, 364-379. [Crossref]
52. Sercan Demiralay, Gaye Gencer, Erhan Kilincarslan. 2023. Risk-return profile of environmentally
friendly assets: Evidence from the NASDAQ OMX green economy index family. Journal of
Environmental Management 337, 117683. [Crossref]
53. Korean Accounting Journal 32:3, 37-67. [Crossref] .*نن نن نننن نننننن نن ننن نننن .2023 .ن نن ,ن نن
54. Mutaju Isaack Marobhe, Pastory Dickson. 2023. Bearish conditions and volatility persistence during
COVID-19 can microchip stocks weather the storm?. Review of Behavioral Finance 15:4, 511-533.
[Crossref]
55. Thomas Lindner, Jonas Puck, Giulia Stocco. 2023. Asymmetric risk perception and firm financing in
the institutional envelope. International Business Review 32:3, 102067. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102747
https://doi.org/10.35784/acs-2023-25
https://doi.org/10.24891/df.28.3.271
https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2023.2259552
https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20211675
http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdf/10.1257/jel.20211675
http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jel.20211675
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2023.101992
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2023.05.003
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2023.100834
https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.111932
https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-02-2022-0015
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111137
https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211057420
https://doi.org/10.3390/math11143220
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2023.105213
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.03.009
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117683
https://doi.org/10.24056/KAJ.2023.02.003
https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-11-2021-0235
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2022.102067
56. Daniele G. Gioia, Jacopo Fior, Luca Cagliero. 2023. Early portfolio pruning: a scalable approach to
hybrid portfolio selection. Knowledge and Information Systems 65:6, 2485-2508. [Crossref]
57. Adrian Fuhrer, Thorsten Hock. 2023. Uncertainty in the Black–Litterman model: Empirical
estimation of the equilibrium. Journal of Empirical Finance 72, 251-275. [Crossref]
58. Mao-Wei Hung, Andy Jia-Yuh Yeh. 2023. Stock market alphas help predict macroeconomic
innovations. Macroeconomic Dynamics 128, 1-35. [Crossref]
59. Sudhansu Sekhar Nanda. A Systematic Review of the Literature on Financial Applications of
Predictive Analytics 60-81. [Crossref]
60. Xunyuan Rui. 2023. Influencing factors of stock returns based on Fama–French model and intelligent
algorithm. Soft Computing 15. . [Crossref]
61. Xiaolin Sun, Jun Ma, Haifeng Guo, Hailong Liu. 2023. The dynamic impacts of skewness on the risk–
return relationship in the dry bulk spot freight rates and FFAs. Applied Economics 55:18, 1991-2004.
[Crossref]
62. Ehab Yamani. 2023. Return–volume nexus in financial markets: A survey of research. Research in
International Business and Finance 65, 101910. [Crossref]
63. Azarya Putra Ari, Jordy Siwu, Merlyn Sari Sambur, Sisilia Kristiana Kawulur. 2023. The return
response on gold and crude oil during global geopolitical issues. The Contrarian : Finance, Accounting,
and Business Research 2:1, 12-17. [Crossref]
64. Jiajing Yao. 2023. Empirical analysis on construction of mimicking factors and its effect on model
adequacy in the Fama-French three-factor model. BCP Business & Management 38, 164-174.
[Crossref]
65. Michael Hasler, Charles Martineau. 2023. Explaining the Failure of the Unconditional CAPM with
the Conditional CAPM. Management Science 69:3, 1835-1855. [Crossref]
66. Olivier Mesly. 2023. Irrational exuberance and deception — Why markets spin out of control. Journal
of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 37, 100707. [Crossref]
67. Vasco Vendrame, Cherif Guermat, Jon Tucker. 2023. A conditional higher-moment CAPM.
International Review of Financial Analysis 86, 102524. [Crossref]
68. Luyanda M.Q. Nsibande, Avani Sebastian. 2023. Is the environmental, social and corporate governance
score the missing factor in the Fama-French five-factor model?. South African Journal of Economic and
management Sciences 26:1. . [Crossref]
69. Xijing Huang, Ruizhe Zhang, Caiwei Lv, Fengyue Zhu. 2023. The Effectiveness of CAPM and Fama-
French Three-Factor Models in Healthcare and Real Estate Industries. BCP Business & Management
39, 459-468. [Crossref]
70. M Hashem Pesaran, Takashi Yamagata. 2023. Testing for Alpha in Linear Factor Pricing Models with
a Large Number of Securities. Journal of Financial Econometrics 44. . [Crossref]
71. Viet Hoang Le, Hans-Jörg von Mettenheim, Stéphane Goutte, Fei Liu. 2023. News-based sentiment:
can it explain market performance before and after the Russia–Ukraineconflict?. The Journal of Risk
Finance 24:1, 72-88. [Crossref]
72. Hardeep Singh Mundi. 2023. Risk neutral variances to compute expected returns using data from
S&P BSE 100 firms—a replication study. Management Review Quarterly 73:1, 215-230. [Crossref]
73. Ingolf Dittmann, Maurizio Montone, Yuhao Zhu. 2023. Wage gap and stock returns: Do investors
dislike pay inequality?. Journal of Corporate Finance 78, 102322. [Crossref]
74. Naga Pillada, Sangeetha Rangasamy. 2023. An empirical investigation of investor sentiment and
volatility of realty sector market in India: an application of the DCC–GARCH model. SN Business
& Economics 3:2. . [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-023-01832-7
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2023.03.009
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100523000184
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-7568-3.ch003
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-08305-7
https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2022.2100873
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.101910
https://doi.org/10.58784/cfabr.20
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v38i.3684
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4381
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100707
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102524
https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v26i1.4835
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v39i.4259
https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbad002
https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-06-2022-0168
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00236-7
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102322
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-023-00434-3
75. Ludovic Calès, Apostolos Chalkis, Ioannis Z. Emiris, Vissarion Fisikopoulos. 2023. Practical volume
approximation of high-dimensional convex bodies, applied to modeling portfolio dependencies and
financial crises. Computational Geometry 109, 101916. [Crossref]
76. Joseph Emmanuel Tetteh, Christopher Boachie. 2023. Are the saving decision patterns of bank
customers also clouded by
,psychological biases? Evidence from Ghana. Review of Behavioral Finance
15:1, 1-18. [Crossref]
77. Anton Gerunov. Standard Risk Metrics 41-79. [Crossref]
78. Konstantin B. Kostin, Philippe Runge, Leyla E. Mamedova. 2023. Validity of the Fama-French Three-
and Five-Factor Models in Crisis Settings at the Example of Select Energy-Sector Companies during
the COVID-19 Pandemic. Mathematics 11:1, 49. [Crossref]
79. Meng-Horng Lee, Chee-Wooi Hooy, Robert Brooks. 2023. A New Measure for Idiosyncratic Risk
Based on Decomposition Method. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 16:1, 43. [Crossref]
80. Jorge Armando Bedoya-Cadavid, Ángela María Lanzas-Duque, Harold Salazar. 2023. WACC for
Electric Power Transmission System Operators: The Case of Colombia. Energies 16:2, 964. [Crossref]
81. Afees A. Salisu, Idris Adediran, Philip C. Omoke, Jean Paul Tchankam. 2023. Gold and tail risks.
Resources Policy 80, 103154. [Crossref]
82. Joaquim Miranda Sarmento. Taxation in Finance 87-111. [Crossref]
83. James W. Kolari, Seppo Pynnönen. The Zero-Beta CAPM 85-104. [Crossref]
84. James W. Kolari, Seppo Pynnönen. Multifactor Models 139-154. [Crossref]
85. Pengfei Sun, Yuhui Wang, Yumu Wang. Analysis of Chinese and American Banking Stocks Based on
CAPM Model 578-586. [Crossref]
86. Massimiliano Neri. The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Dead and Kicking 209-225. [Crossref]
87. Matteo Maggiolo, Oleg Szehr. 2023. Overfitting in Portfolio Optimization. SSRN Electronic Journal
61. . [Crossref]
88. Benedicto Kulwizira Lukanima. The Cost of Equity 339-409. [Crossref]
89. Sarbjit Singh, Kulwinder Singh Parmar, Jatinder Kaur. Forecasting volatility in the stock market data
using GARCH, EGARCH, and GJR models 207-220. [Crossref]
90. Adam Patterson. Valuation Versus Pricing: A Conceptual and Practical Guide to Estimate Economic
Value for Early-Stage Companies Via DCF 67-102. [Crossref]
91. Hui Qi Zhang. The Impact of Different Phases of COVID-19 on the Airline, Financial Services, and
Healthcare Industry 1713-1721. [Crossref]
92. Volker Ziemann. Portfoliotheorie und CAPM 15-29. [Crossref]
93. Ronald Ravinesh Kumar, Peter Josef Stauvermann, Shasnil Avinesh Chand. Investment analysis based
on portfolio optimization: A case of Fiji's stock market . [Crossref]
94. Celso Brunetti, Nathan Foley-Fisher, Stephane Verani. 2023. Measuring Interest Rate Risk
Management by Financial Institutions. SSRN Electronic Journal 110. . [Crossref]
95. Álvaro Cartea, Mihai Cucuringu, Qi Jin. 2023. Correlation Matrix Clustering for Statistical Arbitrage
Portfolios. SSRN Electronic Journal 53. . [Crossref]
96. Armen V. Papazian. The Risk and Time Value of Money 11-27. [Crossref]
97. Stefan Anchev, Nicha Lapanan. 2023. Stock Market Participation and Accounting Information. SSRN
Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
98. Hwagyun Kim, John Leonardy. 2023. Beta X Forecast Dispersion. SSRN Electronic Journal 55. .
[Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comgeo.2022.101916
https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-05-2021-0094
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18100-9_2
https://doi.org/10.3390/math11010049
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16010043
https://doi.org/10.3390/en16020964
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103154
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22097-5_5
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16784-3_5
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16784-3_8
https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-054-1_63
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17414-8_18
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4483959
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28267-6_12
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821285-1.00024-5
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35291-1_4
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6441-3_153
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36964-3_3
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-44-313776-1.00141-0
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4600139
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4560455
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45689-3_2
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4379045
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4594853
99. Michael Gropper. 2023. Lawyers Setting the Menu: The Effects of Litigation Risk on Employer-
Sponsored Retirement Plans. SSRN Electronic Journal . [Crossref]
100. Gary Smith, Margaret Smith. Investing 5.0—Factor Models, Algorithms, and Chasing Alpha 85-102.
[Crossref]
101. Tom P. Davis. High Mathematics Meets High Finance 1-32. [Crossref]
102. James W. Kolari, Wei Liu, Seppo Pynnönen. Multifactor Asset Pricing Models 43-55. [Crossref]
103. James W. Kolari, Wei Liu, Seppo Pynnönen. Net Long Portfolio Performance Analyses 149-168.
[Crossref]
104. James W. Kolari, Wei Liu, Seppo Pynnönen. The Future of Investment Practice, Artificial Intelligence,
and Machine Learning 237-247. [Crossref]
105. Marco Molteni. 2023. Financial Development, Overbanking, and Bank Failures During the Great
Depression: New Evidence From Italy. SSRN Electronic Journal 72. . [Crossref]
106. Xiangqi Ma. 2022. Optimal Portfolio with Pension under Three Models: Mean-Variance, CAPM and
FF3F. BCP Business & Management 35, 723-729. [Crossref]
107. Haidar Alqadhib, Nada Kulendran, Lalith Seelanatha. 2022. Impact of COVID-19 on mutual fund
performance in Saudi Arabia. Cogent Economics & Finance 10:1. . [Crossref]
108. Daitri Tiwary, Khanindra Ch. Das, Jagdish Shettigar, Pooja Misra. 2022. Exchange Rate Volatility and
Financial Stress: Evidence from Developing Asia. Journal of Emerging Market Finance 21:4, 355-384.
[Crossref]
109. Si Ying Zhang. 2022. Are investors sensitive to climate-related transition and physical risks? Evidence
from global stock markets. Research in International Business and Finance 62, 101710. [Crossref]
110. Zhen He, Fergal O’Connor, Jacco Thijssen. 2022. Identifying proxies for risk-free assets: Evidence
from the zero-beta capital asset pricing model. Research in International Business and Finance 63,
101775. [Crossref]
111. José Clemente Jacinto Ferreira, Ana Paula Matias Gama, Luiz Paulo Fávero, Ricardo Goulart Serra,
Patrícia Belfiore, Igor Pinheiro de Araújo Costa, Marcos dos Santos. 2022. Economic Performance
and Stock Market Integration in BRICS and G7 Countries: An Application with Quantile Panel Data
and Random Coefficients Modeling. Mathematics 10:21, 4013. [Crossref]
112. Hector O. Zapata, Supratik Mukhopadhyay. 2022. A Bibliometric Analysis of Machine Learning
Econometrics in Asset Pricing. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15:11, 535. [Crossref]
113. Thorsten Hens, Fatemeh Naebi. 2022. Behavioral heterogeneity in the CAPM with evolutionary
dynamics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 32:5, 1499-1521. [Crossref]
114. Michael V Klibanov, Aleksander A Shananin, Kirill V Golubnichiy, Sergey M Kravchenko. 2022.
Forecasting stock options prices via the solution of an ill-posed problem for the Black–Scholes
equation. Inverse Problems 38:11, 115008. [Crossref]
115. Daniel Broby. 2022. The use of predictive analytics in finance. The Journal of Finance and Data Science
8, 145-161. [Crossref]
116. Harald Puhr, Jakob Müllner. 2022. Foreign to all but fluent in many: The effect of multinationality
on shock resilience. Journal of World Business 57:6, 101370. [Crossref]
117. Irene Fafaliou, Maria Giaka, Dimitrios Konstantios, Michael Polemis. 2022. Firms’ ESG reputational
risk and market longevity: A firm-level analysis for the United States. Journal of Business Research
149, 161-177. [Crossref]
118. Yundi Gao, Zhenyu Hu. 2022. The Comparison between CAPM and FF3 Model: Evidence from
America. BCP Business & Management 26, 462-467. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4393420
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45900-9_5
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19071-2_135-1
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48169-7_3
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48169-7_8
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48169-7_13
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4484184
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v35i.3376
https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2056361
https://doi.org/10.1177/09726527221078634
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101710
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101775
https://doi.org/10.3390/math10214013
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15110535
,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-022-00786-3
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/ac91ec
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfds.2022.05.003
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101370
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.010
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v26i.1997
119. Yuhao Lin, Jiacheng Qing, Xinyuan Wang. 2022. Does the Sci-Tech Innovation Board Make the
Chinese Market Better? From the Perspective of the Factor Model. BCP Business & Management 26,
580-588. [Crossref]
120. Marco Lazzarino, Jenny Berrill, Aleksandar Šević. 2022. The importance of distinguishing between
precious and industrial metals when investing in mining stocks. Resources Policy 78, 102802. [Crossref]
121. Seza Danışoğlu, Baki Cem Sahin. 2022. Ambiguity and asset pricing: An empirical investigation for
an emerging market. International Review of Financial Analysis 77, 102338. [Crossref]
122. Xiang Lin, Martin Thomas Falk. 2022. Nordic stock market performance of the travel and leisure
industry during the first wave of Covid-19 pandemic. Tourism Economics 28:5, 1240-1257. [Crossref]
123. Dafydd Mali, Hyoung-Joo Lim. 2022. Does relative (absolute) efficiency affect capital costs?. Annals
of Operations Research 315:2, 1037-1060. [Crossref]
124. Joseph Falzon, Elaine Bonnici. 2022. Does it pay to be a faithful investor? A risk-based approach
performance analysis of Islamic funds vs UCITS schemes. Islamic Economic Studies 29:2, 100-118.
[Crossref]
125. Pin-Te Lin. 2022. Intertemporal Risk-Return Relationship in Housing Markets. Journal of Real Estate
Research 44:3, 331-354. [Crossref]
126. Yen-Sheng Lee. 2022. Representative Bias and Pairs Trade: Evidence From S&P 500 and Russell 2000
Indexes. SAGE Open 12:3, 215824402211203. [Crossref]
127. James W. Kolari, Jianhua Z. Huang, Hilal Anwar Butt, Huiling Liao. 2022. International tests of the
ZCAPM asset pricing model. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 79,
101607. [Crossref]
128. Kwamie Dunbar, Johnson Owusu-Amoako. 2022. Cryptocurrency returns under empirical asset
pricing. International Review of Financial Analysis 82, 102216. [Crossref]
129. Giovanni Catello Landi, Francesca Iandolo, Antonio Renzi, Andrea Rey. 2022. Embedding
sustainability in risk management: The impact of environmental, social, and governance ratings
on corporate financial risk. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 29:4,
1096-1107. [Crossref]
130. Francesco Bravo. 2022. Misspecified semiparametric model selection with weakly dependent
observations. Journal of Time Series Analysis 43:4, 558-586. [Crossref]
131. Ron Alquist, Benjamin R. Chabot, Ram Yamarthy. 2022. The price of property rights: Institutions,
finance, and economic growth. Journal of International Economics 137, 103594. [Crossref]
132. Aidan Vining, Mark Moore, Claude Laurin. 2022. Listed public–private enterprises: stock market
information, agency costs and productive efficiency outcomes. International Journal of Public Sector
Management 35:4, 388-409. [Crossref]
133. Jessie Y. Zhu, Wally Smieliauskas. 2022. Evidence on the Economic Consequences of Marriage
Equality and LGBT Human Rights. Journal of Business Ethics 178:1, 57-70. [Crossref]
134. Lorne N. Switzer, Nabil El Meslmani, Xinkai Zhai. 2022. IPO Performance and the Size Effect:
Evidence for the US and Canada. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance 101744.
[Crossref]
135. Kam Fong Chan, Terry Marsh. 2022. Asset pricing on earnings announcement days. Journal of
Financial Economics 144:3, 1022-1042. [Crossref]
136. Muhammad Suhail Rizwan, Ghufran Ahmad, Dawood Ashraf. 2022. Systemic risk, Islamic banks, and
the COVID-19 pandemic: An empirical investigation. Emerging Markets Review 51, 100890. [Crossref]
137. Jian Zhang, Jie Li. 2022. Factorized estimation of high‐dimensional nonparametric covariance models.
Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 49:2, 542-567. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v26i.2011
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102802
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102338
https://doi.org/10.1177/1354816621990937
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04159-0
https://doi.org/10.1108/IES-03-2021-0012
https://doi.org/10.1080/08965803.2021.2011560
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221120361
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101607
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102216
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2256
https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsa.12628
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2022.103594
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-02-2021-0050
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04802-7
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2022.101744
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.06.022
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2022.100890
https://doi.org/10.1111/sjos.12529
138. Asgar Ali, Hajam Abid Bashir. 2022. Bibliometric study on asset pricing. Qualitative Research in
Financial Markets 14:3, 433-460. [Crossref]
139. Mabekebeke Segojane, Godfrey Ndlovu. 2022. An Investigation of the Beta Anomaly in Emerging
Markets: A South African Case. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15:5, 214. [Crossref]
140. Ruhana Zareen Gofran, Andros Gregoriou, Lawrence Haar. 2022. Impact of Coronavirus on liquidity
in financial markets. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 78, 101561.
[Crossref]
141. James Chong. 2022. A trading strategy with dual-beta estimates. Managerial Finance 48:5, 720-732.
[Crossref]
142. Christian-Oliver Ewald, Erik Haugom, Leslie Kanthan, Gudbrand Lien, Pariya Salehi, Ståle Størdal.
2022. Salmon futures and the Fish Pool market in the context of the CAPM and a three-factor model.
Aquaculture Economics & Management 26:2, 171-191. [Crossref]
143. Alessandra Insana. 2022. Does systematic risk change when markets close? An analysis using stocks’
beta. Economic Modelling 109, 105782. [Crossref]
144. Danny Zhao‐Xiang Huang. 2022. Environmental, social and governance factors and assessing firm
value: valuation, signalling and stakeholder perspectives. Accounting & Finance 62:S1, 1983-2010.
[Crossref]
145. Elena Shakina, Iuliia Naidenova, Angel Barajas. 2022. Shadow prices for intangible resources. Journal
of Intellectual Capital 23:3, 666-686. [Crossref]
146. Rodrigo Gonçalves Novais, Peter Wanke, Jorge Antunes, Yong Tan. 2022. Portfolio Optimization
with a Mean-Entropy-Mutual Information Model. Entropy 24:3, 369. [Crossref]
147. Jolanta Bijańska, Krzysztof Wodarski, Aneta Aleksander. 2022. Analysis of the Financing Options for
Pro-Ecological Projects. Energies 15:6, 2143. [Crossref]
148. James W. Kolari, Jianhua Z. Huang, Wei Liu, Huiling Liao. 2022. Further Tests of the ZCAPM
Asset Pricing Model. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15:3, 137. [Crossref]
149. Florin Cornel Dumiter, Florin Marius Turcaș. 2022. Theoretical and empirical underpinnings
regarding stock market forecasts and predictions. Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics
Series 32:1, 1-19. [Crossref]
150. Afees A. Salisu, Rangan Gupta, Qiang Ji. 2022. Forecasting oil prices over 150 years: The role of tail
risks. Resources Policy 75, 102508. [Crossref]
151. Alida Monaco. 2022. Divestment and greenhouse gas emissions: an event-study analysis of university
fossil fuel divestment announcements. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 72, 1-29. [Crossref]
152. Faruk Balli, Md Iftekhar Hasan Chowdhury, Anne de Bruin. 2022. Transition to Islamic equities:
Systematic risk and Shari'ah compliance. Global Finance Journal 51, 100552. [Crossref]
153. Lehlohonolo Letho, Grieve Chelwa, Abdul Latif Alhassan. 2022. Cryptocurrencies and portfolio
diversification in an emerging market. China Finance Review International 12:1, 20-50. [Crossref]
154. Vanita Tripathi, Ritu Sapra, Rishabh Gupta. 2022. Are Fama–French Factors Relevant? A Sub-
Sectorial Analysis. IIMS Journal of Management Science 13:1, 89-111. [Crossref]
155. Dandan Zheng, Shusheng Ding, Tianxiang Cui, Huan Jin. 2022. Real Economy Effects on
Consumption-Based CAPM. Mathematics 10:3, 360. [Crossref]
156. Francisco Vergara-Solana, Daniel Peñalosa-Martinell,
,Daniel Skerritt, Annie Mejaes, German Ponce-
Diaz, Fernando Aranceta-Garza, Fernando González-Laxe, Juan Carlos Seijo, U. Rashid Sumaila.
2022. Volatility and vulnerability in Mexican fisheries and aquaculture: Enhancing resilience via public
policy. Marine Policy 136, 104888. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-07-2020-0114
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15050214
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101561
https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-07-2021-0310
https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2021.1958105
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105782
https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12849
https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-02-2020-0031
https://doi.org/10.3390/e24030369
https://doi.org/10.3390/en15062143
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15030137
https://doi.org/10.2478/sues-2022-0001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102508
https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2030664
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2020.100552
https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-06-2021-0123
https://doi.org/10.1177/0976030X211052205
https://doi.org/10.3390/math10030360
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104888
157. Wen Zhang, Shaoshan Yan, Jian Li, Xin Tian, Taketoshi Yoshida. 2022. Credit risk prediction of
SMEs in supply chain finance by fusing demographic and behavioral data. Transportation Research
Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 158, 102611. [Crossref]
158. Pi-Chun Hsu, Tsai-Jung Tsai, Tsai-yi Wang. Dynamic Financial Analysis for Performance Evaluation
in the Property Insurance Industry 560-566. [Crossref]
159. Gerson de Souza Raimundo Júnior, Rafael Baptista Palazzi, Ricardo de Souza Tavares, Marcelo Cabus
Klotzle. 2022. Market Stress and Herding: A New Approach to the Cryptocurrency Market. Journal
of Behavioral Finance 23:1, 43-57. [Crossref]
160. Steven D. Silver, Marko Raseta, Alina Bazarova. 2022. Dynamics of Phase Transitions in Expectations
for Financial Markets: An Agent-Based, Multicomponent Model. Journal of Behavioral Finance 23:1,
92-105. [Crossref]
161. Steve Keen. Economic Failures of the IPCC Process 161-182. [Crossref]
162. Karolina Siemaszkiewicz. Investment in the Polish Real Estate Market – Housing “Beta” Coefficient
213-224. [Crossref]
163. Tobias Glas. An Asset Pricer’s Toolkit 7-24. [Crossref]
164. Ashenafi Fanta, Michael Graham, Daniel Asante-Amponsah. Structured Finance in Africa 373-404.
[Crossref]
165. Qingquan Tony Zhang, Beibei Li, Danxia Xie. An Introduction to Quantitative Portfolio Management
and Risk Management 3-14. [Crossref]
166. Jinhui Wei, Qingzhen Xu, Chengying He. 2022. Deep learning of predicting closing price through
historical adjustment closing price. Procedia Computer Science 202, 379-384. [Crossref]
167. Armen V. Papazian. Finance: A Value Paradigm and Equations Without Space 17-48. [Crossref]
168. Armen V. Papazian. Integrating Impact into Value 171-191. [Crossref]
169. Konstantin B. Kostin, Philippe Runge, Michel Charifzadeh. 2022. An Analysis and Comparison
of Multi-Factor Asset Pricing Model Performance during Pandemic Situations in Developed and
Emerging Markets. Mathematics 10:1, 142. [Crossref]
170. Boris Korenak, Nikola Stakić. 2022. Investment performance attribution of the U.S. small-size value
mutual funds using Fama-French five-factor model. International Review :1-2, 17-23. [Crossref]
171. Cheng Zhao, Xiaohui Liu, Jie Zhou, Yuefeng Cen, Xiaomin Yao. 2022. GCN-based stock relations
analysis for stock market prediction. PeerJ Computer Science 8, e1057. [Crossref]
172. Bill Jiang. Size Effect 103-117. [Crossref]
173. Bill Jiang. Volatility Effect 173-183. [Crossref]
174. Glen Lehman. Ontology and Reflection: The Internalist and Externalist Debate 11-18. [Crossref]
175. Glen Lehman. Thinking About the Ontology of Social and Environmental Accounting and
Management 19-31. [Crossref]
176. Thomas Sikes. 2022. Regulated Inequity: How Regulators’ Acceptance of Flawed Financial Analysis
Inflates the Profit of Public Utility Companies in the United States. SSRN Electronic Journal 52. .
[Crossref]
177. Mao Guan, Xiao-Yang Liu. 2022. Explainable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Portfolio
Management: An Empirical Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal 18. . [Crossref]
178. Elliot Beck, Gianluca De Nard, Michael Wolf. 2022. Improved Inference in Financial Factor Models.
SSRN Electronic Journal 52. . [Crossref]
179. Tarun K. Mukherjee, Yuxin Huang, Wei Wang. 2022. Labor Protection and Financing Decisions of
Chinese Firms. SSRN Electronic Journal 31. . [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2022.102611
https://doi.org/10.1145/3514262.3514349
https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2020.1821688
https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2020.1848838
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78795-0_10
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81663-6_16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95695-0_2
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04162-4_11
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11612-4_1
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.04.052
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59489-1_2
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59489-1_6
https://doi.org/10.3390/math10010142
https://doi.org/10.5937/intrev2202021K
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1057
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82711-3_9
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82711-3_14
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5191-5_2
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5191-5_3
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4010230
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4061958
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4107472
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4169726
180. Samuel G. B. Johnson, David Tuckett. 2022. Narrative expectations in financial forecasting. Journal
of Behavioral Decision Making 35:1. . [Crossref]
181. Xiang Gao, Kees Koedijk, Maurizio Montone, Zhan Wang. 2022. The Prospect Capital Asset Pricing
Model: Theory and Empirics. SSRN Electronic Journal 74. . [Crossref]
182. Federico Bastianello. 2022. Time-Series and Cross-Section of Risk Premia Expectations: A Bottom-
Up Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal 107. . [Crossref]
183. Abhijeet Ghadge, Sarat Kumar Jena, Sachin Kamble, Dheeraj Misra, Manoj Kumar Tiwari. 2021.
Impact of financial risk on supply chains: a manufacturer-supplier relational perspective. International
Journal of Production Research 59:23, 7090-7105. [Crossref]
184. James Ming Chen. 2021. This Is the Way the World Ends, Not With a Bang but Bonds and Bullets.
Frontiers in Climate 3. . [Crossref]
185. Ali Habibnia, Esfandiar Maasoumi. 2021. Forecasting in Big Data Environments: An Adaptable and
Automated Shrinkage Estimation of Neural Networks (AAShNet). Journal of Quantitative Economics
19:S1, 363-381. [Crossref]
186. Gabriel Augusto de Carvalho, Hudson Fernandes Amaral, Juliano Lima Pinheiro, Laíse Ferraz Correia.
2021. The pricing of anomalies using factor models: a test in Latin American markets. Revista
Contabilidade & Finanças 32:87, 492-509. [Crossref]
187. Mounir Sarraj, Anouar Ben Mabrouk. 2021. The Systematic Risk at the Crisis—A Multifractal Non-
Uniform Wavelet Systematic Risk Estimation. Fractal and Fractional 5:4, 135. [Crossref]
188. Olivier Mesly. 2021. Buy Now and Pay (Dearly) Later: Unraveling Consumer Financial Spinning.
International Journal of Financial Studies 9:4, 55. [Crossref]
189. Xingchen Wan, Jie Yang, Slavi Marinov, Jan-Peter Calliess, Stefan Zohren, Xiaowen Dong. 2021.
Sentiment correlation in financial news networks and associated market movements. Scientific Reports
11:1. . [Crossref]
190. Rim Zouari-Hadiji, Yamina Chouaibi. 2021. Corporate ethical behavior and the cost of equity capital:
evidence from the world’s most ethical companies. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting 19:5,
939-964. [Crossref]
191. Mao Guan, Xiao-Yang Liu. Explainable deep reinforcement learning for portfolio management 1-9.
[Crossref]
192. Qingyuan Han, Steve Keen. 2021. Aggregate excess demand on wall street. Heliyon 7:11, e08355.
[Crossref]
193. Mikuláš Pýcha. 2021. Fair Insurance Cover for Export Credit Under OECD Pricing Framework.
Prague Economic Papers 30:5, 509-528. [Crossref]
194. Robin Maximilian Stetzka, Stefan Winter. 2021. How rational is gambling?. Journal of Economic
,Surveys 1. . [Crossref]
195. Indranil Ghosh, Tamal Datta Chaudhuri, Esteban Alfaro-Cortés, Matías Gámez Martínez, Noelia
García Rubio. 2021. Estimating the relative effects of raw material prices, sectoral outlook and market
sentiment on stock prices. Resources Policy 73, 102158. [Crossref]
196. Nebat Galo Mugenda, Tobias Olweny, Joshua M. Wepukhulu. 2021. Value Risk Premium and Stock
Returns in Kenya: Exploring the Moderating Effect of Investor Sentiment. Journal of Accounting and
Finance in Emerging Economies 7:3, 777-787. [Crossref]
197. Emie Famieza Zainudin, Hafiza Aishah Hashim, Shahnaz Ismail. 2021. The effect of the imposition
of a public reprimand on the stock price of companies in Malaysia. Journal of Financial Crime 28:4,
1232-1243. [Crossref]
198. Daniel O Cajueiro, Saulo B Bastos, Camila C Pereira, Roberto F S Andrade. 2021. A model of indirect
contagion based on a news similarity network. Journal of Complex Networks 9:5. . [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2245
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4301832
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4204968
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1834638
https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.758021
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-021-00275-7
https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x202111640
https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract5040135
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs9040055
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82338-6
https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-08-2020-0223
https://doi.org/10.1145/3490354.3494415
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08355
https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.779
https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12473
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102158
https://doi.org/10.26710/jafee.v7i3.1992
https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2020-0233
https://doi.org/10.1093/comnet/cnab035
199. J E Woods. 2021. The safety of speculation …. Cambridge Journal of Economics 45:5, 1069-1097.
[Crossref]
200. Marcello Basili, Carlo Zappia. 2021. Financial markets and Keynes’s long-term expectations.
Cambridge Journal of Economics 45:5, 1047-1067. [Crossref]
201. Brandon Flores, Blessing Ofori-Atta, Andrey Sarantsev. 2021. A stock market model based on CAPM
and market size. Annals of Finance 17:3, 405-424. [Crossref]
202. Glen Lehman, Chris Mortensen. 2021. Finance, Nature and Ontology. Topoi 40:4, 715-724.
[Crossref]
203. Gregory Price, Warren Whatley. 2021. Did profitable slave trading enable the expansion of empire?:
The Asiento de Negros, the South Sea Company and the financial revolution in Great Britain.
Cliometrica 15:3, 675-718. [Crossref]
204. James Ming Chen. 2021. The Capital Asset Pricing Model. Encyclopedia 1:3, 915-933. [Crossref]
205. Jamshid Karimov, Faruk Balli, Hatice Ozer‐Balli, Anne de Bruin. 2021. Firm‐level political risk and
Shari’ah compliance: equity capital cost and payouts policy. Accounting & Finance 61:3, 4639-4667.
[Crossref]
206. Seong K. Byun, Zhilu Lin, Siqi Wei. 2021. Are U.S. firms using more short-term debt?. Journal of
Corporate Finance 69, 102012. [Crossref]
207. Alibey KUDAR. 2021. OTOREGRESIF ARBİTRAJ FİYATLAMA VE SERMAYE
VARLIKLARINI FİYATLANDIRMA MODELLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI:
TÜRKİYE’DEKİ BANKACILIK SEKTÖRÜ İÇİN BİR UYGULAMA. Finansal Araştırmalar ve
Çalışmalar Dergisi 13:25, 637-648. [Crossref]
208. Suman Saha, Junbin Gao, Richard Gerlach. Stock Movement Prediction on Ex-Dividend Day Using
Event Specific Features and Machine Learning Techniques 1-10. [Crossref]
209. Jordan Bowes, Marcel Ausloos. 2021. Financial Risk and Better Returns through Smart Beta
Exchange-Traded Funds?. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 14:7, 283. [Crossref]
210. Kam Fong Chan, Terry Marsh. 2021. Asset prices, midterm elections, and political uncertainty.
Journal of Financial Economics 141:1, 276-296. [Crossref]
211. Tong Zhao. An Empirical Study of China's Broad ESG Partial Equity Hybrid Fund 51-57. [Crossref]
212. Abdul Qoyum, Rizqi Umar Al Hashfi, Alyta Shabrina Zusryn, Hadri Kusuma, Ibnu Qizam. 2021.
Does an Islamic-SRI portfolio really matter? Empirical application of valuation models in Indonesia.
Borsa Istanbul Review 21:2, 105-124. [Crossref]
213. Christoph Merkle, Christoph J. Sextroh. 2021. Value and momentum from investors’ perspective:
Evidence from professionals’ risk-ratings. Journal of Empirical Finance 62, 159-178. [Crossref]
214. Joel M. Vanden. 2021. Equilibrium asset pricing and the cross section of expected returns. Annals of
Finance 17:2, 153-186. [Crossref]
215. Shaoping Wang, Lu Yu, Qing Zhao. 2021. Do factor models explain stock returns when prices behave
explosively? Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 67, 101535. [Crossref]
216. Xuanwu Yue, Qiao Gu, Deyun Wang, Huamin Qu, Yong Wang. 2021. iQUANT: Interactive
Quantitative Investment Using Sparse Regression Factors. Computer Graphics Forum 40:3, 189-200.
[Crossref]
217. sem*n Yu. BOGATYREV. 2021. Simulation of emotional differences in the structured query language
for databases of financial markets. Financial Analytics: Science and Experience 14:2, 156-173. [Crossref]
218. Yiannis Karavias, Stella Spilioti, Elias Tzavalis. 2021. Investor sentiment effects on share price
deviations from their intrinsic values based on accounting fundamentals. Review of Quantitative Finance
and Accounting 56:4, 1593-1621. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beab012
https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beab013
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10436-021-00390-8
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-019-09654-5
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11698-020-00219-w
https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia1030070
https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12743
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.102012
https://doi.org/10.14784/marufacd.976601
https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN52387.2021.9533799
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14070283
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.03.007
https://doi.org/10.1145/3477282.3477293
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2020.08.002
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2021.03.004
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10436-021-00383-7
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101535
https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14299
https://doi.org/10.24891/fa.14.2.156
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-020-00937-2
219. Emanuel Kohlscheen, Előd Takáts. 2021. What can commercial property performance reveal about
bank valuations?. Journal of International Money and Finance 113, 102350. [Crossref]
220. Catalin Dragomirescu-Gaina, Dionisis Philippas, Mike G. Tsionas. 2021. Trading off accuracy for
speed: Hedge funds' decision-making under uncertainty. International Review of Financial Analysis 75,
101728. [Crossref]
221. Sergei Yu. BOGATYREV. 2021. Looking into bubbles in financial markets and the emotional side
of corporate forecast completion through modeling in the structured query language of financial
databases. Finance and Credit 27:4, 833-850. [Crossref]
222. Muhammad Imran, Mengyun Wu, Linrong Zhang, Yun Zhao, Noor Jehan, Hee Cheol Moon. 2021.
Market Premium and Macroeconomic Factors as Determinants of Industry Premium: Evidence from
Emerging Economies. Complexity 2021, 1-11. [Crossref]
223. Vu Tuan Chu, Trang Hanh Lam Pham. 2021. Zero leverage and product market competition. SN
Business & Economics 1:4. . [Crossref]
224. MICHAEL UNGEHEUER, MARTIN WEBER. 2021. The Perception of Dependence, Investment
Decisions, and Stock Prices. The Journal of Finance 76:2, 797-844. [Crossref]
225. Thorsten Hens, Fatemeh Naebi. 2021. Behavioural heterogeneity in the capital asset pricing model
with an application to the low-beta anomaly. Applied Economics Letters 28:6, 501-507. [Crossref]
226. Sergei Yu. BOGATYREV. 2021. The sentiment analysis method in finance: The psychological-
financial index. Finance and Credit 27:3, 561-584. [Crossref]
227. Ade Imam Muslim, Doddy Setiawan. 2021. Information Asymmetry, Ownership Structure and Cost
of Equity Capital: The Formation for Open Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology,
Market, and Complexity 7:1, 48. [Crossref]
228. . Bibliography 264-272. [Crossref]
229. Karl-Heinz Tödter, Gerhard Ziebarth. 2021. Lifetime Cost of Living and Effective Prices: Theory
and Evidence for Germany. Jahrbücher
,für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 241:1, 29-69. [Crossref]
230. Chaochao Jia, Weimin Pan, Lixian Li. Two Branch Risk Factors Model for Stock Prediction 361-366.
[Crossref]
231. Nadia Anjum, Suresh Kumar Oad Rajput. 2021. Forecasting Islamic equity indices alpha. International
Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management 14:1, 183-203. [Crossref]
232. Brittany Tarufelli, Brian Snyder, David Dismukes. 2021. The Potential Impact of the U.S. Carbon
Capture and Storage Tax Credit Expansion on the Economic Feasibility of Industrial Carbon Capture
and Storage. Energy Policy 149, 112064. [Crossref]
233. Ze Zhang, Zilai Tang. 2021. Examination and Interpretation of the Quantitative Validity in China’s
Corporate-based Urban Network Analysis. Chinese Geographical Science 31:1, 41-53. [Crossref]
234. Alfonso A. Rojo-Ramírez. 2021. Rendimiento mínimo del inversor-propietario. El caso de la empresa
pyme familiar. Small Business International Review 5:1, e287. [Crossref]
235. Volker Ziemann. Portfolio Theory and CAPM 15-28. [Crossref]
236. James W. Kolari, Wei Liu, Jianhua Z. Huang. Cross-Sectional Tests of the ZCAPM 159-195.
[Crossref]
237. Steve Keen. Burying Samuelson’s Multiplier-Accelerator and Resurrecting Goodwin’s Growth Cycle
in Minsky 495-519. [Crossref]
238. Giuseppe Galloppo. Performance 43-150. [Crossref]
239. Harold L. Vogel. Rationality Rules 317-379. [Crossref]
240. Olivier Dessaint, Jacques Olivier, Clemens A Otto, David Thesmar. 2021. CAPM-Based Company
(Mis)valuations. The Review of Financial Studies 34:1, 1-66. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2020.102350
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101728
https://doi.org/10.24891/fc.27.4.833
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5534856
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-021-00062-9
https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12993
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1761529
https://doi.org/10.24891/fc.27.3.561
https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010048
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119381037.biblio
https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2019-0022
https://doi.org/10.1145/3459104.3459163
https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-02-2019-0068
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112064
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-021-1175-y
https://doi.org/10.26784/sbir.v5i1.287
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63643-2_3
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65197-8_7
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67190-7_18
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76128-8_2
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79182-7_7
https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa049
241. Suman Saha, Junbin Gao, Richard Gerlach. 2021. Stock Ranking Prediction Using List-Wise
Approach and Node Embedding Technique. IEEE Access 9, 88981-88996. [Crossref]
242. James Ming Chen. 2021. The Capital Asset Pricing Model. SSRN Electronic Journal 23. . [Crossref]
243. Sergio Copiello. 2021. Economic viability of building energy efficiency measures: a review on the
discount rate. AIMS Energy 9:2, 257-285. [Crossref]
244. Jhumur Sengupta. Application of Econometrics in Business Research 137-159. [Crossref]
245. Konstantin Kostin, Philippe Runge, Ronald Adams. 2021. Investment strategies in pandemic
situations: An analysis and comparison of prospective returns between developed and emerging
markets. Strategic Management 26:1, 34-52. [Crossref]
246. İbrahim Ethem Güney, Abdullah Kazdal, Doruk Küçüksaraç, Muhammed Hasan Yılmaz. Exchange
Rate Sensitivity of Firm Value: Evidence from Nonfinancial Firms Listed on Borsa Istanbul 141-165.
[Crossref]
247. Marcel Aloy, Floris Laly, Sébastien Laurent, Christelle Lecourt. Modeling Time-Varying Conditional
Betas. A Comparison of Methods with Application for REITs 229-264. [Crossref]
248. James W. Kolari, Wei Liu, Jianhua Z. Huang. Capital Asset Pricing Models 25-52. [Crossref]
249. James W. Kolari, Wei Liu, Jianhua Z. Huang. Synopsis of Asset Pricing and the ZCAPM 261-285.
[Crossref]
250. Muhammad Suhail Rizwan, Ghufran Ahmad, Dawood Ashraf. 2021. Systemic Risk in Dual-Banking
Systems during the COVID-19 Pandemic. SSRN Electronic Journal 33. . [Crossref]
251. James Ming Chen. 2021. This Is the Way the World Ends, Not with a Bang but Bonds and Bullets.
SSRN Electronic Journal 54. . [Crossref]
252. Luis R. Gomez-Mejia, Francesco Chirico, Geoffrey Martin, Massimo Baù. 2021. Best Among the
Worst or Worst Among the Best? Socioemotional Wealth and Risk-Performance Returns for Family
and Non-Family Firms Under Financial Distress. SSRN Electronic Journal 18. . [Crossref]
253. Maurizio Montone, Remco C.J. Zwinkels. 2021. Risk, return, and sentiment in a virtual asset market.
SSRN Electronic Journal 129. . [Crossref]
254. Andy Yeh. 2021. Stock Market Alphas Help Predict Macroeconomic Innovations. SSRN Electronic
Journal 19. . [Crossref]
255. Mario Situm. 2021. Determination of expected cost of equity with the CAPM: Theoretical extension
using the law of error propagation. Managerial and Decision Economics 42:1, 77-84. [Crossref]
256. Mingyi Hua. 2021. Decrypting the Digital Economy: The Digital Alpha and Its Origins. SSRN
Electronic Journal 110. . [Crossref]
257. Rai Imtiaz Hussain, Shahid Bashir, Shahbaz Hussain. 2020. Financial Sustainability and Corporate
Social Responsibility Under Mediating Effect of Operational Self-Sustainability. Frontiers in
Psychology 11. . [Crossref]
258. Fabio B. Gaertner, Asad Kausar, Logan B. Steele. 2020. Negative accounting earnings and gross
domestic product. Review of Accounting Studies 25:4, 1382-1409. [Crossref]
259. Terrence Hendershott, Dmitry Livdan, Dominik Rösch. 2020. Asset pricing: A tale of night and day.
Journal of Financial Economics 138:3, 635-662. [Crossref]
260. Augustin Landier, David Thesmar. 2020. Earnings Expectations during the COVID-19 Crisis*. The
Review of Asset Pricing Studies 10:4, 598-617. [Crossref]
261. Matthew Wang, Yi-Hong Lin, Ilya Mikhelson. 2020. Regime-Switching Factor Investing with
Hidden Markov Models. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 13:12, 311. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3090834
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3844183
https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2021014
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6673-2.ch010
https://doi.org/10.5937/StraMan2101034K
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54108-8_6
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54252-8_9
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65197-8_2
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65197-8_10
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3824207
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3904934
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3945256
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3787339
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3938357
https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3214
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3886864
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.550029
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-020-09536-x
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.06.006
https://doi.org/10.1093/rapstu/raaa016
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13120311
262. Yuan Hu, Abootaleb Shirvani, W. Brent Lindquist, Frank J. Fabozzi, Svetlozar T. Rachev. 2020.
Option Pricing Incorporating Factor Dynamics in Complete Markets. Journal of Risk and Financial
Management 13:12, 321. [Crossref]
263. Balázs Csillag, Gábor Neszveda. 2020. A gazdasági várakozások hatása atőzsdei momentumstratégiára.
Közgazdasági Szemle 67:11, 1093-1111. [Crossref]
264. Ganggang Guo, Yulei Rao, Feida Zhu, Fang Xu. 2020. Innovative deep matching algorithm for stock
portfolio selection using deep stock profiles. PLOS ONE 15:11, e0241573. [Crossref]
265. Chariton Chalvatzis, Dimitrios Hristu-Varsakelis. 2020. High-performance stock index trading via
neural networks and trees. Applied Soft Computing 96, 106567. [Crossref]
266. Jonas Puck, Igor Filatotchev. 2020. Finance and the multinational company: Building bridges between
finance and global strategy research. Global Strategy Journal 10:4, 655-675. [Crossref]
267. Chinh Duc Pham, Le Tan Phuoc. 2020. An augmented capital asset pricing model using new
macroeconomic determinants. Heliyon 6:10, e05185. [Crossref]
268. Saad Faysal, Mahdi Salehi, Mahdi Moradi. 2020. The impact of ownership structure on the cost of
equity in emerging markets. Management Research Review
,43:10, 1221-1239. [Crossref]
269. Lin Chen, Junbo Wang, Chunchi Wu, Hongquan Zhu. Divergent Opinion, Trading Information,
and Stock Price Co-movements 1-21. [Crossref]
270. Michael Curran, Adnan Velic. 2020. The CAPM, National Stock Market Betas, and Macroeconomic
Covariates: a Global Analysis. Open Economies Review 31:4, 787-820. [Crossref]
271. Jamshid Karimov, Faruk Balli, Hatice Ozer Balli, Anne de Bruin. 2020. Shari'ah compliance
requirements and the cost of equity capital. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 62, 101349. [Crossref]
272. Ali Boloorforoosh, Peter Christoffersen, Mathieu Fournier, Christian Gouriéroux. 2020. Beta Risk
in the Cross-Section of Equities. The Review of Financial Studies 33:9, 4318-4366. [Crossref]
273. Vanita Tripathi, Priti Aggarwal. 2020. Is value premium sector-specific? Evidence from India.
Managerial Finance 46:12, 1605-1628. [Crossref]
274. Tong Zhang. Stock Picking Strategy Based on Exploration of Chip Distribution Indicators 276-282.
[Crossref]
275. Lerzan Aksoy, Sabine Benoit, Shreekant G. Joag, Jay Kandampully, Timothy Lee Keiningham, An
L. Yan. 2020. Enterprise feedback management (EFM): what lies beyond the hype?. Journal of Service
Management 32:1, 53-69. [Crossref]
276. Patricia Sepúlveda Orejuela, María Dolores Guerrero-Baena, José A. Gómez-Limón. 2020.
Desempeño económico-financiero de los distintos modelos empresariales en el sector del aceite de
oliva en España. Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Segunda Época :1, 227-248. [Crossref]
277. Chinh Duc Pham, Le Tan Phuoc. 2020. Is estimating the Capital Asset Pricing Model using monthly
and short-horizon data a good choice?. Heliyon 6:7, e04339. [Crossref]
278. Myrthe van Dieijen, Abhishek Borah, Gerard J. Tellis, Philip Hans Franses. 2020. Big Data Analysis
of Volatility Spillovers of Brands across Social Media and Stock Markets. Industrial Marketing
Management 88, 465-484. [Crossref]
279. Yingyi Hu, Tiao Zhao, Lin Zhang. 2020. Noise trading, institutional trading, and opinion divergence:
Evidence on intraday data in the Chinese stock market. International Review of Economics & Finance
68, 74-89. [Crossref]
280. Wei Kang Loo. 2020. Predictability of HK-REITs returns using artificial neural network. Journal of
Property Investment & Finance 38:4, 291-307. [Crossref]
281. A. S. Shaghikyan, H. N. Hayrapetyan. 2020. Equity Crowdfunding in the Eurasian Economic Union
(EAEU). Finance: Theory and Practice 24:3, 45-59. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13120321
https://doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2020.11.1093
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241573
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106567
https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1330
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05185
https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-11-2019-0475
https://doi.org/10.1108/S2514-465020200000008001
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-020-09579-2
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101349
https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz139
https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-02-2020-0049
https://doi.org/10.1109/CDS49703.2020.00061
https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-03-2020-0070
https://doi.org/10.17561//ree.v2020n1.13
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04339
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.12.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.03.012
https://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF-07-2019-0090
https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2020-24-3-45-59
282. Philippe Dupuy, Michel Albouy, Christophe Bonnet, Safwan Mchawrab. 2020. Cash Holdings and
the Selection Effect intheEurozone. Finance Vol. 41:2, 53-106. [Crossref]
283. Naji Massad, Jørgen Vitting Andersen. 2020. Defining an intrinsic “stickiness” parameter of stock
price returns. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 547, 124464. [Crossref]
284. Seong Mi Bae, Hyoung‐Tae An, Jong Dae Kim. 2020. Mediators Linking Information Quality and
the Cost of Equity Capital*. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies 49:3, 410-437. [Crossref]
285. Nisa Vinodkumar, Hadeel Khalid AlJasser. 2020. Financial evaluation of Tadawul All Share Index
(TASI) listed stocks using Capital Asset Pricing Model. Investment Management and Financial
Innovations 17:2, 69-75. [Crossref]
286. Jie Qin. 2020. Regret-based capital asset pricing model. Journal of Banking & Finance 114, 105784.
[Crossref]
287. Hoang Thanh Hanh, Le Thi Viet Nga, Dinh Tran Ngoc Huy, Luong Minh Lan, Pham Minh Dat.
2020. The Quantified Analysis of Causes of Market Risk Fluctuations in the Group of Construction,
Real Estate and Construction Material Companies in Vietnam During and After the Global
Crisis 2007-2011. WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT 16,
189-197. [Crossref]
288. Saejoon Kim, Soong Kim. 2020. Index tracking through deep latent representation learning.
Quantitative Finance 20:4, 639-652. [Crossref]
289. Benjamin Pfister, Manfred Schwaiger, Tobias Morath. 2020. Corporate reputation and the future
cost of equity. Business Research 13:1, 343-384. [Crossref]
290. Panagiotis Anastasiadis, Efthimios Katsaros, Anastasios-Taxiarchis Koutsioukis, Athanasios Pandazis.
2020. Performance-Risk Nexus of Global Low-Rated ETFs During the QE-Tapering Period. Studies
in Business and Economics 15:1, 194-211. [Crossref]
291. Yehui Wang, Jianxu Liu, Yuxuan Tang, Songsak Sriboonchitta. 2020. Housing Risk and Its Influence
on House Price: An Expected Utility Approach. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2020, 1-16.
[Crossref]
292. Anastasia Simmet, Winfried Pohlmeier. 2020. The CAPM with Measurement Error: ‘There’s life in
the old dog yet!’. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 240:4, 417-453. [Crossref]
293. O. E. Medvedeva, A. I. Artemenkov. 2020. THEORETICAL BASES OF ECONOMIC
MEASUREMENT OF VALUE IN THE CONDITIONS OF GLOBAL TECHNOLOGICAL
SHIFTS AND CRISES. NEWEST METHODOLOGICAL BASE (PART 2). Vestnik Universiteta
:1, 114-120. [Crossref]
294. Damian Shaw-Williams, Connie Susilawati. 2020. A techno-economic evaluation of Virtual Net
Metering for the Australian community housing sector. Applied Energy 261, 114271. [Crossref]
295. Semra Bank, Evrim Erdogan Yazar, Ugur Sivri. 2020. The portfolios with strong brand value: More
returns? Lower risk?. Borsa Istanbul Review 20:1, 64-79. [Crossref]
296. Prince Worzie. 2020. FACTORS AFFECTING INVESTMENT DECISIONS AMONG LISTED
FIRMS IN THE NAIROBI SECURITIES EXCHANGE. International Journal of Engineering
Technologies and Management Research 7:2, 124-142. [Crossref]
297. Mehmet Levent ERDAŞ. 2020. DEVELOPING A PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION MODEL
BASED ON LINEAR PROGRAMMING UNDER CERTAIN CONSTRAINTS: AN
APPLICATION ON BORSA ISTANBUL 30 INDEX. TESAM Akademi Dergisi 7:1, 115-141.
[Crossref]
298. Fenghua Wen, Nan Wu, Xu Gong. 2020. China's carbon emissions trading and stock returns. Energy
Economics 86, 104627. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.3917/fina.412.0053
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.124464
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12299
https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(2).2020.06
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2020.105784
https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2020.16.19
https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2019.1683599
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0092-8
https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2020-0015
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3943676
https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2018-0089
https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2020-1-114-120
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114271
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2019.09.001
https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v7.i2.2020.533
https://doi.org/10.30626/tesamakademi.696299
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104627
299. Filippo Vitolla, Antonio Salvi, Nicola Raimo, Felice Petruzzella, Michele Rubino. 2020. The impact
on the cost of equity capital in the effects of integrated reporting quality. Business Strategy and the
Environment 29:2, 519-529. [Crossref]
300. Le Tan Phuoc, Chinh Duc Pham. 2020. The systematic risk estimation models: A different
perspective. Heliyon 6:2, e03371. [Crossref]
301. Shea D. Chen, Andrew E. B. Lim. 2020. A Generalized Black–Litterman Model. Operations Research
18. . [Crossref]
302. Andres F. Cantillo. 2020. Production commitments and the financial foundations
,of specialized
economies. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 43:1, 90-111. [Crossref]
303. Oussama Tilfani, Paulo Ferreira, My Youssef El Boukfaoui. 2020. Multiscale optimal portfolios using
CAPM fractal regression: estimation for emerging stock markets. Post-Communist Economies 32:1,
77-112. [Crossref]
304. Duane W Rockerbie, Stephen T. Easton. Contract Options for Buyers and Sellers of Talent 53-67.
[Crossref]
305. Stefan Behringer. Die Entwicklung der angelsächsischen Unternehmensbewertung –
kapitalmarktorientierter Ansatz 79-102. [Crossref]
306. Nguyen Huu Anh, Nguyen La Soa, Ha Hong Hanh. 2020. Environmental accounting practices and
cost of capital of enterprises in Vietnam. Cogent Economics & Finance 8:1, 1790964. [Crossref]
307. Kam Fong Chan, Terry Marsh. 2020. Asset Pricing around Earnings Announcement Days. SSRN
Electronic Journal 62. . [Crossref]
308. Hasan A Fallahgoul, Vincentius Franstianto. 2020. Towards Explaining Deep Learning: Significance
Tests for Multi-Layer Perceptrons. SSRN Electronic Journal 12. . [Crossref]
309. Augustin Landier, David Thesmar. 2020. Earnings Expectations in the COVID Crisis. SSRN
Electronic Journal 24. . [Crossref]
310. Anne M. Tucker, Yusen Xia, Susan Smelcer. 2020. It Ain’t Just What Funds Disclose (It's The Way
That They Do It). SSRN Electronic Journal 35. . [Crossref]
311. Majeed Simaan. 2020. Working with CRSP/COMPUSTAT in R: Reproducible Empirical Asset
Pricing. SSRN Electronic Journal 1. . [Crossref]
312. Emanuel Kohlscheen, Előd Takáts. 2020. What Can Commercial Property Performance Reveal about
Bank Valuations?. SSRN Electronic Journal 32. . [Crossref]
313. Phuong Duong, Jinghui Liu, Ian Eddie. 2020. New financial regulatory philosophy: A paradigm shift
in securities market supervision. Corporate Ownership and Control 17:4, 8-17. [Crossref]
314. Tolulope Latunde, Lukman Shina Akinola, Damilola Deborah Dare. 2020. Analysis of capital asset
pricing model on Deutsche bank energy commodity. Green Finance 2:1, 20-34. [Crossref]
315. Tarana Azimova. Challenges in Estimation of Beta 79-98. [Crossref]
316. Luis Javier Sanchez-Barrios, Benedicto Kulwizira Lukanima, Natalia Hernandez-Vargas, Luis Ricardo
Almanza Herazo. Estimating the CAPM Beta for Public and Private Firms 99-125. [Crossref]
317. Ahmad Aref Almazari. Valuation of Banking Sector 175-200. [Crossref]
318. Sandra Andraszewicz. Stock Markets, Market Crashes, and Market Bubbles 205-231. [Crossref]
319. Ron Alquist, Benjamin Remy Chabot, Ram Yamarthy. 2020. The Price of Property Rights:
Institutions, Finance, and Economic Growth. SSRN Electronic Journal 113. . [Crossref]
320. Anouar Ben Mabrouk. 2020. Wavelet-based systematic risk estimation: application on GCC stock
markets: the Saudi Arabia case. Quantitative Finance and Economics 4:4, 542-595. [Crossref]
321. Stefan Anchev, Nicha Lapanan. 2020. Investor Base Size and Stock Return Anomalies. SSRN
Electronic Journal 73. . [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2384
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03371
https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2019.1893
https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2019.1672561
https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2019.1640983
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49513-8_3
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28703-0_5
https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1790964
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3535598
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3553253
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3587394
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3674572
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3676675
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3740625
https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv17i4art1
https://doi.org/10.3934/GF.2020002
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1086-5.ch005
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1086-5.ch006
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1086-5.ch010
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45500-2_10
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3677287
https://doi.org/10.3934/QFE.2020026
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3743808
322. Hammad Siddiqi. 2020. Resource Allocation in the Brain and the Capital Asset Pricing Model. SSRN
Electronic Journal 81. . [Crossref]
323. Jakob Thomä, Michael Hayne, Nikolaus Hagedorn, Clare Murray, Rebecca Grattage. 2019. The
alignment of global equity and corporate bonds markets with the Paris Agreement. Journal of Applied
Accounting Research 20:4, 439-457. [Crossref]
324. Marc Schaffer. 2019. The role of competition, innovation, and regulation on financial intermediary
risk. Managerial Finance 45:12, 1580-1600. [Crossref]
325. Marília Cordeiro Pinheiro, André Luiz Marques Serrano. 2019. Analysis of the impact of Fies on
the stock returns from the higher education sector. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças 30:81, 368-380.
[Crossref]
326. Tomislav Gelo, Željko Vrban, Dalibor Pudić. 2019. Allowed Revenue of Network System Operators
in the Croatian Energy Sector and Interest Rate Changes on the Croatian Capital Market. Zagreb
International Review of Economics and Business 22:s2, 73-91. [Crossref]
327. Saurabh Gupta, Saumitra N. Bhaduri. 2019. Skin in the game – investor behavior in asset pricing, the
Indian context. Review of Behavioral Finance 11:4, 373-392. [Crossref]
328. Babak Jafarizadeh, Reidar B. Bratvold. 2019. Exploration economics: taking opportunities and the
risk of double-counting risk. Mineral Economics 32:3, 323-335. [Crossref]
329. Liping Liu. 2019. The reducibility of matrix sweeping operations: A computational issue in linear
belief functions. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 114, 226-247. [Crossref]
330. Sabine Elmiger. 2019. CAPM-anomalies: quantitative puzzles. Economic Theory 68:3, 643-667.
[Crossref]
331. Levan Efremidze, Darrol J. Stanley, Abraham Park, Nikolai Wasilewski. 2019. Empirical
implementation of entropy risk factor model: A test on Chilean peso. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics
and its Applications 532, 121836. [Crossref]
332. Joanne Hamet, Frantz Maurer. 2019. Valeur intrinsèque et valeur temps de la recherche en sciences
de gestion. Revue Française de Gestion 45:284, 103-123. [Crossref]
333. Natalia Bailey, George Kapetanios, M. Hashem Pesaran. 2019. Exponent of Cross-sectional
Dependence for Residuals. Sankhya B 81:S1, 46-102. [Crossref]
334. Tzu-Lun Huang. 2019. Is the Fama and French five-factor model robust in the Chinese stock market?.
Asia Pacific Management Review 24:3, 278-289. [Crossref]
335. Yang, Nguyen. 2019. Skewness Preference and Asset Pricing: Evidence from the Japanese Stock
Market. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 12:3, 149. [Crossref]
336. Nesrin ÖZKAN. 2019. q-Faktör Modelinin Borsa İstanbul’da Geçerliliğinin Test Edilmesi. Eskişehir
Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 14:2, 441-456. [Crossref]
337. Anwar Hasan Abdullah Othman, Syed Musa Alhabshi, Razali Haron. 2019. The effect of symmetric
and asymmetric information on volatility structure of crypto-currency markets. Journal of Financial
Economic Policy 11:3, 432-450. [Crossref]
338. Shaun Cox, James Britten. 2019. The Fama-French five-factor model: Evidence from the
Johannesburg Stock Exchange. Investment Analysts Journal 48:3, 240-261. [Crossref]
339. Richard A. Michelfelder, Pauline Ahern, Dylan D'Ascendis. 2019. Decoupling impact and public
utility conservation investment. Energy Policy 130, 311-319. [Crossref]
340. Johan Knif, James W. Kolari, Gregory Koutmos, Seppo Pynnönen. 2019. Measuring the relative return
contribution of risk factors. Journal of Asset Management 20:4, 263-272. [Crossref]
341. Jana Šimáková, Daniel Stavárek, Tomáš Pražák, Marie Ligocká. 2019. Macroeconomic factors and
stock prices in the food and drink industry. British Food Journal 121:7, 1627-1641. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3591086
https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-03-2018-0034
https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-05-2019-0208
https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201808070
https://doi.org/10.2478/zireb-2019-0028
https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-10-2019-0138
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-019-00188-1
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2019.08.014
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-018-1137-5
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.121836
https://doi.org/10.3166/rfg.2019.00366
,https://doi.org/10.1007/s13571-019-00196-9
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2018.10.002
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12030149
https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.489738
https://doi.org/10.1108/JFEP-10-2018-0147
https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.2019.1647982
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.006
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-019-00121-9
https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-12-2018-0839
342. Shijun Wang, Baocheng Zhu, Lintao Ma, Yuan Qi. A Riemannian Primal-dual Algorithm Based on
Proximal Operator and its Application in Metric Learning 1-8. [Crossref]
343. Ricardo Méndez Romero, Hernán Rocha Pavés. 2019. ANÁLISIS DE LOS FONDOS DE
PENSIONES EN CHILE: PERIODO 2011-2018. Multidisciplinary Business Review 12:1, 1-9.
[Crossref]
344. Thomas Gramespacher, Armin Bänziger. 2019. The Bias in Two-Pass Regression Tests of Asset-
Pricing Models in Presence of Idiosyncratic Errors with Cross-Sectional Dependence. Review of Pacific
Basin Financial Markets and Policies 22:02, 1950012. [Crossref]
345. Muhammad Adnan Arshad, Saira Munir, Bashir Ahmad, Muhammad Waseem. 2019. Do factors
matter for predicting high-risk stock returns? Comparison of single-, three- and five-factor CAPM.
International Journal of Financial Engineering 06:02, 1950015. [Crossref]
346. Qianwei Ying, Tahir Yousaf, Qurat ul Ain, Yasmeen Akhtar, Muhammad Shahid Rasheed. 2019. Stock
Investment and Excess Returns: A Critical Review in the Light of the Efficient Market Hypothesis.
Journal of Risk and Financial Management 12:2, 97. [Crossref]
347. Semra Bank, Evrim Erdogan Yazar, Ugur Sivri. 2019. Can social media marketing lead to abnormal
portfolio returns?. European Research on Management and Business Economics 25:2, 54-62. [Crossref]
348. Roberto Savona, Cesare Orsini. 2019. Taking the right course navigating the ERC universe. Journal
of Asset Management 20:3, 157-174. [Crossref]
349. Defeng Yang, Zhanqing Wang, Fangmin Lu. 2019. The Influence of Corporate Governance
and Operating Characteristics on Corporate Environmental Investment: Evidence from China.
Sustainability 11:10, 2737. [Crossref]
350. Salman Ahmed Shaikh, Mohd Adib Ismail, Abdul Ghafar Ismail, Shahida Shahimi, Muhammad
Hakimi Mohd. Shafiai. 2019. Cross section of stock returns on Shari’ah -compliant stocks: evidence
from Pakistan. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management 12:2,
282-302. [Crossref]
351. Nilanjana Chakraborty, Mohammed M Elgammal, David McMillan. 2019. Rational functions: an
alternative approach to asset pricing. Applied Economics 51:20, 2091-2119. [Crossref]
352. Khaled Elkhal. 2019. Business uncertainty and financial leverage: should the firm double up on risk?.
Managerial Finance 45:4, 536-544. [Crossref]
353. Malik Shahzad Shabbir, Iftikhar Muhammad. 2019. The dynamic impact of foreign portfolio
investment on stock prices in Pakistan. Transnational Corporations Review 11:2, 166-178. [Crossref]
354. Nordine Abidi, Burcu Hacibedel, Mwanza Nkusu. 2019. Frontier and Emerging Markets: A
Perspective from Portfolio Flows and Financial Integration. Journal of Banking and Financial Economics
1/2019:11, 19-45. [Crossref]
355. Benjamin R. Auer, Tobias Hiller. 2019. Can cooperative game theory solve the low‐risk puzzle?.
International Journal of Finance & Economics 24:2, 884-889. [Crossref]
356. Sergio Bravo. 2019. The Corporate Life Cycle and the Cost of Equity. Journal of Business Valuation
and Economic Loss Analysis 14:1. . [Crossref]
357. Yang Ning, Liu Chun Wah, Luo Erdan. 2019. Stock price prediction based on error correction model
and Granger causality test. Cluster Computing 22:S2, 4849-4858. [Crossref]
358. Marisa Basten, Antonio Sánchez Serrano. 2019. European banks after the global financial crisis: a new
landscape. Journal of Banking Regulation 20:1, 51-73. [Crossref]
359. Moting Su, Zongyi Zhang, Ye Zhu, Donglan Zha. 2019. Data-Driven Natural Gas Spot Price
Forecasting with Least Squares Regression Boosting Algorithm. Energies 12:6, 1094. [Crossref]
360. Henry Leung, Jeffrey Tse, P. Joakim Westerholm. 2019. CEO traders and corporate acquisitions.
Journal of Corporate Finance 54, 107-127. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2019.8852367
https://doi.org/10.35692/07183992.12.1.4
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219091519500127
https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424786319500154
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12020097
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2019.04.006
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-019-00117-5
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102737
https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-04-2017-0100
https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1540848
https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-10-2018-0491
https://doi.org/10.1080/19186444.2019.1616508
https://doi.org/10.7172/2353-6845.jbfe.2019.1.2
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1696
https://doi.org/10.1515/jbvela-2018-0009
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-2406-6
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-018-0066-3
https://doi.org/10.3390/en12061094
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.09.013
361. José Roberto Ferreira Savoia, José Roberto Securato, Daniel Reed Bergmann, Fabiana Lopes da
Silva. 2019. Comparing results of the implied cost of capital and capital asset pricing models for
infrastructure firms in Brazil. Utilities Policy 56, 149-158. [Crossref]
362. Jaromír Antoch, Jan Hanousek, Marie Hušková, Jiří Trešl. 2019. Detection of Changes in Panel Data:
Change in Fama-French Model Parameters for Selected European Stocks During the Financial Crisis.
Politická ekonomie 67:1, 3-19. [Crossref]
363. Octávio Valente Campos, Ana Carolina Vasconcelos Colares, Renata Turola Takamatsu, José Roberto
de Souza Francisco. 2019. Precificação de ativos: análise do fator book-to-market após o deemed cost.
Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil 18, 1-16. [Crossref]
364. Mukail Aremu Akinde, Eriki Peter, Ochei Ailemen Ikpefan. 2019. Growth versus value investing:
a case of Nigerian Stock Market. Investment Management and Financial Innovations 16:1, 30-45.
[Crossref]
365. Lanh Tran. How Annualized Wavelet Trading “Beats” the Market 124-137. [Crossref]
366. Dorota Witkowska. Is the Three-Factor Better Than Single-Factor Capital Asset Pricing Model?
Case of Polish Capital Market 225-238. [Crossref]
367. Alessandro Vercelli. The Emergence of Modern Financial Economics 61-91. [Crossref]
368. Susann Ihlau, Hendrik Duscha. Grundlagen der Unternehmensbewertung 17-115. [Crossref]
369. Manfred Gilli, Dietmar Maringer, Enrico Schumann. Optimization problems in finance 219-228.
[Crossref]
370. . Bibliography 599-608. [Crossref]
371. Anh Phong Nguyen, Hoang Anh Nguyen, Thi Hong Minh Ho, Phu Thanh Ngo. 2019. Risk
and returns of different foreign ownership portfolios: Evidence from Vietnam stock market. Cogent
Economics & Finance 7:1, 1589412. [Crossref]
372. Babak Mahdavi-Damghani. 2019. Data-Driven Models & Mathematical Finance: Opposition or
Apposition?. SSRN Electronic Journal 89. . [Crossref]
373. Sassan Zaker. 2019. How Wealth Management Lost Clients in Translation. SSRN Electronic Journal
65. . [Crossref]
374. Anne M. Tucker, Yusen Xia. 2019. Investing in the Dark: Investment Company Disclosure Qualities,
Content & Compliance. SSRN Electronic Journal 70. . [Crossref]
375. Michael Hasler, Charles Martineau. 2019. The CAPM Holds. SSRN Electronic Journal 19. .
[Crossref]
376. Michael Thicke. 2018. Market epistemology. Synthese 195:12, 5571-5594. [Crossref]
377. Sabri Boubaker, Taher Hamza, Javier Vidal-García. 2018. Financial distress and equity returns: A
leverage-augmented three-factor model. Research in International Business and Finance 46, 1-15.
[Crossref]
378. Madhavi Latha Challa, Venkataramanaiah Malepati, Siva Nageswara Rao Kolusu. 2018. Forecasting
risk using auto regressive integrated moving average approach: an evidence from S&P BSE Sensex.
Financial Innovation 4:1. . [Crossref]
379. Patrick O’Sullivan. 2018. The Capital Asset Pricing Model and the Efficient Markets Hypothesis:
The Compelling Fairy Tale of Contemporary Financial Economics. International Journal of Political
Economy 47:3-4, 225-252. [Crossref]
380. Keshav Sahadev,
,of risky assets) to clear the market for risk-free borrowing and lending.
In short, the CAPM assumptions imply that the market portfolio M must be on
the minimum variance frontier if the asset market is to clear. This means that the
algebraic relation that holds for any minimum variance portfolio must hold for the
market portfolio. Specifically, if there are N risky assets,
�Minimum Variance Condition for M� E�Ri � � E�RZM �
� �E�RM� � E�RZM���iM , i � 1, . . . , N.
In this equation, E(Ri) is the expected return on asset i, and �iM, the market beta
of asset i, is the covariance of its return with the market return divided by the
variance of the market return,
�Market Beta� �iM �
cov�Ri , RM �
�2�RM �
.
The first term on the right-hand side of the minimum variance condition,
E(RZM), is the expected return on assets that have market betas equal to zero,
which means their returns are uncorrelated with the market return. The second
term is a risk premium—the market beta of asset i, �iM, times the premium per
unit of beta, which is the expected market return, E(RM), minus E(RZM).
Since the market beta of asset i is also the slope in the regression of its return
on the market return, a common (and correct) interpretation of beta is that it
measures the sensitivity of the asset’s return to variation in the market return. But
there is another interpretation of beta more in line with the spirit of the portfolio
model that underlies the CAPM. The risk of the market portfolio, as measured by
the variance of its return (the denominator of �iM), is a weighted average of the
covariance risks of the assets in M (the numerators of �iM for different assets).
The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence 29
Thus, �iM is the covariance risk of asset i in M measured relative to the average
covariance risk of assets, which is just the variance of the market return.3 In
economic terms, �iM is proportional to the risk each dollar invested in asset i
contributes to the market portfolio.
The last step in the development of the Sharpe-Lintner model is to use the
assumption of risk-free borrowing and lending to nail down E(RZM), the expected
return on zero-beta assets. A risky asset’s return is uncorrelated with the market
return—its beta is zero—when the average of the asset’s covariances with the
returns on other assets just offsets the variance of the asset’s return. Such a risky
asset is riskless in the market portfolio in the sense that it contributes nothing to the
variance of the market return.
When there is risk-free borrowing and lending, the expected return on assets
that are uncorrelated with the market return, E(RZM), must equal the risk-free rate,
Rf. The relation between expected return and beta then becomes the familiar
Sharpe-Lintner CAPM equation,
�Sharpe-Lintner CAPM� E�Ri � � Rf � �E�RM � � Rf �]�iM , i � 1, . . . , N.
In words, the expected return on any asset i is the risk-free interest rate, Rf , plus a
risk premium, which is the asset’s market beta, �iM, times the premium per unit of
beta risk, E(RM) � Rf.
Unrestricted risk-free borrowing and lending is an unrealistic assumption.
Fischer Black (1972) develops a version of the CAPM without risk-free borrowing or
lending. He shows that the CAPM’s key result—that the market portfolio is mean-
variance-efficient—can be obtained by instead allowing unrestricted short sales of
risky assets. In brief, back in Figure 1, if there is no risk-free asset, investors select
portfolios from along the mean-variance-efficient frontier from a to b. Market
clearing prices imply that when one weights the efficient portfolios chosen by
investors by their (positive) shares of aggregate invested wealth, the resulting
portfolio is the market portfolio. The market portfolio is thus a portfolio of the
efficient portfolios chosen by investors. With unrestricted short selling of risky
assets, portfolios made up of efficient portfolios are themselves efficient. Thus, the
market portfolio is efficient, which means that the minimum variance condition for
M given above holds, and it is the expected return-risk relation of the Black CAPM.
The relations between expected return and market beta of the Black and
Sharpe-Lintner versions of the CAPM differ only in terms of what each says about
E(RZM), the expected return on assets uncorrelated with the market. The Black
version says only that E(RZM) must be less than the expected market return, so the
3 Formally, if xiM is the weight of asset i in the market portfolio, then the variance of the portfolio’s
return is
�2�RM� � Cov�RM , RM� � Cov� �
i�1
N
xiMRi , RM� � �
i�1
N
xiMCov�Ri , RM�.
30 Journal of Economic Perspectives
premium for beta is positive. In contrast, in the Sharpe-Lintner version of the
model, E(RZM) must be the risk-free interest rate, Rf , and the premium per unit of
beta risk is E(RM) � Rf.
The assumption that short selling is unrestricted is as unrealistic as unre-
stricted risk-free borrowing and lending. If there is no risk-free asset and short sales
of risky assets are not allowed, mean-variance investors still choose efficient
portfolios—points above b on the abc curve in Figure 1. But when there is no short
selling of risky assets and no risk-free asset, the algebra of portfolio efficiency says
that portfolios made up of efficient portfolios are not typically efficient. This means
that the market portfolio, which is a portfolio of the efficient portfolios chosen by
investors, is not typically efficient. And the CAPM relation between expected return
and market beta is lost. This does not rule out predictions about expected return
and betas with respect to other efficient portfolios—if theory can specify portfolios
that must be efficient if the market is to clear. But so far this has proven impossible.
In short, the familiar CAPM equation relating expected asset returns to their
market betas is just an application to the market portfolio of the relation between
expected return and portfolio beta that holds in any mean-variance-efficient port-
folio. The efficiency of the market portfolio is based on many unrealistic assump-
tions, including complete agreement and either unrestricted risk-free borrowing
and lending or unrestricted short selling of risky assets. But all interesting models
involve unrealistic simplifications, which is why they must be tested against data.
Early Empirical Tests
Tests of the CAPM are based on three implications of the relation between
expected return and market beta implied by the model. First, expected returns on
all assets are linearly related to their betas, and no other variable has marginal
explanatory power. Second, the beta premium is positive, meaning that the ex-
pected return on the market portfolio exceeds the expected return on assets whose
returns are uncorrelated with the market return. Third, in the Sharpe-Lintner
version of the model, assets uncorrelated with the market have expected returns
equal to the risk-free interest rate, and the beta premium is the expected market
return minus the risk-free rate. Most tests of these predictions use either cross-
section or time-series regressions. Both approaches date to early tests of the model.
Tests on Risk Premiums
The early cross-section regression tests focus on the Sharpe-Lintner model’s
predictions about the intercept and slope in the relation between expected return
and market beta. The approach is to regress a cross-section of average asset returns
on estimates of asset betas. The model predicts that the intercept in these regres-
sions is the risk-free interest rate, Rf , and the coefficient on beta is the expected
return on the market in excess of the risk-free rate, E(RM) � Rf.
Two problems in these tests quickly became apparent. First, estimates of beta
Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French 31
for individual assets are imprecise, creating a measurement error problem when
they are used to explain average returns. Second, the regression residuals have
common sources of variation,
,Michael Ward, Chris Muller. 2018. The impact of reference-day risk on beta
estimation and a proposed solution. Investment Analysts Journal 47:4, 327-342. [Crossref]
381. JONGSEOK LIM. 2018. A Study on the Estimation of the Cost of Equity Capital and Performance for
Listed Logistics Service Providers based on CAPM. Korean Journal of Logistics 26:3, 17-32. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2018.12.004
https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.1233
https://doi.org/10.16930/2237-766220192781
https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(1).2019.03
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04263-9_9
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21274-2_16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27912-7_3
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18675-3_3
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815065-8.00022-4
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815065-8.00031-5
https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2019.1589412
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3347739
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3384515
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3436952
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3353903
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1464-2
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.09.003
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-018-0107-z
https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2018.1517462
https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.2018.1497126
https://doi.org/10.15735/kls.2018.26.3.002
382. Fang Zhang, Hong Fang, Xu Wang. 2018. Impact of Carbon Prices on Corporate Value: The Case
of China’s Thermal Listed Enterprises. Sustainability 10:9, 3328. [Crossref]
383. Marta Olivia Rovedder de Oliveira, Aline Armanini Stefanan, Mauri Leodir Lobler. 2018. Brand
equity, risk and return in Latin America. Journal of Product & Brand Management 27:5, 557-572.
[Crossref]
384. John L. Glasco*ck, Ran Lu-Andrews. 2018. The Asymmetric Conditional Beta-Return Relations of
REITs. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 57:2, 231-245. [Crossref]
385. I. Ferguson. 2018. Discount rates for corporate forest valuations. Australian Forestry 81:3, 142-147.
[Crossref]
386. Alfonso A. Rojo Ramírez, Maria J. Martínez Romero. 2018. Required and obtained equity returns in
privately held businesses: the impact of family nature—evidence before and after the global economic
crisis. Review of Managerial Science 12:3, 771-801. [Crossref]
387. Matevž Skočir, Igor Lončarski. 2018. Multi-factor asset pricing models: Factor construction choices
and the revisit of pricing factors. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money
55, 65-80. [Crossref]
388. Serge Darolles, Christian Francq, Sébastien Laurent. 2018. Asymptotics of Cholesky GARCH models
and time-varying conditional betas. Journal of Econometrics 204:2, 223-247. [Crossref]
389. Tomer Shushi. 2018. Stein’s lemma for truncated elliptical random vectors. Statistics & Probability
Letters 137, 297-303. [Crossref]
390. Masato Sasaki, Anas Laamrani, Mitsuo Yamashiro. 2018. An interactive genetic algorithm for
portfolio optimization considering the decision maker’s preference. Journal of Information and
Optimization Sciences 39:4, 989-1008. [Crossref]
391. Lucas Bretschger, Filippo Lechthaler. 2018. Stock performance and economic growth: lessons
from the Japanese case. Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies 11:2, 195-217.
[Crossref]
392. Geeta Lakshmi. 2018. Gekko and black swans: Finance theory in UK undergraduate curricula. Critical
Perspectives on Accounting 52, 35-47. [Crossref]
393. Christophe Schinckus. 2018. Pataphysics of finance: An essay of visual epistemology. Critical
Perspectives on Accounting 52, 57-68. [Crossref]
394. C. Janse van Rensburg, J.D. Krige. 2018. Paying the High Price of Active Management: A New Look
at Unit Trust Fees. Studies in Economics and Econometrics 42:1, 23-40. [Crossref]
395. Milica Radović, Snežana Radukić, Vladimir Njegomir. 2018. The Application of the Markowitz’s
Model in Efficient Portfolio Forming on the Capital Market in the Republic of Serbia. Economic
Themes 56:1, 17-34. [Crossref]
396. Huu T. Huynh, Yi Su, Gunnar Lucko, Richard C. Thompson. Beta Index and Complexity in
Schedule Performance Measurement 471-480. [Crossref]
397. Pablo Koch-Medina, Jan Wenzelburger. 2018. Equilibria in the CAPM with non-tradeable
endowments. Journal of Mathematical Economics 75, 93-107. [Crossref]
398. Jae Wook Song, Bonggyun Ko, Woojin Chang. 2018. Analyzing systemic risk using non-linear
marginal expected shortfall and its minimum spanning tree. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its
Applications 491, 289-304. [Crossref]
399. Harold L. Vogel. Rationality Rules 219-269. [Crossref]
400. Toan Luu Duc Huynh, Sang Phu Nguyen, Duy Duong. Pricing Assets with Higher Co-moments
and Value-at-Risk by Quantile Regression Approach: Evidence from Vietnam Stock Market 953-986.
[Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093328
https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-02-2017-1418
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-017-9614-3
https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2018.1471788
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0230-7
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2018.02.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.02.003
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2018.02.008
https://doi.org/10.1080/02522667.2018.1479208
https://doi.org/10.1080/17520843.2017.1356343
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.01.004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.08.003
https://doi.org/10.1080/10800379.2018.12097325
https://doi.org/10.2478/ethemes-2018-0002
https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481271.046
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2017.12.004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.08.076
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71528-5_6
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73150-6_70
401. Stefan Behringer. Kennzahlen im Konzerncontrolling 89-133. [Crossref]
402. Fengmin Xu, Meihua Wang, Yu-Hong Dai, Dachuan Xu. 2018. A sparse enhanced indexation model
with chance and cardinality constraints. Journal of Global Optimization 70:1, 5-25. [Crossref]
403. Massimo Guidolin, Manuela Pedio. Multivariate GARCH and Conditional Correlation Models
229-266. [Crossref]
404. Bruce D. McNevin, Joan Nix. 2018. The beta heuristic from a time/frequency perspective: A wavelet
analysis of the market risk of sectors. Economic Modelling 68, 570-585. [Crossref]
405. Muhammad Hafidz Anuwar, Maheran Mohd Jaffar. The standardized credit rating grade for
Malaysian listed companies in Bursa Malaysia 020060. [Crossref]
406. Fred Sporta. 2018. The Distressing Effect of Non-Performing Assets to Asset Quality for Commercial
Banks in Kenya. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT 3:6, 71-83. [Crossref]
407. Wei Liu, James W. Kolari, Seppo Pynnonen. 2018. CAPM Beta Lives for Expected Returns. SSRN
Electronic Journal 14. . [Crossref]
408. Deng-Ta Chen. 2018. : CAPM (Security Prices in Mean-Variance Equilibrium: A Further Study on
CAPM). SSRN Electronic Journal 447. . [Crossref]
409. Jessie Y. Zhu, Wally Smieliauskas. 2018. Evidence on the Economic Consequences of Marriage
Equality and LGBT Human Rights. SSRN Electronic Journal 5. . [Crossref]
410. Alex R. Horenstein. 2018. Leverage and Performance Metrics in Asset Pricing. SSRN Electronic
Journal 53. . [Crossref]
411. Kesh Sahadev, Mike Ward, Chris Muller. 2018. A Volume-Weighted-Average-Price (VWAP) Method
for Estimating Beta in the Context of Reference-Day Risk. SSRN Electronic Journal 22. . [Crossref]
412. Malcolm McLelland. 2018. CAPM Failure in Private Equity Valuation and the Alternative APT
Method. SSRN Electronic Journal 73. . [Crossref]
413. Malcolm McLelland. 2018. International Cost of Capital Estimation: The No-Arbitrage Method.
SSRN Electronic Journal 73. . [Crossref]
414. Keshav Sahadev, Mike Ward, Chris Muller. 2018. A Volume-Weighted-Average-Price (VWAP)
Method for Estimating Beta in the Context of Reference-Day Risk. SSRN Electronic Journal 22. .
[Crossref]
415. Zhichuan Frank Li, Dylan Minor, Jun Wang, Chong Yu. 2018. A Learning Curve of the Market:
Chasing Alpha of Socially Responsible Firms. SSRN Electronic Journal 134. . [Crossref]
416. Natalia Bailey, George Kapetanios, M. Hashem Pesaran. 2018. Exponent of Cross-Sectional
Dependence for Residuals. SSRN
,Electronic Journal 31. . [Crossref]
417. Gonul Colak, Dimitrios Gounopoulos, Panagiotis Loukopoulos, Georgios Loukopoulos. 2018. Local
Policy Risk and IPO Performance. SSRN Electronic Journal 51. . [Crossref]
418. Lisa R. Goldberg, Alex Papanicolaou, Alexander Shkolnik. 2018. Better Betas. SSRN Electronic
Journal 9. . [Crossref]
419. Weihao Han. 2018. Persistence and Performance of Chinese Mutual Funds. SSRN Electronic Journal
8. . [Crossref]
420. Daniel Andrei, Henry L. Friedman, N. Bugra Ozel. 2018. The Impact of Business and Economics
News on Investor Attention. SSRN Electronic Journal 28. . [Crossref]
421. Ross Kingwell, Quenten Thomas, David Feldman, Imma Farré, Brad Plunkett. 2018. Traditional farm
expansion versus joint venture remote partnerships. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource
Economics 62:1, 21-44. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55778-5_3
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-017-0513-1
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813409-2.00006-6
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.03.024
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5041591
https://doi.org/10.18775/ijied.1849-7551-7020.2015.36.2006
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2826683
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3103035
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3104061
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3107809
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3123725
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3136537
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3175095
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3210561
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3224796
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3256904
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3275789
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3282465
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3339127
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3128673
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12229
422. Todd D. Gerarden, Richard G. Newell, Robert N. Stavins. 2017. Assessing the Energy-Efficiency
Gap. Journal of Economic Literature 55:4, 1486-1525. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
423. Bogdan Negrea, Mihai Toma. 2017. Dynamic CAPM under ambiguity—An experimental approach.
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 16, 22-32. [Crossref]
424. José María Díez-Esteban, Conrado Diego García-Gómez, Félix Javier López-Iturriaga, Marcos
Santamaría-Mariscal. 2017. Corporate risk-taking, returns and the nature of major shareholders:
Evidence from prospect theory. Research in International Business and Finance 42, 900-911. [Crossref]
425. Yinqiao Li, Renée Spigt, Laurens Swinkels. 2017. The impact of FinTech start-ups on incumbent
retail banks’ share prices. Financial Innovation 3:1. . [Crossref]
426. Diego Broz, Gastón Milanesi, Daniel Alejandro Rossit, Diego Gabriel Rossit, Fernando Tohmé. 2017.
Forest management decision making based on a real options approach: An application to a case in
northeastern Argentina. Forestry Studies 67:1, 97-108. [Crossref]
427. Serdar Neslihanoglu, Vasilios Sogiakas, John H. McColl, Duncan Lee. 2017. Nonlinearities in the
CAPM: Evidence from Developed and Emerging Markets. Journal of Forecasting 36:8, 867-897.
[Crossref]
428. Hung-Chi Li, Syouching Lai, James A. Conover, Frederick Wu, Bin Li. Stock Returns and Financial
Distress Risk: Evidence from the Asian-Pacific Markets 123-158. [Crossref]
429. Marc K. Chan, Simon Kwok. 2017. Risk-sharing, market imperfections, asset prices: Evidence from
China’s stock market liberalization. Journal of Banking & Finance 84, 166-187. [Crossref]
430. Márcio André Veras Machado, Robert Faff, Suelle Cariele de Souza e Silva. 2017. Applicability of
Investment and Profitability Effects in Asset Pricing Models. Revista de Administração Contemporânea
21:6, 851-874. [Crossref]
431. Turan G. Bali, Robert F. Engle, Yi Tang. 2017. Dynamic Conditional Beta Is Alive and Well in the
Cross Section of Daily Stock Returns. Management Science 63:11, 3760-3779. [Crossref]
432. David G. Carmichael. 2017. Adjustments within discount rates to cater for uncertainty—Guidelines.
The Engineering Economist 62:4, 322-335. [Crossref]
433. Gastón Silverio Milanesi. 2017. Valuación de empresas: enfoque integral para mercados emergentes e
inflacionarios. Estudios Gerenciales 33:145, 377-390. [Crossref]
434. Júlio Lobão, Cristiano Pereira. 2017. Psychological barriers in stock market indices: Evidence from
four southern European countries. Cuadernos de Economía 40:114, 268-278. [Crossref]
435. Matheus Duarte Valente Vieira, Vinicius Mothé Maia, Marcelo Cabús Klotzle, Antonio Carlos
Figueiredo. 2017. Modelo de Cinco Fatores de Risco: precificando carteiras setoriais no mercado
acionário brasileiro. Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil 16:48. . [Crossref]
436. Ikrame Ben Slimane, Makram Bellalah, Hatem Rjiba. 2017. Time-varying beta during the 2008
financial crisis – evidence from North America and Western Europe. The Journal of Risk Finance 18:4,
398-431. [Crossref]
437. Karen Paul. 2017. The effect of business cycle, market return and momentum on financial performance
of socially responsible investing mutual funds. Social Responsibility Journal 13:3, 513-528. [Crossref]
438. Sara Aghakhani, Reda Alhajj, Jon Rokne, Philip Chang. An Effective LmRMR for Financial Variable
Selection and its Applications 535-543. [Crossref]
439. Diana Milena Carmona Muñoz, Marcos Vera Leyton. 2017. Evaluación de los factores de riesgo en
los activos de renta variable que conforman el índice S&P MILA 40 : aplicación del modelo de tres
factores de Fama y French en el periodo 2009-2013. Revista Finanzas y Política Económica 9:2, 301-317.
[Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20161360
http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdf/10.1257/jel.20161360
http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jel.20161360
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.09.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.025
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-017-0076-7
https://doi.org/10.1515/fsmu-2017-0015
https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2389
https://doi.org/10.1108/S0196-382120170000033007
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.06.003
https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2017170027
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2536
https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2016.1245376
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2017.10.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesjef.2016.10.005
https://doi.org/10.16930/2237-7662/rccc.v16n48.2376
https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-02-2017-0020
https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2016-0154
https://doi.org/10.1109/IRI.2017.35
https://doi.org/10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v9.n2.2017.1830
440. Daniel Botero Guzman, Jhon Alexis Díaz Contreras. 2017. Análisis de la relación rentabilidad-riesgo
en el mercado accionario internacional para un mundo parcialmente integrado. Ensayos de Economía
27:51, 109-124. [Crossref]
441. Christoph Kaserer, Matthias X. Hanauer. 2017. 25 Jahre Fama-French-Modell: Erklärungsgehalt,
Anomalien und praktische Implikationen. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 18:2, 98-116. [Crossref]
442. Abel Rodríguez, Ziwei Wang, Athanasios Kottas. 2017. Assessing systematic risk in the S&P500 index
between 2000 and 2011: A Bayesian nonparametric approach. The Annals of Applied Statistics 11:2. .
[Crossref]
443. Jill A. Brown, Anne Anderson, Jesus M. Salas, Andrew J. Ward. 2017. Do Investors Care About
Director Tenure? Insights from Executive Cognition and Social Capital Theories. Organization Science
28:3, 471-494. [Crossref]
444. Chandana Shahi, Sherrill Shaffer. 2017. CAPM and the changing distribution of historical returns.
Applied Economics Letters 24:9, 639-642. [Crossref]
445. Kwanglim Seo, Ellen Eun Kyoo Kim, Amit Sharma. 2017. Examining the determinants of long-term
debt in the US restaurant industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
29:5, 1501-1520. [Crossref]
446. Kevin E. Dow, Marcia Weidenmier Watson, Vincent J. Shea. 2017. Riding the waves of technology
through the decades: The relation between industry-level information technology intensity and the
cost of equity capital. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 25, 18-28. [Crossref]
447. Xiao-Ping Steven Zhang, Fang Wang. 2017. Signal Processing for Finance, Economics, and
Marketing: Concepts, framework, and big data applications.
,IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 34:3,
14-35. [Crossref]
448. Joseph Nyangon, John Byrne, Job Taminiau. 2017. An assessment of price convergence between
natural gas and solar photovoltaic in the U.S. electricity market. WIREs Energy and Environment
6:3. . [Crossref]
449. Federico Etro, Elena Stepanova. 2017. Art Auctions and Art Investment in the Golden Age of British
Painting. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 64:2, 191-225. [Crossref]
450. Gaëlle Lenormand, Lionel Touchais. 2017. L’impact de l’IFRS 8 sur le coût des capitaux propres.
Management & Avenir N° 92:2, 133-152. [Crossref]
451. Devi Lusyana, Mohamed Sherif. 2017. Shariah -compliant investments and stock returns: evidence
from the Indonesian stock market. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research 8:2, 143-160.
[Crossref]
452. Vance Lesseig, Janet D. Payne. 2017. The precision of asset beta estimates. International Journal of
Managerial Finance 13:2, 213-224. [Crossref]
453. Guillaume Coqueret. 2017. Empirical properties of a heterogeneous agent model in large dimensions.
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 77, 180-201. [Crossref]
454. Zarah Puspitaningtyas. 2017. Estimating systematic risk for the best investment decisions on
manufacturing company in Indonesia. Investment Management and Financial Innovations 14:1, 46-54.
[Crossref]
455. Vijay Gondhalekar, Kevin Lehnert. Financial Performance and the Competitive Effects of Corporate
Social Responsibility 1-21. [Crossref]
456. Danielle Claire Sanderson, Steven Devaney. 2017. Occupier satisfaction and its impact on investment
returns from UK commercial real estate. Journal of Property Investment & Finance 35:2, 135-159.
[Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.15446/ede.v27n51.69070
https://doi.org/10.1515/pwp-2017-0011
https://doi.org/10.1214/16-AOAS987
https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1123
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2016.1217304
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-06-2015-0274
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2017.03.001
https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2017.2663138
https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.238
https://doi.org/10.1111/sjpe.12122
https://doi.org/10.3917/mav.092.0133
https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-10-2015-0052
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-05-2016-0091
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2017.02.003
https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(1).2017.05
https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-373220160000019001
https://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF-10-2016-0077
457. Ching-Ping Wang, Hung-Hsi Huang, Jin-Sheng Hu. 2017. Reverse-Engineering and Real Options–
Adjusted CAPM in the Taiwan Stock Market. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 53:3, 670-687.
[Crossref]
458. Supriya Maheshwari, Raj Singh Dhankar. 2017. Momentum anomaly: evidence from the Indian stock
market. Journal of Advances in Management Research 14:1, 3-22. [Crossref]
459. Bin Mei. 2017. Investment returns of US commercial timberland: insights into index construction
methods and results. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 47:2, 226-233. [Crossref]
460. Shaista Arshad. Investigating the Integration 85-118. [Crossref]
461. Raquel J. Fonseca. Capital Asset Pricing Model—A Structured Robust Approach 385-392. [Crossref]
462. Efundem Agboraw, Aled Jones. Finance and Natural Resource Constraints 41-91. [Crossref]
463. Imad A. Moosa, Vikash Ramiah. The Rise and Fall of Neoclassical Finance 1-25. [Crossref]
464. Mª José Martínez Romero, Alfonso A. Rojo Ramírez. 2017. Socioemotional wealth’s implications in
the calculus of the minimum rate of return required by family businesses’ owners. Review of Managerial
Science 11:1, 95-118. [Crossref]
465. . Bibliography 315-328. [Crossref]
466. Numan Ülkü. 2017. Monday effect in Fama–French’s RMW factor. Economics Letters 150, 44-47.
[Crossref]
467. Richard C. Thompson, Yi Su, Gunnar Lucko. 2017. Measuring Project Performance Inspired by
Stock Index. Procedia Engineering 196, 706-713. [Crossref]
468. Steven R. Ratner. 2017. Compensation for Expropriations in a World of Investment Treaties: Beyond
the Lawful/Unlawful Distinction. American Journal of International Law 111:1, 7-56. [Crossref]
469. Ricardo G. Barcelona. Doing the Managerial Flexibility Maths 455-472. [Crossref]
470. Arun Muralidhar, Robert Savickas, Tzu-Jui Mao. 2017. Asset Pricing Anomalies: Two Hedge Factors
with Negative Risk Premia Embedded in Portfolios!. SSRN Electronic Journal 12. . [Crossref]
471. Pablo Fernandez. 2017. Finanzas y Economma Financiera (Finance and Financial Economics). SSRN
Electronic Journal 32. . [Crossref]
472. Pablo Fernandez. 2017. Finance and Financial Economics: A Debate About Common Sense and
Illogical Models. SSRN Electronic Journal 32. . [Crossref]
473. Kulab Jamar. 2017. Property Funds and REITs in Thailand: A CAPM Investigation. SSRN Electronic
Journal 2. . [Crossref]
474. Ming Li Chew, Sahil Puri. 2017. Using Natural Language Processing Techniques for Stock Return
Predictions. SSRN Electronic Journal 5. . [Crossref]
475. Seung C. Ahn, Alex R. Horenstein. 2017. Asset Pricing and Excess Returns Over the Market Return.
SSRN Electronic Journal 81. . [Crossref]
476. Gevorg Hunanyan. 2017. The Systematic Risk of Short-Sale Restrictions. SSRN Electronic Journal
45. . [Crossref]
477. Mike Ward, Chris Muller, Pravin Semnarayan. 2017. Negative Investment Returns in a Developing
Market Context. SSRN Electronic Journal 69. . [Crossref]
478. Eben Otuteye. 2017. Re-Evaluating the Value of Modern Portfolio Theory and Asset Pricing Models
Based on Behavioral Insights from Benjamin Graham's Value Investing Paradigm. SSRN Electronic
Journal 38. . [Crossref]
479. Min Deng. 2017. Death of the Capital Asset Pricing Model. SSRN Electronic Journal 6. . [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2016.1193484
https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-11-2015-0081
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2016-0186
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47803-6_6
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67308-0_39
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67753-8_3
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69389-7_1
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-015-0181-9
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812587-8.16001-0
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.10.031
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.237
https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2016.2
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59139-5_16
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2899418
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2900438
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2906887
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2907400
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2940564
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2942537
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2958122
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2965628
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2980453
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3021729
480. Eben Otuteye, Mohammad Siddiquee. 2017. A Critique of Modern Portfolio Theory and Asset
Pricing Models Based on Behavioral Insights from Benjamin Graham's Value Investing Paradigm.
SSRN Electronic Journal 38. . [Crossref]
481. Jose Maria Diez Esteban, Conrado DiegoGarcca-GGmez, FFlix J. LLpez-Iturriaga, Marcos
Santamarra-Mariscal. 2017. Corporate Risk-Taking, Returns and the Nature of Major Shareholders:
Evidence from Prospect Theory. SSRN Electronic Journal 34. . [Crossref]
482. Samuel Johnson, David Tuckett. 2017. Narrative Decision-Making in Investment Choices: How
Investors Use News About Company Performance. SSRN Electronic Journal 8. . [Crossref]
483. Johnny Kang, Tom B. Parker, Scott Radell, Ralph Smith. 2017. Reach for Safety. SSRN Electronic
Journal 51. . [Crossref]
484. Arun Muralidhar. 2017. A Very Simple Goals - and Risk-Based Asset Pricing Model (or Asset Pricing
with Heterogeneous Investors). SSRN Electronic Journal 80. . [Crossref]
485. Eben Otuteye, Mohammad Siddiquee. 2017. Buffett's Alpha: Further Explanations from Behavioral
Value Investing Perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal 42. . [Crossref]
486. Imran Riaz Malik, Attaullah Shah. 2017. Single Stock Futures and Their Impact on Risk
Characteristics of the Underlying Stocks: A Dynamic CAPM Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal
59. . [Crossref]
487. James Ming Chen. 2017. Baryonic Beta Dynamics: An Econophysical Model of Systematic Risk.
SSRN Electronic Journal 9.
,. [Crossref]
488. Antonio Amendola, Dennis Marco Montagna, Mario Maggi. 2017. Analysis of Equity &946ن;
Principal Components in Low Risk Framework: New Results and Prospectives. SSRN Electronic
Journal 77. . [Crossref]
489. Yehuda (Yud) Izhakian. 2017. Knight Meets Sharpe: Capital Asset Pricing under Ambiguity. SSRN
Electronic Journal 77. . [Crossref]
490. Pieter Klaassen, Idzard van Eeghen. 2017. Bank Capital Allocation and Performance Management
under Multiple Capital Constraints. SSRN Electronic Journal 4. . [Crossref]
491. Jessie Y. Zhu, Wally Smieliauskas. 2017. Evidence on the Economic Consequences of Marriage
Equality and LGBT Human Rights. SSRN Electronic Journal 5. . [Crossref]
492. Gastón Silverio Milanesi. 2017. DESCUENTO DE FLUJO DE FONDOS E INFLACIÓN PARA
LA VALORACIÓN DE EMPRESAS EN DOS MONEDAS. Semestre Económico 20:44, 189-218.
[Crossref]
493. Prashant Das, Gabrielle Bodenmann. Minimizing the Cost of Capital in Hotel Investments 191-207.
[Crossref]
494. Emon Kalyan Chowdhury. 2017. Functioning of Fama-French Three-Factor Model in Emerging
Stock Markets: An Empirical Study on Chittagong Stock Exchange, Bangladesh. Journal of Financial
Risk Management 06:04, 352-363. [Crossref]
495. José Carlos de Souza Santos, Elias Cavalcante Filho. 2017. Investing on the CAPM Pricing Error.
Technology and Investment 08:01, 67-82. [Crossref]
496. Daniel Andrei, Julien Cujean, Mungo Ivor Wilson. 2017. The Lost Capital Asset Pricing Model.
SSRN Electronic Journal 53. . [Crossref]
497. Wei Liu, James W. Kolari. 2017. Do Multi-Factors Proxy More Efficient Market Indexes?. SSRN
Electronic Journal 77. . [Crossref]
498. David J. Moore. 2016. A look at the actual cost of capital of US firms. Cogent Economics & Finance
4:1, 1233628. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3031382
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3035966
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3037463
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3037745
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3051726
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3054245
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3054618
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3062414
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3069831
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3074917
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3079003
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3080726
https://doi.org/10.22395/seec.v20n44a9
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1054-3.ch008
https://doi.org/10.4236/jfrm.2017.64025
https://doi.org/10.4236/ti.2017.81006
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2922598
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3086832
https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2016.1233628
499. Igor Deplano, Giovanni Squillero, Alberto Tonda. 2016. Anatomy of a portfolio optimizer under a
limited budget constraint. Evolutionary Intelligence 9:4, 125-136. [Crossref]
500. Eric Le Fur, Hachmi Ben Ameur, Benoit Faye. 2016. Time-Varying Risk Premiums in the Framework
of Wine Investment. Journal of Wine Economics 11:3, 355-378. [Crossref]
501. Mareike Hornung, Robert Luther, Peter Schuster. 2016. Retrievability bias in explaining the hurdle
rate premium puzzle. Journal of Applied Accounting Research 17:4, 440-455. [Crossref]
502. Remmer Sassen, Anne-Kathrin Hinze, Inga Hardeck. 2016. Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in
Europe. Journal of Business Economics 86:8, 867-904. [Crossref]
503. Marie-Claude Beaulieu, Marie-Hélène Gagnon, Lynda Khalaf. 2016. Less is more: Testing financial
integration using identification-robust asset pricing models. Journal of International Financial Markets,
Institutions and Money 45, 171-190. [Crossref]
504. Te-Feng Chen, San-Lin Chung, Wei-Che Tsai. 2016. Option-Implied Equity Risk and the Cross
Section of Stock Returns. Financial Analysts Journal 72:6, 42-55. [Crossref]
505. W. D. Chen, H. C. Li. 2016. Wavelet decomposition of heterogeneous investment horizon. Journal
of Economics and Finance 40:4, 714-734. [Crossref]
506. Brad M. Barber, Xing Huang, Terrance Odean. 2016. Which Factors Matter to Investors? Evidence
from Mutual Fund Flows. Review of Financial Studies 29:10, 2600-2642. [Crossref]
507. Nicholas G. Hall. Research and Teaching Opportunities in Project Management 329-388. [Crossref]
508. Thomas Lindner, Jakob Muellner, Jonas Puck. 2016. Cost of Capital in an International Context:
Institutional Distance, Quality, and Dynamics. Journal of International Management 22:3, 234-248.
[Crossref]
509. Richard J. Agnello. 2016. Do U.S. paintings follow the CAPM? Findings disaggregated by subject,
artist, and value of the work. Research in Economics 70:3, 403-411. [Crossref]
510. Celine Gimet, Sandra Montchaud. 2016. What Drives European Football Clubs’ Stock Returns and
Volatility?. International Journal of the Economics of Business 23:3, 351-390. [Crossref]
511. Robert F. Engle. 2016. Dynamic Conditional Beta. Journal of Financial Econometrics 14:4, 643-667.
[Crossref]
512. Claes Fornell, Forrest V. Morgeson, G. Tomas M. Hult. 2016. Stock Returns on Customer Satisfaction
Do Beat the Market: Gauging the Effect of a Marketing Intangible. Journal of Marketing 80:5, 92-107.
[Crossref]
513. Rajesh H Acharya, Anver C Sadath. 2016. On the interaction between energy price and firm size in
Indian economy. OPEC Energy Review 40:3, 300-315. [Crossref]
514. Paul Windolf. 2016. Riding the Bubble: Financial Market Crises in Twenty-Two OECD Countries.
Journal of Economic Issues 50:3, 788-813. [Crossref]
515. SWARN CHATTERJEE, AMY HUBBLE. 2016. DAY-OF-THE-WEEK EFFECT IN US
BIOTECHNOLOGY STOCKS — DO POLICY CHANGES AND ECONOMIC CYCLES
MATTER?. Annals of Financial Economics 11:02, 1650008. [Crossref]
516. Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad, Saniya Khalid, Saba Ameer. 2016. CAPM estimates: Can data frequency
and time period lend a hand?. International Journal of Financial Engineering 03:02, 1650018. [Crossref]
517. Mohammad Iftekhar Khan, Amit Banerji. 2016. Corporate Governance and Foreign Investment in
India. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance 9:1, 19-43. [Crossref]
518. Robert East. 2016. Bias in the evaluation of research methods. Marketing Theory 16:2, 219-231.
[Crossref]
519. ,Why Do Some Asset Pricing Models Perform Poorly? Evidence from Irrationality .2016 .ننن ,نن
Transaction Costs, and Missing Factors. Seoul Journal of Business 22:1, 1-64. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-016-0144-3
https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2016.15
https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-08-2015-0065
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-016-0819-3
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2016.07.007
https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v72.n6.2
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-015-9321-y
https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhw054
https://doi.org/10.1287/educ.2016.0146
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2016.01.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2016.06.002
https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2016.1204686
https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbw006
https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0229
https://doi.org/10.1111/opec.12080
https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2016.1213588
https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010495216500081
https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424786316500183
https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686216635786
https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593115609797
https://doi.org/10.35152/snusjb.2016.22.1.001
520. Won Kang, Jungsoon Shin. 2016. Derivation of Corporate Debt Pricing Model and Its Empirical
Implications. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies 45:3, 439-462. [Crossref]
521. Carmine De Franco, Bruno Monnier, Ksenya Rulik. 2016. Factor Exposure of Alternative Beta
Strategiesacross Market Regimes. The Journal of Index Investing 7:1, 78-91. [Crossref]
522. . Index 331-338. [Crossref]
523. . References 319-322. [Crossref]
524. Amabile Millani Rebeschini, Ricardo P. C. Leal. 2016. Stock Fund Returns and Macroeconomic
Variables in Brazil. Latin American Business Review 17:2, 139-161. [Crossref]
525. Christian Fieberg, Armin Varmaz, Thorsten Poddig. 2016. Covariances vs. characteristics: what does
explain the cross section of the German stock market returns?. Business Research 9:1, 27-50. [Crossref]
526. Iman Mirzadeh, Bjorn Birgisson. 2016. Evaluation of Highway Projects under Government Support
Mechanisms Based on an Option-Pricing Framework. Journal of Construction Engineering and
Management
,142:4. . [Crossref]
527. Mathijs Cosemans, Rik Frehen, Peter C. Schotman, Rob Bauer. 2016. Estimating Security Betas
Using Prior Information Based on Firm Fundamentals. Review of Financial Studies 29:4, 1072-1112.
[Crossref]
528. Hakan Bilir. 2016. Finansal Varl?klar? Fiyatlama Modelinin Analizi. International Journal of Finance
& Banking Studies (2147-4486) 5:2, 58-72. [Crossref]
529. Dawood Ashraf. 2016. Does Shari’ah Screening Cause Abnormal Returns? Empirical Evidence from
Islamic Equity Indices. Journal of Business Ethics 134:2, 209-228. [Crossref]
530. Marshall L. Stocker. 2016. The price of freedom: A Fama–French freedom factor. Emerging Markets
Review 26, 1-19. [Crossref]
531. . References 549-561. [Crossref]
532. Ton van den Bremer, Frederick van der Ploeg, Samuel Wills. 2016. The Elephant In The Ground:
Managing Oil And Sovereign Wealth. European Economic Review 82, 113-131. [Crossref]
533. Ran Leshem, Lisa R. Goldberg, Alan Cummings. 2016. Optimizing Value. The Journal of Portfolio
Management 42:2, 77-89. [Crossref]
534. Ran Leshem, Lisa R Goldberg, Alan Cummings. 2016. Optimizing Value. The Journal of Portfolio
Management . [Crossref]
535. Pertti Lahdenperä. 2016. Preparing a framework for two-stage target-cost arrangement formulation.
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 9:1, 123-146. [Crossref]
536. Nikodem Szumilo, Pascal Gantenbein, Werner Gleißner, Thomas Wiegelmann. 2016. Predicting
uncertainty: the impact of risk measurement on value of real estate portfolios. Journal of Property
Research 33:1, 1-17. [Crossref]
537. Jean-Luc Besson, Michel M. Dacorogna, Paolo de Martin, Michael Kastenholz, Michael Moller. How
Much Capital Does a Reinsurance Need? 235-253. [Crossref]
538. Arlie O. Petters, Xiaoying Dong. Capital Market Theory and Portfolio Risk Measures 151-208.
[Crossref]
539. Julius Hemminki, Vesa Puttonen. Fundamental Indexation in Europe 323-330. [Crossref]
540. Les Coleman. Current Paradigm: Neoclassical Investment Theory 15-28. [Crossref]
541. Mihály Ormos, Dusán Timotity. 2016. Generalized asset pricing: Expected Downside Risk-based
equilibrium modeling. Economic Modelling 52, 967-980. [Crossref]
542. Peter C. Dawson. 2016. Is Opportunity Cost Synonymous with Cost of Capital and Required Rate of
Return?: Untangling the Present Value Discount Rate. SSRN Electronic Journal 63. . [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12135
https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2016.7.1.078
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119212454.index
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119212454.refs
https://doi.org/10.1080/10978526.2016.1171719
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-016-0029-4
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001079
https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhv131
https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v5i2.126
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2422-2
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2016.02.004
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118656747.refs
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.10.005
https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2016.42.2.077
https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2016.2016.1.058
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-07-2015-0049
https://doi.org/10.1080/09599916.2016.1146790
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-57479-4_9
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3783-7_4
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30794-7_14
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43976-1_2
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.10.036
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2740757
543. Elena N. Asparouhova, Peter Bossaerts. 2016. Competitive Off-Equilibrium: Theory and Experiment.
SSRN Electronic Journal 115. . [Crossref]
544. Somayeh Moazeni. 2016. Risk-Averse Dynamic Arbitrage in Illiquid Markets. SSRN Electronic
Journal 1. . [Crossref]
545. John L. Glasco*ck. 2016. The Asymmetric Conditional Beta-Return Relations of REITs. SSRN
Electronic Journal 63. . [Crossref]
546. Gregory Gadzinski, Markus Schuller, Andrea Vacchino. 2016. The Global Capital Stock. A Proxy for
the Unobservable Global Market Portfolio. SSRN Electronic Journal 44. . [Crossref]
547. James Ming Chen. 2016. Baryonic Beta Dynamics: Splitting the Atom of Systematic Risk. SSRN
Electronic Journal 587. . [Crossref]
548. Paul Schneider, Christian Wagner, Josef Zechner. 2016. Low Risk Anomalies?. SSRN Electronic
Journal 98. . [Crossref]
549. Stefano Dova. 2016. From the CAPM to Fama-French: A Road Paved with Leverage. SSRN Electronic
Journal 43. . [Crossref]
550. Nadiyah Amatul Haq, Alvina Syafira Fauzia, Anggun Puspita Khoirunnisa. 2016. Promoting
Sustainable Financial System in Indonesia Towards SRI-KEHATI Index. SSRN Electronic Journal
18. . [Crossref]
551. Sabin Bikram Panta, Niranjan Phuyal, Rajesh Sharma, Gautam Vora. 2016. The Cross-Section of
Stock Returns: An Application of Fama-French Approach to Nepal. Modern Economy 07:02, 223-231.
[Crossref]
552. Nordine Abidi, Burcu Hacibedel, Mwanza Nkusu. 2016. Changing Times for Frontier Markets: A
Perspective from Portfolio Investment Flows and Financial Integration. IMF Working Papers 16:177,
1. [Crossref]
553. Iman MIRZADEH, Bjorn BIRGISSON. 2015. ACCOMMODATING ENERGY PRICE
VOLATILITY IN LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS OF ASPHALT PAVEMENTS. JOURNAL
OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT 22:8, 1001-1008. [Crossref]
554. David Geltner. 2015. Real Estate Price Indices and Price Dynamics: An Overview from an Investments
Perspective. Annual Review of Financial Economics 7:1, 615-633. [Crossref]
555. F. Echterling, B. Eierle, S. Ketterer. 2015. A review of the literature on methods of computing the
implied cost of capital. International Review of Financial Analysis 42, 235-252. [Crossref]
556. G. van Vuuren, R. Yacumakis. 2015. Hedge Fund Performance Evaluation Using the Kalman Filter.
Studies in Economics and Econometrics 39:3, 1-24. [Crossref]
557. Aris Spanos, Deborah G. Mayo. 2015. Error statistical modeling and inference: Where methodology
meets ontology. Synthese 192:11, 3533-3555. [Crossref]
558. Ozan Kocadağlı, Rıdvan Keskin. 2015. A novel portfolio selection model based on fuzzy goal
programming with different importance and priorities. Expert Systems with Applications 42:20,
6898-6912. [Crossref]
559. Gustavo A. Marrero, Luis A. Puch, Francisco J. Ramos-Real. 2015. Mean-variance portfolio methods
for energy policy risk management. International Review of Economics & Finance 40, 246-264.
[Crossref]
560. Fabian T. Lutzenberger. 2015. Multifactor Models and their Consistency with the ICAPM: Evidence
from the European Stock Market. European Financial Management 21:5, 1014-1052. [Crossref]
561. C. A. Valle, N. Meade, J. E. Beasley. 2015. Factor neutral portfolios. OR Spectrum 37:4, 843-867.
[Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2774301
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2786841
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2788368
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2808438
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2832735
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2858933
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2891356
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3347681
https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2016.72024
https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475529548.001
https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.945951
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-111914-041850
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2015.08.001
https://doi.org/10.1080/10800379.2015.12097283
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-0744-y
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.047
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2015.02.013
https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12050
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-015-0392-0
562. F. Echterling, B. Eierle. 2015. Mean reversion adjusted betas used in business valuation practice: a
research note. Journal of Business Economics 85:7, 759-792. [Crossref]
563. Marcelo Sandoval, Santiago Grijalva. Future grid business model innovation: A prosumer-based cost-
benefit framework for valuation of Distributed Energy Resources 450-455. [Crossref]
564. . Bibliography 443-445. [Crossref]
565. Nazeeruddin Mohammad, Dawood Ashraf. 2015. The market timing ability and return performance
of Islamic equities: An empirical study. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 34, 169-183. [Crossref]
566. Yasser Alhenawi. 2015. On the interaction between momentum effect and size effect.
,Review of
Financial Economics 26:1, 36-46. [Crossref]
567. Martin Širůček, Lukáš Křen. 2015. Application of Markowitz Portfolio Theory by Building Optimal
Portfolio on the US Stock Market. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis
63:4, 1375-1386. [Crossref]
568. Harry S. Marmer. 2015. Fire! Fire! Is U.S. Low Volatility a Crowded Trade?. The Journal of Investing
24:3, 17-37. [Crossref]
569. K. J. Barnard, M. B. Bunting. 2015. Value and size investment strategies during the global financial
crisis: evidence from the South African equity market. South African Journal of Accounting Research
29:2, 177-196. [Crossref]
570. Richard A. Michelfelder. 2015. Empirical analysis of the generalized consumption asset pricing model:
Estimating the cost of capital. Journal of Economics and Business 80, 37-50. [Crossref]
571. Ruggiero Cavallo, R. Preston Mcafee, Sergei Vassilvitskii. 2015. Display Advertising Auctions with
Arbitrage. ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation 3:3, 1-23. [Crossref]
572. Seungho Baek, John F.O. Bilson. 2015. Size and value risk in financial firms. Journal of Banking &
Finance 55, 295-326. [Crossref]
573. Yuntaek Pae, Navid Sabbaghi. 2015. Equally weighted portfolios vs value weighted portfolios: Reasons
for differing betas. Journal of Financial Stability 18, 203-207. [Crossref]
574. Shweta Bajpai, Anil K. Sharma. 2015. An Empirical Testing of Capital Asset Pricing Model in India.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 189, 259-265. [Crossref]
575. Roger Buckland, Julian Williams, Janice Beecher. 2015. Risk and regulation in water utilities: a cross-
country comparison of evidence from the CAPM. Journal of Regulatory Economics 47:2, 117-145.
[Crossref]
576. Lin Chen, Lu Qin, Hongquan Zhu. 2015. Opinion divergence, unexpected trading volume and stock
returns: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance 36, 119-127. [Crossref]
577. Philippe Bertrand, Vincent Lapointe. 2015. How performance of risk-based strategies is modified
by socially responsible investment universe?. International Review of Financial Analysis 38, 175-190.
[Crossref]
578. Hersh Shefrin. 2015. Investors' Judgments, Asset Pricing Factors and Sentiment. European Financial
Management 21:2, 205-227. [Crossref]
579. Jan Bastin. 2015. Volatility Effect: An Application on the German Stock Market. Český finanční a
účetní časopis 2015:1, 36-54. [Crossref]
580. Peter C. Dawson. 2015. The capital asset pricing model in economic perspective. Applied Economics
47:6, 569-598. [Crossref]
581. Jan Doppegieter. The Capital Asset Pricing Model 1-4. [Crossref]
582. Cherry Muijsson, Ed Fishwick, Steve Satchell. The Low Beta Anomaly and Interest Rates 305-328.
[Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-014-0750-4
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGT-LA.2015.7381197
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119202837.biblio
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2015.07.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2015.03.005
https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563041375
https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2015.24.3.017
https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2015.1006486
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2015.04.001
https://doi.org/10.1145/2668033
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.02.011
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2015.04.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.221
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-014-9261-z
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2014.11.012
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2014.11.009
https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12059
https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cfuc.435
https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.975333
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118785317.weom060020
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78548-008-9.50013-7
583. Maurício Vasconcellos Leão Lyrio, Wlademir Prates, Marcus Vinícius Andrade de Lima, Rogério João
Lunkes. 2015. Análise da implementação de uma estratégia de investimento em ações baseada em um
instrumento de apoio à decisão. Contaduría y Administración 60:1, 113-143. [Crossref]
584. Usman Ayub, Syed Zulfiqar Ali Shah, Qaisar Abbas. 2015. Robust analysis for downside risk in
portfolio management for a volatile stock market. Economic Modelling 44, 86-96. [Crossref]
585. Josanco Floreani, Maurizio Polato, Andrea Paltrinieri, Flavio Pichler. Credit Quality, Bank
Provisioning and Systematic Risk in Banking Business 1-34. [Crossref]
586. Federico Beltrame, Daniele Previtali, Luca Grassetti. The Estimation of Banks’ Cost of Capital
through the Capital at Risk Model: An Empirical Investigation across European Banks 35-65.
[Crossref]
587. Nuraini Ismail, Mohd Tahir Ismail, Samsul Ariffin Abdul Karim, Firdaus Mohamad Hamzah.
Modeling and forecasting the volatility of Islamic unit trust in Malaysia using GARCH model 050009.
[Crossref]
588. Michael Olbrich, Tobias Quill, David J. Rapp. 2015. Business Valuation Inspired by the Austrian
School. Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis 10:1, 1-43. [Crossref]
589. Sven Carlin. 2015. A Real Value Risk Estimation Model for an Emerging Market. SSRN Electronic
Journal 56. . [Crossref]
590. Todd Gerarden, Richard G. Newell, Robert N. Stavins. 2015. Assessing the Energy-Efficiency Gap.
SSRN Electronic Journal 101. . [Crossref]
591. Christian-Oliver Ewald, Pariya Salehi. 2015. Salmon Futures and the Fish Pool Market in the Context
of the CAPM and the Fama & French Three-Factor Model. SSRN Electronic Journal 8. . [Crossref]
592. John Griffin. 2015. Risk Premia and Knightian Uncertainty in an Experimental Market Featuring a
Long-Lived Asset. SSRN Electronic Journal 4. . [Crossref]
593. Danilo Tilloca. 2015. A Risk-Neutral Approach for the Evaluation of Commercial Loans. SSRN
Electronic Journal 44. . [Crossref]
594. Todd Gerarden, Richard G. Newell, Robert N. Stavins. 2015. Assessing the Energy-Efficiency Gap.
SSRN Electronic Journal 101. . [Crossref]
595. Ran Leshem, Lisa R. Goldberg, Alan Cummings. 2015. Optimizing Value. SSRN Electronic Journal
39. . [Crossref]
596. Daniel Felix Ahelegbey. 2015. The Econometrics of Networks: A Review. SSRN Electronic Journal
105. . [Crossref]
597. Piotr Wisniewski. 2015. The Valuation of Social Media Public Companies: There Is a Method to
This Madness!. SSRN Electronic Journal 18. . [Crossref]
598. MMrio Correia Fernandes. 2015. An Application of Risk-Return Metrics on Public-Private
Partnerships: The Case of Portuguese Road Sector. SSRN Electronic Journal 29. . [Crossref]
599. Marc K. Chan, Simon Kwok. 2015. The Effect of Risk Sharing on Asset Prices: Natural Experiment
from the Chinese Stock Market Liberalization. SSRN Electronic Journal 55. . [Crossref]
600. Christoph Becker, Wolfgang M. Schmidt. 2015. Value, Size, Momentum and the Average Correlation
of Stock Returns. SSRN Electronic Journal 31. . [Crossref]
601. Brandes Institute. 2015. Redefining Risk and Return in Common Stock Investment. SSRN Electronic
Journal 14. . [Crossref]
602. Pablo Fernandez. 2015. CAPM: An Absurd Model. Business Valuation Review 34:1, 4-23. [Crossref]
603. Marie-Claude Beaulieu, Jean-Marie Dufour, Lynda Khalaf. 2015. Identification-Robust Factor
Pricing: Canadian Evidence. L'Actualité économique 91:1-2, 235-252. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0186-1042(15)72149-2
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.10.001
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137530943_1
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137530943_2
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4932500
https://doi.org/10.1515/jbvela-2014-0001
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2553858
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2554735
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2567737
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2569462
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2576245
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2599532
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2603308
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2611915
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2629229
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2643440
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2669900
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2693190
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2983986
https://doi.org/10.5791/0882-2875-34.1.4
https://doi.org/10.7202/1036920ar
604. Marcus Schulmerich, Yves-Michel Leporcher, Ching-Hwa Eu. Modern Portfolio Theory and Its
Problems 101-173.
,[Crossref]
605. Dennis Schlegel. Background: Cost-of-Capital in the Finance Literature 9-70. [Crossref]
606. Virginie Coudert, Karine Hervé, Pierre Mabille. 2015. Internationalization Versus Regionalization in
the Emerging Stock Markets. International Journal of Finance & Economics 20:1, 16-27. [Crossref]
607. Petros Messis, Achilleas Zapranis. 2014. Asset pricing with time-varying betas for stocks traded on
S&P 500. Applied Economics 46:36, 4508-4518. [Crossref]
608. Myuran Rajaratnam, Bala Rajaratnam, Kanshukan Rajaratnam. 2014. A novel equity valuation and
capital allocation model for use by long-term value-investors. Journal of Banking & Finance 49,
483-494. [Crossref]
609. Petros Messis, Achilleas Zapranis. 2014. Herding towards higher moment CAPM, contagion of
herding and macroeconomic shocks: Evidence from five major developed markets. Journal of Behavioral
and Experimental Finance 4, 1-13. [Crossref]
610. Claudio Morana. 2014. Insights on the global macro-finance interface: Structural sources of risk factor
fluctuations and the cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Empirical Finance 29, 64-79.
[Crossref]
611. Robin Zorzi, Bettina Friedl. 2014. The Optimal Hedge Ratio — An Analytical Decision Model
Considering Periodical Accounting Constraints. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies
17:04, 1450024. [Crossref]
612. Aidan Parkinson, Peter Guthrie. 2014. Evaluating the energy performance of buildings within a value
at risk framework with demonstration on UK offices. Applied Energy 133, 40-55. [Crossref]
613. Marek Kolodziej, Robert K. Kaufmann, Nalin Kulatilaka, David Bicchetti, Nicolas Maystre. 2014.
Crude oil: Commodity or financial asset?. Energy Economics 46, 216-223. [Crossref]
614. Janick Christian Mollet, Andreas Ziegler. 2014. Socially responsible investing and stock performance:
New empirical evidence for the US and European stock markets. Review of Financial Economics 23:4,
208-216. [Crossref]
615. Sangwon Suh, Wonho Song, Bong-Soo Lee. 2014. A new method for forming asset pricing factors
from firm characteristics. Applied Economics 46:28, 3463-3482. [Crossref]
616. Pei-Tha Gan. 2014. The precise form of financial integration: Empirical evidence for selected Asian
countries. Economic Modelling 42, 208-219. [Crossref]
617. Mario Filiasi, Giacomo Livan, Matteo Marsili, Maria Peressi, Erik Vesselli, Elia Zarinelli. 2014. On
the concentration of large deviations for fat tailed distributions, with application to financial data.
Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2014:9, P09030. [Crossref]
618. Terry Benzschawel,, Liang Fu,, Austin Murphy. 2014. An Empirical Analysis of Segmented Pricing
of Bond Systematic Risk. Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital 47:3, 439-464. [Crossref]
619. Carolin Fritzsche,, Lars Vandrei. 2014. Keiner will sie haben – Theoretische Ursachen für
Immobilienleerstand. Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital 47:3, 465-483. [Crossref]
620. Mary E. Barth, Eric C. So. 2014. Non-Diversifiable Volatility Risk and Risk Premiums at Earnings
Announcements. The Accounting Review 89:5, 1579-1607. [Crossref]
621. Richard A. Michelfelder. 2014. Asset characteristics of solar renewable energy certificates: market
solution to encourage environmental sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 4:3,
280-296. [Crossref]
622. J. Augusto Felício, Irina Ivashkovskaya, Ricardo Rodrigues, Anastasia Stepanova. 2014. Corporate
governance and performance in the largest European listed banks during the financial crisis. Innovar
24:53, 83-98. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55444-5_2
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15135-9_2
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1501
https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.964833
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.02.014
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2014.09.002
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2014.06.001
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219091514500246
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.074
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.09.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2014.08.003
https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.932049
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.07.003
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2014/09/P09030
https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.47.3.439
https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.47.3.465
https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50758
https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2014.946463
https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v24n53.43914
623. Duc Hung Tran. 2014. Multiple corporate governance attributes and the cost of capital – Evidence
from Germany. The British Accounting Review 46:2, 179-197. [Crossref]
624. Urs von Arx, Andreas Ziegler. 2014. The effect of corporate social responsibility on stock
performance: new evidence for the USA and Europe. Quantitative Finance 14:6, 977-991. [Crossref]
625. Austin Murphy, Liang Fu, Terry Benzschawel. 2014. An Empirical Examination of Ex AnteEstimates
of the Market Risk Premium. The Journal of Investing 23:2, 51-58. [Crossref]
626. Debasish Majumder. 2014. Asset pricing for inefficient markets: Evidence from China and India. The
Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 54:2, 282-291. [Crossref]
627. . Bibliography 1213-1238. [Crossref]
628. Yi-Cheng Shih, Sheng-Syan Chen, Cheng-Few Lee, Po-Jung Chen. 2014. The evolution of capital
asset pricing models. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 42:3, 415-448. [Crossref]
629. Kao-Yi Shen, Min-Ren Yan, Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng. 2014. Combining VIKOR-DANP model for
glamor stock selection and stock performance improvement. Knowledge-Based Systems 58, 86-97.
[Crossref]
630. Madhu Acharyya, Chris Brady. 2014. Designing an Enterprise Risk Management Curriculum for
Business Studies: Insights From a Pilot Program. Risk Management and Insurance Review 17:1,
113-136. [Crossref]
631. Christoph Schwarzbach, Frederik Kunze, Norman Rudschuck, Torsten Windels. 2014. Stock
investments for German life insurers in the current low interest environment: more homework to do.
Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft 103:1, 45-63. [Crossref]
632. Ekaterina Svetlova. 2014. Modelling Beyond Application: Epistemic and Non-epistemic Values in
Modern Science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 28:1, 79-98. [Crossref]
633. Katsiaryna Salavei Bardos, Dev Mishra. 2014. Financial restatements, litigation and implied cost of
equity. Applied Financial Economics 24:1, 51-71. [Crossref]
634. Stefan Behringer. Kennzahlen im Konzerncontrolling 89-132. [Crossref]
635. Hersh Shefrin. Distinguishing Rationality and Bias in Prices: Implications from Judgments of Risk
and Expected Return 7-49. [Crossref]
636. Alfonso A. Rojo-Ramírez. 2014. Privately Held Company Valuation and Cost of Capital. Journal of
Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis 9:1, 1-21. [Crossref]
637. Pablo Koch-Medina, Jan Wenzelburger. 2014. Equilibria in the CAPM with Nontradeable
Endowments. SSRN Electronic Journal 59. . [Crossref]
638. Arun Muralidhar, Kazuhiko Ohashi, Sung Hwan Shin. 2014. The Relative Asset Pricing Model: The
Third Dimension. SSRN Electronic Journal 67. . [Crossref]
639. Robert F. Engle. 2014. Dynamic Conditional Beta. SSRN Electronic Journal 102. . [Crossref]
640. Ian Kaplan. 2014. Value Factors Do Not Forecast Returns for S&P 500 Stocks. SSRN Electronic
Journal 68. . [Crossref]
641. Marcio Andre Veras Machado, MMrcia Reis Machado. 2014. Liquidity and Asset Pricing: Evidence
from the Brazilian Market. SSRN Electronic Journal 20. . [Crossref]
642. Myuran Rajaratnam, Christo J. Auret, Robert William Vivian. 2014. Bashing Barmy Banks:
Rethinking Bank Valuation Models Post the Global Financial Crisis (GFC). SSRN Electronic Journal
14. . [Crossref]
643. Abel Rodriguez, Ziwei Wang, Athanasios Kottas. 2014. Assessing Systematic Risk in the S&P500
Index between 2000 and 2011: A Bayesian Nonparametric Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal 1. .
[Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.02.003
https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2013.815796
https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2014.23.2.051
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2013.12.007
,https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118846780.app1
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-013-0348-x
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.07.023
https://doi.org/10.1111/rmir.12019
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12297-013-0258-y
https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2014.915656
https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2013.864033
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41942-3_3
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137447623_2
https://doi.org/10.1515/jbvela-2013-0017
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2383761
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2399845
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2404020
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2407303
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2409396
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2418865
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2446739
644. Roberto Savona, Cesare Orsini. 2014. Taking the Right Course Navigating the ERC Universe. SSRN
Electronic Journal 91. . [Crossref]
645. William R. Pratt, Gokce Soydemir, Elena Bastida. 2014. Global Convergence of Health Care
Financing in OECD Countries: An Equilibrium Based Asset Pricing Approach. SSRN Electronic
Journal 22. . [Crossref]
646. Arun Muralidhar. 2014. Modern Prospect Theory: The Missing Link Between Modern Portfolio
Theory and Prospect Theory. SSRN Electronic Journal 27. . [Crossref]
647. ZZlia Cazalet, Thierry Roncalli. 2014. Facts and Fantasies About Factor Investing. SSRN Electronic
Journal 77. . [Crossref]
648. Yasser Alhenawi. 2014. On the Interaction between Momentum Effect and Size Effect. SSRN
Electronic Journal 9. . [Crossref]
649. Paola De Santis, Carlo Drago. 2014. Systematic Risk Asymmetry of the American Real Estate
Securities: Some New Econometric Evidences. SSRN Electronic Journal 117. . [Crossref]
650. David Geltner. 2014. Real Estate Price Indices and Price Dynamics: An Overview from an Investments
Perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal 19. . [Crossref]
651. Siti Hajar Nadrah Mohamad Ghouse, Noryati Ahmad. 2014. Conceptual Paper of the Trading
Strategy: Dogs of the Dow Theory (Dod). SSRN Electronic Journal 25. . [Crossref]
652. Lynda Khalaf. 2014. L’économétrie et l’évidence fallacieuse: erreurs et avancées. L'Actualité économique
90:1, 5. [Crossref]
653. René Aïd. A Review of Optimal Investment Rules in Electricity Generation 3-40. [Crossref]
654. Nicholas Apergis, James E. Payne. 2014. Resurrecting the size effect: Evidence from a panel nonlinear
cointegration model for the G7 stock markets. Review of Financial Economics 23:1, 46-53. [Crossref]
655. Stefan Lutz, Daniel Kleinfeldt. 2013. Risk as Determinant of Income and Cross-border Pricing of
Multinational Enterprises. Studies in Microeconomics 1:2, 185-212. [Crossref]
656. Andrew Walsh. 2013. Core–Satellite Strategies: Combining Stability and Opportunity in an ETF
Portfolio. The Journal of Index Investing 4:3, 50-53. [Crossref]
657. Andrés Mauricio Gómez Sánchez, José Gabriel Astaiza Gómez. 2013. Ciclo económico y prima por
riesgo en el mercado accionario colombiano. Ecos de Economía 17:37, 109-124. [Crossref]
658. Antonina Waszczuk. 2013. Do local or global risk factors explain the size, value and momentum
trading pay-offs on the Warsaw Stock Exchange?. Applied Financial Economics 23:19, 1497-1508.
[Crossref]
659. Shima Lashgari, Jurgita Antuchevičienė, Alireza Delavari, Omid Kheirkhah. 2013. BEYOND CAPM:
AN INNOVATIVE FACTOR MODEL TO OPTIMIZE THE RISK AND RETURN TRADE-
OFF. Journal of Business Economics and Management 15:4, 615-630. [Crossref]
660. Andreas Ehrenmann, Yves Smeers. 2013. Risk adjusted discounted cash flows in capacity expansion
models. Mathematical Programming 140:2, 267-293. [Crossref]
661. Bastiaan Pluijmers, Imke Hollander, Ramon Tol, Dimitris Melas. 2013. On the Commonality of
Characteristics of Managed Volatility Portfolios. The Journal of Investing 22:3, 86-98. [Crossref]
662. Stefan Lutz. 2013. Risk premia in multi-national enterprises. The North American Journal of Economics
and Finance 25, 293-305. [Crossref]
663. Markus Ampenberger, Thomas Schmid, Ann-Kristin Achleitner, Christoph Kaserer. 2013. Capital
structure decisions in family firms: empirical evidence from a bank-based economy. Review of
Managerial Science 7:3, 247-275. [Crossref]
664. YongHee Kim, MinChung Kim, John W. O'Neill. 2013. Advertising and Firm Risk: A Study of the
Restaurant Industry. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 30:5, 455-470. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2448832
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2468586
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2492603
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2524547
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2532066
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2533481
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2540742
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2697334
https://doi.org/10.7202/1026722ar
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7248-3_1
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2013.08.003
https://doi.org/10.1177/2321022213501258
https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2013.4.3.050
https://doi.org/10.17230/ecos.2013.37.5
https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2013.835478
https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2013.770789
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-013-0692-6
https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2013.22.3.086
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2012.06.016
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-011-0077-2
https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2013.803392
665. M.-C. Beaulieu, J.-M. Dufour, L. Khalaf. 2013. Identification-Robust Estimation and Testing of the
Zero-Beta CAPM. The Review of Economic Studies 80:3, 892-924. [Crossref]
666. Paulo Augusto P. Britto, Carlos Henrique Rocha. 2013. Determinação do valor da tarifa-leilão do
serviço de transporte de passageiros por ônibus: um modelo alternativo. Journal of Transport Literature
7:3, 177-191. [Crossref]
667. Will Gans, Beat Hintermann. 2013. Market Effects of Voluntary Climate Action by Firms: Evidence
from the Chicago Climate Exchange. Environmental and Resource Economics 55:2, 291-308. [Crossref]
668. Jaspal Singh, Kiranpreet Kaur. 2013. Testing the Performance of Graham’s Net Current Asset Value
Strategy in Indian Stock Market. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation 9:2,
171-179. [Crossref]
669. John H. Hall, Wim Westerman. Basic Risk Adjustment Techniques in Capital Budgeting 215-239.
[Crossref]
670. Robert B. Durand, Rick Newby, Leila Peggs, Michelle Siekierka. 2013. Personality. Journal of
Behavioral Finance 14:2, 116-133. [Crossref]
671. Pertti Lahdenperä. 2013. Determining ‘the most economically advantageous tender’ based on capability
and fee-percentage criteria. Journal of Public Procurement 13:4, 409-446. [Crossref]
672. Nicholas C. Barberis. 2013. Thirty Years of Prospect Theory in Economics: A Review and Assessment.
Journal of Economic Perspectives 27:1, 173-196. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
673. L. Peter Jennergren. 2013. Firm Valuation with Bankruptcy Risk. Journal of Business Valuation and
Economic Loss Analysis 8:1. . [Crossref]
674. Jian Zhou. 2013. Conditional market beta for REITs: A comparison of modeling techniques. Economic
Modelling 30, 196-204. [Crossref]
675. Nicolai Striewe, Nico Rottke, Joachim Zietz. 2013. The Impact of Institutional Ownership on REIT
Performance. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management 19:1, 17-30. [Crossref]
676. Arun Muralidhar, Kazuhiko Ohashi, Sung Hwan Shin. 2013. LDI: Does it Turn CAPM into RAPM?.
SSRN Electronic Journal 19. . [Crossref]
677. Marcio Andre Veras Machado, Otavio Ribeiro de Medeiros. 2013. Does the Liquidity Effect Exist in
the Brazilian Stock Market?. SSRN Electronic Journal 20. . [Crossref]
678. Argiro Svingou. 2013. Cross-Sectional Analysis of Stock Returns in Athens Stock Exchange for the
Period 2004-2011. SSRN Electronic Journal 9. . [Crossref]
679. Issam S. Strub. 2013. Tail Hedging Strategies. SSRN Electronic Journal 62. . [Crossref]
680. Gueorgui I. Kolev. 2013. Two Gold Return Puzzles. SSRN Electronic Journal 52. . [Crossref]
681. Philippe Bertrand, Vincent Lapointe. 2013. Socially Responsible Investment Performance: Impacts of
Weighting by Capitalization. SSRN Electronic Journal 17. . [Crossref]
682. Peter C. Dawson. 2013. An Economic Analysis of the Competitive Risk-Return Paradigm. SSRN
Electronic Journal 39. . [Crossref]
,683. Eben Otuteye, Mohammad Siddiquee. 2013. Redefining Risk: Propositions to Motivate a Re-
Examination of the Standard Risk vs. Return Relationship in Common Stock and Bond Portfolio
Management. SSRN Electronic Journal 14. . [Crossref]
684. Sabine Elmiger. 2013. Can CRRA Preferences Explain CAPM-Anomalies in the Cross-Section of
Stock Returns?. SSRN Electronic Journal 9. . [Crossref]
685. Deling Chen. 2013. Empirical Analysis of Stock Returns of Banks in China's A-Share Markets. SSRN
Electronic Journal 2. . [Crossref]
686. Muthucattu Thomas Paul, Fosuhene Akua Asarebea. 2013. Validity of the Capital Assets Pricing
Model: Evidence from the Indian Companies The NSE India. SSRN Electronic Journal 7. . [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rds044
https://doi.org/10.1590/S2238-10312013000300008
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9626-7
https://doi.org/10.1177/2319510X13504288
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118258422.ch12
https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2013.791294
https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-13-04-2013-B001
https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.27.1.173
http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdf/10.1257/jep.27.1.173
http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.27.1.173
https://doi.org/10.1515/jbvela-2013-0009
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.09.030
https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2013.12089939
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2211303
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2217941
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2244299
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2261831
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2266974
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2282372
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2285156
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2309763
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2312273
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2324640
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2324767
687. Jialiu Lu. 2013. The CAPM: A Reformulation. SSRN Electronic Journal 31. . [Crossref]
688. Kevin Kurt Robinson. 2013. Technical Analysis: Does Recent Market Data Substantiate the Efficient
Market Hypothesis?. SSRN Electronic Journal 27. . [Crossref]
689. Dinh Tran Ngoc Huy. 2013. The risk level of Vietnam non-banking investment and financial services
industry under financial leverage during and after the global crisis 2007-2011. Risk Governance and
Control: Financial Markets and Institutions 3:3, 48-55. [Crossref]
690. Imad A. Moosa. 2013. The Capital Asset Pricing Model ( CAPM ): The History of a Failed
Revolutionary Idea in Finance? Comments and Extensions. Abacus 49:S1, 62-68. [Crossref]
691. Joseph A. Cerniglia, Petter N. Kolm, Frank J. Fabozzi. Cross‐Sectional Factor‐Based Models and
Trading Strategies . [Crossref]
692. Hans Marius Eikseth, Snorre Lindset. 2012. Are taxes sufficient for CAPM rejection?. Applied
Economics Letters 19:18, 1813-1816. [Crossref]
693. Michael McKenzie, Ólan T. Henry. 2012. The determinants of short selling: evidence from the Hong
Kong equity market. Accounting & Finance 52:s1, 183-216. [Crossref]
694. Mohamed El Hedi Arouri, Duc Khuong Nguyen, Kuntara Pukthuanthong. 2012. An international
CAPM for partially integrated markets: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance
36:9, 2473-2493. [Crossref]
695. Moshe Levy. 2012. On the Spurious Correlation Between Sample Betas and Mean Returns. Applied
Mathematical Finance 19:4, 341-360. [Crossref]
696. Feng-jun Liu. An examination of CAPM based on data from Shenzhen Stock Exchange 1560-1566.
[Crossref]
697. S. Maier, A. Street. Model for the economic feasibility of energy recovery from municipal solid waste
in Brazil 1-10. [Crossref]
698. Saumya Ranjan Dash, Jitendra Mahakud. 2012. Investor sentiment, risk factors and stock return:
evidence from Indian non‐financial companies. Journal of Indian Business Research 4:3, 194-218.
[Crossref]
699. Tony Chieh‐Tse Hou. 2012. Return persistence and investment timing decisions in Taiwanese
domestic equity mutual funds. Managerial Finance 38:9, 873-891. [Crossref]
700. Iftekhar Hasan, Heiko Schmiedel, Liang Song. 2012. Returns to Retail Banking and Payments.
Journal of Financial Services Research 41:3, 163-195. [Crossref]
701. Raul Leote de Carvalho, Xiao Lu, Pierre Moulin. 2012. Demystifying Equity Risk–Based Strategies:
A Simple Alpha plus Beta Description. The Journal of Portfolio Management 38:3, 56-70. [Crossref]
702. Xiao Lu, Pierre Moulin. 2012. Demystifying Equity Risk–Based Strategies: A Simple Alpha plus
Beta Description. The Journal of Portfolio Management 120308233706009. [Crossref]
703. Manfred Gilli, Enrico Schumann. 2012. Heuristic optimisation in financial modelling. Annals of
Operations Research 193:1, 129-158. [Crossref]
704. Amit Goyal. 2012. Empirical cross-sectional asset pricing: a survey. Financial Markets and Portfolio
Management 26:1, 3-38. [Crossref]
705. Mohamed El Hedi Arouri, Philippe Foulquier. 2012. Financial market integration: Theory and
empirical results. Economic Modelling 29:2, 382-394. [Crossref]
706. Alexandros Kostakis, Kashif Muhammad, Antonios Siganos. 2012. Higher co-moments and asset
pricing on London Stock Exchange. Journal of Banking & Finance 36:3, 913-922. [Crossref]
707. Melih Madanoglu, Murat Kizildag, Ersem Karadag. 2012. Estimating Cost of Equity in the Restaurant
Industry: What IS Your Required Rate of Return?. The Journal of Hospitality Financial Management
20:1, 57-74. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2356256
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3093251
https://doi.org/10.22495/rgcv3i3art5
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2012.00385.x
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118182635.efm0054
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2012.657345
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2011.00437.x
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.05.004
https://doi.org/10.1080/1350486X.2011.624824
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSE.2012.6414381
https://doi.org/10.1109/TDC-LA.2012.6319061
https://doi.org/10.1108/17554191211252699
https://doi.org/10.1108/03074351211248207
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-011-0114-y
https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2012.38.3.056
https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2012.2012.1.023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-0862-y
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-011-0177-7
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2011.11.009
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.10.002
https://doi.org/10.1080/10913211.2012.10721891
708. Roger Dayala. 2012. The Capital Asset Pricing Model: A Fundamental Critique. Business Valuation
Review 31:1, 23-34. [Crossref]
709. Konstantinos A. Chrysafis. 2012. Corporate investment appraisal with possibilistic CAPM.
Mathematical and Computer Modelling 55:3-4, 1041-1050. [Crossref]
710. Yannick Malevergne, Didier Sornette. Multi‐moment Method for Portfolio Management: Generalised
Capital Asset Pricing Model in hom*ogeneous and Heterogeneous Markets 166-193. [Crossref]
711. . Bibliography 273-276. [Crossref]
712. . References 321-329. [Crossref]
713. Zhi Da, Re-Jin Guo, Ravi Jagannathan. 2012. CAPM for estimating the cost of equity capital:
Interpreting the empirical evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 103:1, 204-220. [Crossref]
714. Woraphon Wattanatorn, Termkiat Kanchanapoom. 2012. Oil Prices and Profitability Performance:
Sector Analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 40, 763-767. [Crossref]
715. Fernando Gómez-Bezares, Luis Ferruz, María Vargas. 2012. Can we beat the market with beta? An
intuitive test of the CAPM. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting / Revista Española de Financiación
y Contabilidad 41:155, 333-352. [Crossref]
716. Mary E. Barth, Eric C. So. 2012. Non-Diversifiable Volatility Risk and Risk Premiums at Earnings
Announcements. SSRN Electronic Journal 44. . [Crossref]
717. Giuseppe Marzo. 2012. A Theory-of-The-Firm Perspective on Discount Rates Formulation in
Investment Valuation. SSRN Electronic Journal 9. . [Crossref]
718. Jun Yuan, Leonard MacLean, Kuan Xu, Yonggan Zhao. 2012. How Do Local Markets Respond to
Global Risk Factor Differently in Various Market Regimes? A Study of Country Exchange Traded
Funds. SSRN Electronic Journal 61. . [Crossref]
719. Matthias Xaver Hanauer, Christoph Kaserer, Marc Steffen Rapp. 2012. Risikofaktoren und
Multifaktormodelle für den Deutschen
,Aktienmarkt (Risk Factors and Multi-Factor Models for the
German Stock Market). SSRN Electronic Journal 45. . [Crossref]
720. Min Bai. 2012. Short-Selling Status and Asset-Pricing Models. SSRN Electronic Journal 9. .
[Crossref]
721. Mike Ward, Chris Muller. 2012. Empirical Testing of the CAPM on the Johannesburg Stock
Exchange. SSRN Electronic Journal 61. . [Crossref]
722. M. Hashem Pesaran, Takashi Yamagata. 2012. Testing CAPM with a Large Number of Assets. SSRN
Electronic Journal 44. . [Crossref]
723. Zvika Afik, Yaron Lahav. 2012. Risk Transfer Valuation in Advance Pricing Agreements between
Multinational Enterprises and Tax Authorities. SSRN Electronic Journal 26. . [Crossref]
724. Lord Mensah, R. K. Avuglah, Vincent Dedu. 2012. Asset Allocation on the Ghana Stock Exchange.
SSRN Electronic Journal 18. . [Crossref]
725. Gohar G. Stepanyan. 2012. Revisiting Firm Life Cycle Theory for New Directions in Finance. SSRN
Electronic Journal 81. . [Crossref]
726. Myuran Rajaratnam, Balakanapathy Rajaratnam, Kanshukan Rajaratnam. 2012. Mauling Mr. Market:
Valuing Equity Capital of Businesses by Long-Term Value-Investors. SSRN Electronic Journal 33. .
[Crossref]
727. David Nanigian. 2012. Capitalizing on the Greatest Anomaly in Finance with Mutual Funds. SSRN
Electronic Journal 67. . [Crossref]
728. Saumya Ranjan Dash. 2012. Does Sentiment Risk Persist as Priced Risk Factor? A Multifactor
Approach for Stock Return. SSRN Electronic Journal 5. . [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.5791/BVR-D-12-00001.1
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2011.09.029
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119201830.ch7
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119200680.app1
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119197164.refs
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.08.011
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.263
https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2012.10779727
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1635584
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1710549
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1928290
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1960510
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2018043
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2018197
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2020423
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2034170
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2119248
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2126479
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2132051
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2141460
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2147817
729. Stefan Lutz. 2012. Risk Premia in Multi-National Enterprises. SSRN Electronic Journal 18. .
[Crossref]
730. Arun Muralidhar, Sung Hwan Shin. 2012. The Relative Asset Pricing Model Incorporating Liabilities
and Delegation to CIOs: Version 0.1. SSRN Electronic Journal jou_vol[1].xmlText. . [Crossref]
731. Thierry Roncalli, Guillaume Weisang. 2012. Risk Parity Portfolios with Risk Factors. SSRN Electronic
Journal 52. . [Crossref]
732. Roman Brückner, Patrick Lehmann, Richard Stehle. 2012. In Germany the CAPM is Alive and Well.
SSRN Electronic Journal 44. . [Crossref]
733. Nicholas Barberis. 2012. Thirty Years of Prospect Theory in Economics: A Review and Assessment.
SSRN Electronic Journal 46. . [Crossref]
734. Fabian Echterling, Brigitte Eierle. 2012. Implied Cost of Capital Under Heterogeneous Expectations.
SSRN Electronic Journal 18. . [Crossref]
735. javed bin kamal. 2012. Optimal Portfolio Selection in Ex Ante Stock Price Bubble and Furthermore
Bubble Burst Scenario from Dhaka Stock Exchange with Relevance to Sharpe’s Single Index Model.
SSRN Electronic Journal 31. . [Crossref]
736. Juan Mascareñas. 2012. Gestión De Carteras Ii: Modelo De Valoración De Activos (Portfolio
Management II: Capital Asset Pricing Model). SSRN Electronic Journal 47. . [Crossref]
737. Wilson N. Sy. 2012. Scale and Competition in Australian Superannuation. SSRN Electronic Journal
3. . [Crossref]
738. Yi-Jang Yu. 2012. The Asset Pricing System. Modern Economy 03:05, 473-480. [Crossref]
739. Pauline M. Ahern, Frank J. Hanley, Richard A. Michelfelder. 2011. New approach to estimating
the cost of common equity capital for public utilities. Journal of Regulatory Economics 40:3, 261-278.
[Crossref]
740. Steve Keen. 2011. Debunking Macroeconomics. Economic Analysis and Policy 41:3, 147-167. [Crossref]
741. Akhilesh Chandra, Alan Reinstein. 2011. Investment appeal of small growth stocks. Advances in
Accounting 27:2, 308-317. [Crossref]
742. Mathijs A. van Dijk. 2011. Is size dead? A review of the size effect in equity returns. Journal of Banking
& Finance 35:12, 3263-3274. [Crossref]
743. A Charteris, B Strydom. 2011. An Examination of the Volatility of South African Risk-Free Rate
Proxies: A Component Garch Analysis. Studies in Economics and Econometrics 35:3, 49-64. [Crossref]
744. Andreas Ziegler, Timo Busch, Volker H. Hoffmann. 2011. Disclosed corporate responses to climate
change and stock performance: An international empirical analysis. Energy Economics 33:6, 1283-1294.
[Crossref]
745. Ajit Dayanandan, Han Donker. 2011. Oil prices and accounting profits of oil and gas companies.
International Review of Financial Analysis 20:5, 252-257. [Crossref]
746. Fengjun Liu. Can the Industry Index Become Another Market Variable? Empirical Evidence from the
Listed Banks in Shanghai Stock Exchange 315-319. [Crossref]
747. S. Paulo. 2011. The South African Companies Act of 2008 (SACA2008), and the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act
of 2002. International Journal of Law and Management 53:5, 340-354. [Crossref]
748. Gerald Spindler. 2011. Behavioural Finance and Investor Protection Regulations. Journal of Consumer
Policy 34:3, 315-336. [Crossref]
749. Liu Feng-jun, Li Fei. Empirical study of investment performance on listed banks from Shanghai Stock
Exchange based on one-quarter holding period 932-937. [Crossref]
750. Norliza Muhamad Yusof, Maheran Mohd. Jaffar. Predicting the credit risk through Merton model
162-166. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2148341
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2150326
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2155159
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2161847
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2177288
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2190753
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2236118
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2313393
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2374930
https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2012.35062
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-011-9160-5
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0313-5926(11)50030-X
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2011.06.002
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.05.009
https://doi.org/10.1080/10800379.2011.12097225
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.03.007
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2011.05.004
https://doi.org/10.1109/BIFE.2011.34
https://doi.org/10.1108/17542431111166331
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-011-9165-6
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSE.2011.6070071
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBEIA.2011.6088795
751. TAEJUN (DAVID) LEE, ERIC HALEY, TAI WOONG YUN, WONJUN CHUNG. 2011.
US Retirement Financial Services Advertising's Financial Information Provisions, Communication
Strategies and Judgmental Heuristic Cues. Journal of Consumer Affairs 45:3, 391-418. [Crossref]
752. Baibing Li, Xiangkang Yin. 2011. Information and capital asset pricing. The European Journal of
Finance 17:7, 505-523. [Crossref]
753. Cristian Diego Albuja, Fabio Gallo Garcia, Luiz Maurício Franco Moreiras, Elmo Tambosi Filho.
2011. Onde investir nos BRICS? Uma análise sob o prisma da organização industrial. Revista de
Administração de Empresas 51:4, 349-369. [Crossref]
754. Mohamed El Hedi Arouri. 2011. Does crude oil move stock markets in Europe? A sector investigation.
Economic Modelling 28:4, 1716-1725. [Crossref]
755. Konstantinos Kassimatis. 2011. Risk Aversion with Local Risk Seeking and Stock Returns: Evidence
from the UK Market. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 38:5-6, 713-739. [Crossref]
756. Duc Hung Tran. 2011. Corporate Governance und Eigenkapitalkosten - Bestandsaufnahme
des Schrifttums unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Informationsaspektes und
Forschungsperspektiven. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 81:5, 551-585. [Crossref]
757. Tanja Hribernik, Uroš Vek. 2011. Mutual Fund Performance in Slovenia: An Analysis of Mutual
Funds with Investment Policies in Europe
,such as industry effects in average returns. Positive
correlation in the residuals produces downward bias in the usual ordinary least
squares estimates of the standard errors of the cross-section regression slopes.
To improve the precision of estimated betas, researchers such as Blume
(1970), Friend and Blume (1970) and Black, Jensen and Scholes (1972) work with
portfolios, rather than individual securities. Since expected returns and market
betas combine in the same way in portfolios, if the CAPM explains security returns
it also explains portfolio returns.4 Estimates of beta for diversified portfolios are
more precise than estimates for individual securities. Thus, using portfolios in
cross-section regressions of average returns on betas reduces the critical errors in
variables problem. Grouping, however, shrinks the range of betas and reduces
statistical power. To mitigate this problem, researchers sort securities on beta when
forming portfolios; the first portfolio contains securities with the lowest betas, and
so on, up to the last portfolio with the highest beta assets. This sorting procedure
is now standard in empirical tests.
Fama and MacBeth (1973) propose a method for addressing the inference
problem caused by correlation of the residuals in cross-section regressions. Instead
of estimating a single cross-section regression of average monthly returns on betas,
they estimate month-by-month cross-section regressions of monthly returns on
betas. The times-series means of the monthly slopes and intercepts, along with the
standard errors of the means, are then used to test whether the average premium
for beta is positive and whether the average return on assets uncorrelated with the
market is equal to the average risk-free interest rate. In this approach, the standard
errors of the average intercept and slope are determined by the month-to-month
variation in the regression coefficients, which fully captures the effects of residual
correlation on variation in the regression coefficients, but sidesteps the problem of
actually estimating the correlations. The residual correlations are, in effect, cap-
tured via repeated sampling of the regression coefficients. This approach also
becomes standard in the literature.
Jensen (1968) was the first to note that the Sharpe-Lintner version of the
4 Formally, if xip, i � 1, . . . , N, are the weights for assets in some portfolio p, the expected return and
market beta for the portfolio are related to the expected returns and betas of assets as
E�Rp� � �
i�1
N
xipE�Ri�, and �pM � �
i�1
N
xip�pM .
Thus, the CAPM relation between expected return and beta,
E�Ri� � E�Rf� � �E�RM� � E�Rf���iM ,
holds when asset i is a portfolio, as well as when i is an individual security.
32 Journal of Economic Perspectives
relation between expected return and market beta also implies a time-series re-
gression test. The Sharpe-Lintner CAPM says that the expected value of an asset’s
excess return (the asset’s return minus the risk-free interest rate, Rit � Rft) is
completely explained by its expected CAPM risk premium (its beta times the
expected value of RMt � Rft). This implies that “Jensen’s alpha,” the intercept term
in the time-series regression,
�Time-Series Regression� Rit � Rft � �i � �iM �RMt � Rft � � �it ,
is zero for each asset.
The early tests firmly reject the Sharpe-Lintner version of the CAPM. There is
a positive relation between beta and average return, but it is too “flat.” Recall that,
in cross-section regressions, the Sharpe-Lintner model predicts that the intercept is
the risk-free rate and the coefficient on beta is the expected market return in excess
of the risk-free rate, E(RM) � Rf. The regressions consistently find that the
intercept is greater than the average risk-free rate (typically proxied as the return
on a one-month Treasury bill), and the coefficient on beta is less than the average
excess market return (proxied as the average return on a portfolio of U.S. common
stocks minus the Treasury bill rate). This is true in the early tests, such as Douglas
(1968), Black, Jensen and Scholes (1972), Miller and Scholes (1972), Blume and
Friend (1973) and Fama and MacBeth (1973), as well as in more recent cross-
section regression tests, like Fama and French (1992).
The evidence that the relation between beta and average return is too flat is
confirmed in time-series tests, such as Friend and Blume (1970), Black, Jensen and
Scholes (1972) and Stambaugh (1982). The intercepts in time-series regressions of
excess asset returns on the excess market return are positive for assets with low betas
and negative for assets with high betas.
Figure 2 provides an updated example of the evidence. In December of each
year, we estimate a preranking beta for every NYSE (1928–2003), AMEX (1963–
2003) and NASDAQ (1972–2003) stock in the CRSP (Center for Research in
Security Prices of the University of Chicago) database, using two to five years (as
available) of prior monthly returns.5 We then form ten value-weight portfolios
based on these preranking betas and compute their returns for the next twelve
months. We repeat this process for each year from 1928 to 2003. The result is
912 monthly returns on ten beta-sorted portfolios. Figure 2 plots each portfolio’s
average return against its postranking beta, estimated by regressing its monthly
returns for 1928–2003 on the return on the CRSP value-weight portfolio of U.S.
common stocks.
The Sharpe-Lintner CAPM predicts that the portfolios plot along a straight
5 To be included in the sample for year t, a security must have market equity data (price times shares
outstanding) for December of t � 1, and CRSP must classify it as ordinary common equity. Thus, we
exclude securities such as American Depository Receipts (ADRs) and Real Estate Investment Trusts
(REITs).
The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence 33
line, with an intercept equal to the risk-free rate, Rf , and a slope equal to the
expected excess return on the market, E(RM) � Rf. We use the average one-month
Treasury bill rate and the average excess CRSP market return for 1928–2003 to
estimate the predicted line in Figure 2. Confirming earlier evidence, the relation
between beta and average return for the ten portfolios is much flatter than the
Sharpe-Lintner CAPM predicts. The returns on the low beta portfolios are too high,
and the returns on the high beta portfolios are too low. For example, the predicted
return on the portfolio with the lowest beta is 8.3 percent per year; the actual return
is 11.1 percent. The predicted return on the portfolio with the highest beta is
16.8 percent per year; the actual is 13.7 percent.
Although the observed premium per unit of beta is lower than the Sharpe-
Lintner model predicts, the relation between average return and beta in Figure 2
is roughly linear. This is consistent with the Black version of the CAPM, which
predicts only that the beta premium is positive. Even this less restrictive model,
however, eventually succumbs to the data.
Testing Whether Market Betas Explain Expected Returns
The Sharpe-Lintner and Black versions of the CAPM share the prediction that
the market portfolio is mean-variance-efficient. This implies that differences in
expected return across securities and portfolios are entirely explained by differ-
ences in market beta; other variables should add nothing to the explanation of
expected return. This prediction plays a prominent role in tests of the CAPM. In
the early work, the weapon of choice is cross-section regressions.
In the framework of Fama and MacBeth (1973), one simply adds predeter-
mined explanatory variables to the month-by-month cross-section regressions of
Figure 2
Average Annualized Monthly Return versus Beta for Value Weight Portfolios
Formed on Prior Beta, 1928–2003
Average returns
predicted by the
CAPM
0.5
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9
A
ve
ra
ge
a
n
n
ua
liz
ed
m
on
th
ly
r
et
ur
n
(
%
)
34 Journal of Economic
,and the Energy Sector. South East European Journal of
Economics and Business 6:1, 61-69. [Crossref]
758. Simon Huston, Clive Warren, Peter Elliott. 2011. Elixir or delusion. Journal of Property Investment
& Finance 29:1, 49-58. [Crossref]
759. . Bibliography 563-576. [Crossref]
760. Robert B. Durand, Yihui Lan, Andrew Ng. 2011. Conditional beta: Evidence from Asian emerging
markets. Global Finance Journal 22:2, 130-153. [Crossref]
761. Amir Amel-Zadeh. 2011. The Return of the Size Anomaly: Evidence from the German Stock Market.
European Financial Management 17:1, 145-182. [Crossref]
762. Michael A. Crain. 2011. A Literature Review of the Size Effect. SSRN Electronic Journal 5. . [Crossref]
763. Marie-Claude Beaulieu, Jean-Marie Dufour, Lynda Khalaf. 2011. Identification-Robust Estimation
and Testing of the Zero-Beta CAPM. SSRN Electronic Journal 14. . [Crossref]
764. Mohammad Ali Tareq, Saburo Horimoto. 2011. Can We Use Historical Mean Returns?. SSRN
Electronic Journal 28. . [Crossref]
765. Alfonso A. Rojo Rojo-Ramirez, Salvador Cruz-Rambaud Cruz-Rambaud, Juana Alonso Canadas.
2011. A Note on the Operating Return of a Company Under Modigliani-Miller Assumptions. SSRN
Electronic Journal 60. . [Crossref]
766. Lammertjan Dam, Pim Heijnen. 2011. Asset Pricing with Fixed Asset Supply. SSRN Electronic
Journal 45. . [Crossref]
767. Maria de Lourdes Trevino. 2011. Time Varying Arbitrage Pricing Factors in the Mexican Stock
Market. SSRN Electronic Journal 5. . [Crossref]
768. Baitshepi Tebogo. 2011. Valuing Securities and Managing Portfolios Under Uncertainty: A Reminder
of the Underlying Assumptions. SSRN Electronic Journal 25. . [Crossref]
769. Myuran Rajaratnam, Balakanapathy Rajaratnam, Kanshukan Rajaratnam. 2011. Murdering Mr.
Market: An Equity Valuation and Capital Allocation Model for Long-Term Value-Investors. SSRN
Electronic Journal 81. . [Crossref]
770. Linda H. Chen, Lucia Silva Gao. 2011. The Pricing of Climate Risk. SSRN Electronic Journal 47. .
[Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2011.01210.x
https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2010.495476
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902011000400004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2011.02.039
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2011.02243.x
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-011-0461-z
https://doi.org/10.2478/v10033-011-0006-y
https://doi.org/10.1108/14635781111100191
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375662-6.00016-X
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2011.10.004
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2010.00581.x
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1710076
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1759960
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1772749
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1825821
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1914487
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1929141
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1933840
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1935365
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1940727
771. Stefan Lutz. 2011. Simultaneous Determination of Market Value and Risk Premium in the Valuation
of Firms. SSRN Electronic Journal 5. . [Crossref]
772. Muhammad Hanif, Abubakar Javaid Dar. 2011. Comparative Testing of Capital Asset Pricing Model
(CAPM) and Shari’a Compliant Asset Pricing Model (SCAPM): Evidence from Karachi Stock
Exchange - Pakistan. SSRN Electronic Journal 18. . [Crossref]
773. Tony Berrada, Reda Jürg Messikh, Gianluca Oderda, Olivier V. Pictet. 2011. Beta-Arbitrage
Strategies: When Do They Work, and Why?. SSRN Electronic Journal 9. . [Crossref]
774. Alfonso A. Rojo Rojo-Ramirez, Juana Alonso Canadas, Salvador Cruz-Rambaud Cruz-Rambaud.
2011. Discount Rate and Cost of Capital: Some More about the Puzzle. SSRN Electronic Journal
46. . [Crossref]
775. Nagendra Marisetty. 2011. An Empirical Study on CAPM with Respect to NSE NIFTY Stocks.
SSRN Electronic Journal 18. . [Crossref]
776. Maurizio Montone. 2011. The Puzzling Countercyclicality of the Value Premium: Empirics and a
Theory. SSRN Electronic Journal 69. . [Crossref]
777. Martin Grandes, Demian T. Panigo, Ricardo A. Pasquini. 2010. On the estimation of the cost of
equity in Latin America. Emerging Markets Review 11:4, 373-389. [Crossref]
778. Young-Soon Hwang, Hong-Ghi Min, Judith A. McDonald, Hwagyun Kim, Bong-Han Kim. 2010.
Using the credit spread as an option-risk factor: Size and value effects in CAPM. Journal of Banking
& Finance 34:12, 2995-3009. [Crossref]
779. Ravi Jagannathan, Ernst Schaumburg, Guofu Zhou. 2010. Cross-Sectional Asset Pricing Tests.
Annual Review of Financial Economics 2:1, 49-74. [Crossref]
780. Maria Elena De Giuli, Mario Alessandro Maggi, Claudia Tarantola. 2010. Bayesian outlier detection
in Capital Asset Pricing Model. Statistical Modelling 10:4, 375-390. [Crossref]
781. Yash Pal Taneja. 2010. Revisiting Fama French Three-Factor Model in Indian Stock Market. Vision:
The Journal of Business Perspective 14:4, 267-274. [Crossref]
782. Marie-Claude Beaulieu, Jean-Marie Dufour, Lynda Khalaf. 2010. Asset-pricing anomalies and
spanning: Multivariate and multifactor tests with heavy-tailed distributions. Journal of Empirical
Finance 17:4, 763-782. [Crossref]
783. Olivier Brandouy, Walter Briec, Kristiaan Kerstens, Ignace Van de Woestyne. 2010. Portfolio
performance gauging in discrete time using a Luenberger productivity indicator. Journal of Banking
& Finance 34:8, 1899-1910. [Crossref]
784. S. Paulo. 2010. The United Kingdom's Companies Act of 2006 and the capital asset pricing model.
International Journal of Law and Management 52:4, 253-264. [Crossref]
785. Chen Jianbao, Xu Yanping, Cheng Tingting. Quantile Regression Analysis of Cross-Section Returns
in Chinese Stock Market 169-172. [Crossref]
786. Christophe Schinckus. 2010. Semiotics of Financial Marketplace. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics
22:4, 317-333. [Crossref]
787. Erlend Kvaal. 2010. The Discount Rate of IAS 36 – A Comment. Accounting in Europe 7:1, 87-95.
[Crossref]
788. Shinn‐Shyr Wang, Kyle W. Stiegert, Tirtha P. Dhar. 2010. Strategic Pricing Behavior under Asset
Value Maximization. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie
58:2, 151-170. [Crossref]
789. S. Paulo. 2010. The UK Companies Act of 2006 and the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002. International
Journal of Law and Management 52:3, 173-181. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1942845
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1961660
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1976285
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2034163
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3167158
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1970109
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2010.08.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.07.005
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-120209-133954
https://doi.org/10.1177/1471082X0901000402
https://doi.org/10.1177/097226291001400403
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2010.03.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.12.015
https://doi.org/10.1108/17542431011059313
https://doi.org/10.1109/IFITA.2010.193
https://doi.org/10.1177/02601079X10002200402
https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2010.485378
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2009.01174.x
https://doi.org/10.1108/17542431011044625
790. Kurt Niquidet. 2010. Equity pricing in the forest sector: evidence from North American stock markets.
Canadian Journal of Forest Research 40:5, 943-952. [Crossref]
791. Michail Koubouros, Dimitrios Malliaropulos, Ekaterini Panopoulou. 2010. Long-run cash flow and
discount-rate risks in the cross-section of US returns. The European Journal of Finance 16:3, 227-244.
[Crossref]
792. JEFFREY A. BUSSE, AMIT GOYAL, SUNIL WAHAL. 2010. Performance and Persistence in
Institutional Investment Management. The Journal of Finance 65:2, 765-790. [Crossref]
793. Stuart Hyde, Mohamed Sherif. 2010. Tests of the conditional asset pricing model: further evidence
from the cross‐section of stock returns. International Journal of Finance & Economics 15:2, 198-211.
[Crossref]
794. . References 159-165. [Crossref]
795. S. Paulo. 2010. Hamada's equation, the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002 and the UK Companies Act of
2006. International Journal of Law and Management 52:1, 54-63. [Crossref]
796. Alain A. Vertès.
,Axes of Development in Chemical and Process Engineering for Converting Biomass
to Energy 491-521. [Crossref]
797. . Risk Equals Uncertainty 43-53. [Crossref]
798. Caroline Fohlin, Steffen Reinhold. 2010. Common stock returns in the pre-WWI Berlin Stock
Exchange. Cliometrica 4:1, 75-96. [Crossref]
799. Frank Sortino. The Big Picture 1-12. [Crossref]
800. Cherif Guermat, Mark C. Freeman. 2010. A net beta test of asset pricing models. International Review
of Financial Analysis 19:1, 1-9. [Crossref]
801. Knut Sandberg Eriksen, Svenn Jensen. 2010. The cost of second best pricing and the value of risk
premium. Research in Transportation Economics 30:1, 29-37. [Crossref]
802. Herbert Kalthoff, Uwe Vormbusch. Representing and Modelling: The Case of Portfolio Management
174-188. [Crossref]
803. Syou-Ching Lai, Hung-Chih Li, James A. Conover, Frederick Wu. O-score financial distress risk
asset pricing 51-94. [Crossref]
804. Mathijs Cosemans, Rik G. P. Frehen, Peter C. Schotman, Rob Bauer. 2010. Estimating Security Betas
Using Prior Information Based on Firm Fundamentals. SSRN Electronic Journal 95. . [Crossref]
805. Reda Jürg Messikh, Gianluca Oderda. 2010. A Proof of the Outperformance of Beta Arbitrage
Strategies. SSRN Electronic Journal 19. . [Crossref]
806. Kenneth Monroe Norton, MBA, DBA, Pan G. Yatrakis. 2010. The Effects of Cultural Differences
on Knowledge Assets and U.S. MNCS' Firms Value: A Three-Valuation Model Approach. SSRN
Electronic Journal 226. . [Crossref]
807. Matthias Thomas, Daniel Piazolo, Sebastian Michael Gläsner. 2010. Analyzing the Changing Risk and
Return Structure of German Open-Ended Funds Using Semivariance Based Performance Measures.
SSRN Electronic Journal 13. . [Crossref]
808. Zhi Da, Re J. Guo, Ravi Jagannathan. 2010. CAPM for Estimating the Cost of Equity Capital:
Interpreting the Empirical Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal 61. . [Crossref]
809. George Bragues. 2010. The Politics of Financial Markets: An Introductory Discussion. SSRN
Electronic Journal 17. . [Crossref]
810. Pierre Hereil, Philippe Mitaine, Nicolas Moussavi, Thierry Roncalli. 2010. Mutual Fund Ratings and
Performance Persistence. SSRN Electronic Journal 25. . [Crossref]
811. Haim Levy. 2010. The CAPM is Alive and Well: A Review and Synthesis. European Financial
Management 16:1, 43-71. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1139/X10-048
https://doi.org/10.1080/13518470903102419
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01550.x
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.400
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118267769.refs
https://doi.org/10.1108/17542431011018543
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470750025.ch23
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470686539.ch4
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11698-009-0037-0
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374992-5.00001-6
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2009.09.008
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2010.10.005
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230298019_9
https://doi.org/10.1108/S0196-3821(2010)0000026006
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1342326
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1534183
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1540238
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1545810
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1571299
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1618504
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1749414
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2009.00530.x
812. S. Trevis Certo, Tim R. Holcomb, R. Michael Holmes. 2009. IPO Research in Management and
Entrepreneurship: Moving the Agenda Forward. Journal of Management 35:6, 1340-1378. [Crossref]
813. Bartley J. Madden. Applying a Systems Mindset to Stock Valuation 43-66. [Crossref]
814. Christophe Schinckus. 2009. Economic uncertainty and econophysics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics
and its Applications 388:20, 4415-4423. [Crossref]
815. Claes Fornell, Sunil Mithas, Forrest V. Morgeson. 2009. Commentary —The Economic and Statistical
Significance of Stock Returns on Customer Satisfaction. Marketing Science 28:5, 820-825. [Crossref]
816. Stefan Veith, Jörg R. Werner, Jochen Zimmermann. 2009. Capital market response to emission rights
returns: Evidence from the European power sector. Energy Economics 31:4, 605-613. [Crossref]
817. Moawia Alghalith. 2009. Alternative theory of asset pricing. Journal of Asset Management 10:2, 73-74.
[Crossref]
818. Marie-Claude Beaulieu, Jean-Marie Dufour, Lynda Khalaf. 2009. Finite sample multivariate tests
of asset pricing models with coskewness. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 53:6, 2008-2021.
[Crossref]
819. Jean-Luc Besson, Michel M Dacorogna, Paolo de Martin, Michael Kastenholz, Michael Moller. 2009.
How Much Capital Does a Reinsurance Need?. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and
Practice 34:2, 159-174. [Crossref]
820. Ric Thomas, Robert Shapiro. 2009. Managed Volatility: A New Approach to Equity Investing. The
Journal of Investing 18:1, 15-23. [Crossref]
821. C. Emre Alper, Oya Pinar Ardic, Salih Fendoglu. 2009. THE ECONOMICS OF THE
UNCOVERED INTEREST PARITY CONDITION FOR EMERGING MARKETS. Journal of
Economic Surveys 23:1, 115-138. [Crossref]
822. Jørgen Vitting Andersen. Investment Decision Making in Finance, Models of 4971-4983. [Crossref]
823. Ekaterina Svetlova. Theoretical Models as Creative Resources in Financial Markets 121-135.
[Crossref]
824. Andreas Ziegler, Timo Busch, Volker H. Hoffmann. 2009. Corporate Responses to Climate Change
and Financial Performance: The Impact of Climate Policy. SSRN Electronic Journal 22. . [Crossref]
825. Haim Levy. 2009. Behavioral Economics and Asset Pricing. SSRN Electronic Journal 21. . [Crossref]
826. Markus Ampenberger, Thomas Schmid, Ann-Kristin Achleitner, Christoph Kaserer. 2009. Capital
Structure Decisions in Family Firms - Empirical Evidence from a Bank-Based Economy. SSRN
Electronic Journal 18. . [Crossref]
827. Pablo Fernandez. 2009. Betas Used by Professors: A Survey with 2,500 Answers. SSRN Electronic
Journal 24. . [Crossref]
828. Pablo Fernandez, Vicente J. Bermejo. 2009. Betas Used by Companies and Professors in Europe: A
Survey. SSRN Electronic Journal 29. . [Crossref]
829. Marius Bausys. 2009. The Performance of Minimum Variance Portfolios in the Baltic Equity Markets.
SSRN Electronic Journal 27. . [Crossref]
830. Rafał Wolski. 2009. The Influence of Negative Beta Assets on the Empirical SML in the Polish
Capital Market. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia 8:1, 140-153. [Crossref]
831. Sudipta Basu. 2008. Panel on Big Unanswered Questions in Accounting—Synopsis. Accounting
Horizons 22:4, 449-451. [Crossref]
832. Brian J. Jacobsen, Xiaochun Liu. 2008. China's segmented stock market: An application of
the conditional international capital asset pricing model. Emerging Markets Review 9:3, 153-173.
[Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309347375
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118268179.ch3
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2009.07.008
https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1090.0505
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.01.004
https://doi.org/10.1057/jam.2009.1
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2008.04.005
https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2009.8
https://doi.org/10.3905/JOI.2009.18.1.015
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2008.00558.x
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_296
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91680-4_7
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1348476
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1361699
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1364153
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1407464
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1419919
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1599709
https://doi.org/10.2478/v10031-009-0028-0
https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2008.22.4.449
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2008.06.001
833. Andy Lockett, Rory P. O'Shea, Mike Wright. 2008. The Development of the Resource-based View:
Reflections from Birger Wernerfelt 1. Organization Studies 29:8-9, 1125-1141. [Crossref]
834. Chyi Lin Lee, Jon Robinson, Richard Reed. 2008. Listed property trusts and downside systematic
risk sensitivity. Journal of Property Investment & Finance 26:4, 304-328. [Crossref]
835. Lerzan Aksoy, Bruce Cooil, Christopher Groening, Timothy L. Keiningham, Atakan Yalçın. 2008.
The Long-Term Stock Market Valuation of Customer Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing
,72:4,
105-122. [Crossref]
836. D. Sornette, V.F. Pisarenko. 2008. Properties of a simple bilinear stochastic model: Estimation and
predictability. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 237:4, 429-445. [Crossref]
837. Anusha Chari, Peter Blair Henry. 2008. Firm-specific information and the efficiency of investment.
Journal of Financial Economics 87:3, 636-655. [Crossref]
838. Fernando de Holanda Barbosa. 2008. Banco Nacional: jogo de Ponzi, PROER e FCVS. Revista de
Economia Política 28:1, 97-115. [Crossref]
839. Dimo Dimov, Gordon Murray. 2008. Determinants of the Incidence and Scale of Seed Capital
Investments by Venture Capital Firms. Small Business Economics 30:2, 127-152. [Crossref]
840. Julius Hemminki, Vesa Puttonen. 2008. Fundamental indexation in Europe. Journal of Asset
Management 8:6, 401-405. [Crossref]
841. Chyi Lee, Jon Robinson, Richard Reed. 2008. Downside Beta and the Cross-sectional Determinants
of Listed Property Trust Returns. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management 14:1, 49-62. [Crossref]
842. Herbert Kimura, Leonardo Cruz Basso, Eduardo Kazuo Kayo. 2008. The Interplay between Strategy
and Finance. SSRN Electronic Journal 29. . [Crossref]
843. Hendri Adriaens, Bas Donkers, Bertrand Melenberg. 2008. The CAPM with Endogenous Beliefs.
SSRN Electronic Journal 86. . [Crossref]
844. Vanita Tripathi. 2008. Company Fundamentals and Equity Returns in India. SSRN Electronic Journal
30. . [Crossref]
845. Bartley J. Madden. 2008. Applying a Systems Mindset to Stock Valuation. SSRN Electronic Journal
44. . [Crossref]
846. Vanita Tripathi. 2008. Company Fundamentals and Equity Returns in India. SSRN Electronic Journal
30. . [Crossref]
847. Najah Attig, Omrane Guedhami, Dev R. Mishra. 2008. Multiple Large Shareholders, Control
Contests, and Implied Cost of Equity. SSRN Electronic Journal 16. . [Crossref]
848. Peter Christoffersen, Kris Jacobs, Gregory Vainberg. 2008. Forward-Looking Betas. SSRN Electronic
Journal jou_vol[1].xmlText. . [Crossref]
849. Ron Bird, Lorenzo Casavecchia. 2007. Sentiment and Financial Health Indicators for Value and
Growth Stocks: The European Experience. The European Journal of Finance 13:8, 769-793. [Crossref]
850. Michael J. Mauboussin. 2007. The Wisdom and Whims of the Collective. CFA Institute Conference
Proceedings Quarterly 24:4, 1-8. [Crossref]
851. Peter Blair Henry. 2007. Capital Account Liberalization: Theory, Evidence, and Speculation. Journal
of Economic Literature 45:4, 887-935. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
852. Moshe Levy. 2007. Conditions for a CAPM equilibrium with positive prices. Journal of Economic
Theory 137:1, 404-415. [Crossref]
853. Gerhard Kristandl, Nick Bontis. 2007. The impact of voluntary disclosure on cost of equity capital
estimates in a temporal setting. Journal of Intellectual Capital 8:4, 577-594. [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608094773
https://doi.org/10.1108/14635780810886627
https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.4.105
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2007.08.020
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.03.008
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31572008000100005
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9008-z
https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jam.2250090
https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2008.12089797
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1089389
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1102263
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1134651
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1156524
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1247717
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1282129
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.891467
https://doi.org/10.1080/13518470701705777
https://doi.org/10.2469/cp.v24.n4.4934
https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.45.4.887
http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdf/10.1257/jel.45.4.887
http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jel.45.4.887
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2007.01.004
https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930710830765
854. Marie-Claude Beaulieu, Jean-Marie Dufour, Lynda Khalaf. 2007. Multivariate Tests of Mean–
Variance Efficiency With Possibly Non-Gaussian Errors. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 25:4,
398-410. [Crossref]
855. Sven Husmann, Andreas Stephan. 2007. On estimating an asset's implicit beta. Journal of Futures
Markets 27:10, 961-979. [Crossref]
856. Arvind Pai, David Geltner. 2007. Stocks Are from Mars, Real Estate Is from Venus. The Journal of
Portfolio Management 33:5, 134-144. [Crossref]
857. Maik Eisenbeiss, Göran Kauermann, Willi Semmler. 2007. Estimating Beta-Coefficients of German
Stock Data: A Non-Parametric Approach. The European Journal of Finance 13:6, 503-522. [Crossref]
858. Michael E. Drew, Alastair Marsden, Madhu Veeraraghavan. 2007. Does Idiosyncratic Volatility
Matter? New Zealand Evidence. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies 10:03, 289-308.
[Crossref]
859. Y. Malevergne, D. Sornette. 2007. Self-consistent asset pricing models. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics
and its Applications 382:1, 149-171. [Crossref]
860. Richard Saito, Rodrigo de Losso da Silveira Bueno. 2007. Fundamentos teóricos e empíricos de
apreçamento de ativos. Revista de Administração de Empresas 47:2, 81-85. [Crossref]
861. Robert R. Prechter, Wayne D. Parker. 2007. The Financial/Economic Dichotomy in Social Behavioral
Dynamics: The Socionomic Perspective. Journal of Behavioral Finance 8:2, 84-108. [Crossref]
862. Michail Koubouros, Ekaterini Panopoulou. 2007. Intertemporal Market Risks and the Cross–Section
of Greek Average Returns. Journal of Emerging Market Finance 6:2, 203-227. [Crossref]
863. Malcolm Baker, Jeffrey Wurgler. 2007. Investor Sentiment in the Stock Market. Journal of Economic
Perspectives 21:2, 129-151. [Abstract] [View PDF article] [PDF with links]
864. Beverly J. Hirtle, Kevin J. Stiroh. 2007. The return to retail and the performance of US banks. Journal
of Banking & Finance 31:4, 1101-1133. [Crossref]
865. Graham Bornholt. 2007. Extending the capital asset pricing model: the reward beta approach.
Accounting & Finance 47:1, 69-83. [Crossref]
866. Najet Rhaiem ., Saloua Ben Ammou ., Anouar Ben Mabrouk .. 2007. Estimation of Capital Asset
Pricing Model at Different Time Scales Application to French Stock Market. The International Journal
of Applied Economics and Finance 1:2, 79-87. [Crossref]
867. Roland Burgman, Göran Roos. 2007. The importance of intellectual capital reporting: evidence and
implications. Journal of Intellectual Capital 8:1, 7-51. [Crossref]
868. Madhusudan Karmakar. 2007. Asymmetric Volatility and Risk-return Relationship in the Indian Stock
Market. South Asia Economic Journal 8:1, 99-116. [Crossref]
869. Yu Xiao. 2007. Chinese Stock Market Systematic RiskنAn Empirical Study. SSRN Electronic Journal
1981. . [Crossref]
870. Magdalena Morgese Borys. 2007. Testing Multi-Factor Asset Pricing Models in the Visegrad
Countries. SSRN Electronic Journal 12. . [Crossref]
871. Peter Christoffersen, Kris Jacobs, Gregory Vainberg. 2007. Forward-Looking Betas. SSRN Electronic
Journal jou_vol[1].xmlText. . [Crossref]
872. Peter Blair Henry. 2007. Capital Account Liberalization: Theory, Evidence, and Speculation. SSRN
Electronic Journal 46. . [Crossref]
873. Joon Chae, Cheol Won Yang. 2007. Why an Asset Pricing Model Fails to Explain the Cross Section
of Stock Returns in the Korean Market'. SSRN Electronic Journal 77. . [Crossref]
874. Malcolm P. Baker, Jeffrey A. Wurgler. 2007. Investor Sentiment in the Stock Market. SSRN Electronic
Journal 7. . [Crossref]
https://doi.org/10.1198/073500106000000468
https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.20285
https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2007.698912
https://doi.org/10.1080/13518470701201405
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219091507001070
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2007.02.076
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902007000200007
https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560701381028
https://doi.org/10.1177/097265270700600204
https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.2.129
http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdf/10.1257/jep.21.2.129
http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.21.2.129
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.10.004
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2007.00202.x
https://doi.org/10.3923/ijaef.2007.79.87
,https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930710715051
https://doi.org/10.1177/139156140600800106
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1070805
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1114363
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1150646
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.946788
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.960185
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.962706
875. Martin Grandes. 2007. The Cost of Equity Beyond Capm: Evidence from Latin American Stocks
(1986-2004). SSRN Electronic Journal 17. . [Crossref]
876. Baibing Li, Xiangkang Yin. 2007. Information and Capital Asset Pricing. SSRN Electronic Journal
53. . [Crossref]
877. Kevin J. Stiroh. 2006. New Evidence on the Determinants of Bank Risk. Journal of Financial Services
Research 30:3, 237-263. [Crossref]
878. Christine A. Botosan. 2006. Disclosure and the cost of capital: what do we know?. Accounting and
Business Research 36:sup1, 31-40. [Crossref]
879. Holger Daske, Günther Gebhardt. 2006. Zukunftsorientierte Bestimmung von Risikoprämien
und Eigenkapitalkosten für die Unternehmensbewertung. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für
betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 58:4, 530-551. [Crossref]
880. Michelle L. Barnes, Jose A. Lopez. 2006. Alternative measures of the Federal Reserve Banks’ cost of
equity capital. Journal of Banking & Finance 30:6, 1687-1711. [Crossref]
881. Holger Daske. 2006. Economic Benefits of Adopting IFRS or US-GAAP - Have the Expected Cost
of Equity Capital Really Decreased?. Journal of Business Finance > Accounting, ahead of print060428035417008. [Crossref] 882. Holger Daske. 2006. Economic Benefits of Adopting IFRS or US-GAAP - Have the Expected Cost of Equity Capital Really Decreased?. Journal of Business Finance > Accounting 33:3-4, 329-373. [Crossref] 883. Holger Daske, Günther Gebhardt, Stefan Klein. 2006. Estimating the Expected Cost of Equity Capital Using Analysts’ Consensus Forecasts. Schmalenbach Business Review 58:1, 2-36. [Crossref] 884. Graham N. Bornholt. 2006. Extending the CAPM: The Reward Beta Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal 5. . [Crossref] 885. Graham N. Bornholt. 2006. Expected Utility and Mean-Risk Asset Pricing Models. SSRN Electronic Journal 5. . [Crossref] 886. Peter L. Bernstein. 2005. Capital Ideas: From the Past to the Future. Financial Analysts Journal 61:6, 55-59. [Crossref] 887. Sudipta Basu. 2005. Discussion—The Effect of Risk on Price Responses to Unexpected Earnings. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 20:4, 483-494. [Crossref] 888. Ho-Chuan (River) Huang *, Pei-Shan Wu. 2005. Tests of the CAPM with structural instability and asymmetry. Applied Financial Economics Letters 1:5, 321-327. [Crossref] 889. Michelle L. Barnes, Jose A. Lopez. 2005. Alternative Measures of the Federal Reserve Banks' Cost of Equity Capital. SSRN Electronic Journal 39. . [Crossref] 890. Michelle L. Barnes, Jose A. Lopez. 2005. Alternative Measures of the Federal Reserve Banks' Cost of Equity Capital. SSRN Electronic Journal 76. . [Crossref] 891. Vijay Gondhalekar, C.R. Narayanaswamy, Sridhar Sundaram. The Long-Term Risk Effects of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) on the Financial Services Industry 361-377. [Crossref] https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.967444 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.988623 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-006-0418-5 https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2006.9730042 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03371666 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.09.005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00008.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00611.x https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396722 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.907402 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.921323 https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v61.n6.2771 https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0502000409 https://doi.org/10.1080/17446540500226171 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.725909 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.887943 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1569-3732(07)12014-4 The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence The Logic of the CAPM Early Empirical Tests Tests on Risk Premiums Testing Whether Market Betas Explain Expected Returns Recent Tests Explanations: Irrational Pricing or Risk The Market Proxy Problem Conclusions References Perspectives returns on beta. If all differences in expected return are explained by beta, the average slopes on the additional variables should not be reliably different from zero. Clearly, the trick in the cross-section regression approach is to choose specific additional variables likely to expose any problems of the CAPM prediction that, because the market portfolio is efficient, market betas suffice to explain expected asset returns. For example, in Fama and MacBeth (1973) the additional variables are squared market betas (to test the prediction that the relation between expected return and beta is linear) and residual variances from regressions of returns on the market return (to test the prediction that market beta is the only measure of risk needed to explain expected returns). These variables do not add to the explanation of average returns provided by beta. Thus, the results of Fama and MacBeth (1973) are consistent with the hypothesis that their market proxy—an equal-weight port- folio of NYSE stocks—is on the minimum variance frontier. The hypothesis that market betas completely explain expected returns can also be tested using time-series regressions. In the time-series regression described above (the excess return on asset i regressed on the excess market return), the intercept is the difference between the asset’s average excess return and the excess return predicted by the Sharpe-Lintner model, that is, beta times the average excess market return. If the model holds, there is no way to group assets into portfolios whose intercepts are reliably different from zero. For example, the intercepts for a portfolio of stocks with high ratios of earnings to price and a portfolio of stocks with low earning-price ratios should both be zero. Thus, to test the hypothesis that market betas suffice to explain expected returns, one estimates the time-series regression for a set of assets (or portfolios) and then jointly tests the vector of regression intercepts against zero. The trick in this approach is to choose the left-hand-side assets (or portfolios) in a way likely to expose any shortcoming of the CAPM prediction that market betas suffice to explain expected asset returns. In early applications, researchers use a variety of tests to determine whether the intercepts in a set of time-series regressions are all zero. The tests have the same asymptotic properties, but there is controversy about which has the best small sample properties. Gibbons, Ross and Shanken (1989) settle the debate by provid- ing an F-test on the intercepts that has exact small-sample properties. They also show that the test has a simple economic interpretation. In effect, the test con- structs a candidate for the tangency portfolio T in Figure 1 by optimally combining the market proxy and the left-hand-side assets of the time-series regressions. The estimator then tests whether the efficient set provided by the combination of this tangency portfolio and the risk-free asset is reliably superior to the one obtained by combining the risk-free asset with the market proxy alone. In other words, the Gibbons, Ross and Shanken statistic tests whether the market proxy is the tangency portfolio in the set of portfolios that can be constructed by combining the market portfolio with the specific assets used as dependent variables in the time-series regressions. Enlightened by this insight of Gibbons, Ross and Shanken (1989), one can see Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French 35 a similar interpretation of the cross-section regression test of whether market betas suffice to explain expected returns. In this case, the test is whether the additional explanatory variables in a cross-section regression identify patterns in the returns on the left-hand-side assets that are not explained by the assets’ market betas. This amounts to testing whether the market proxy is on the minimum variance frontier that can be constructed using the market proxy and the left-hand-side assets included in the tests. An important lesson from this discussion is that time-series and cross-section regressions do not, strictly speaking, test the CAPM. What is literally tested is whether a specific proxy for the market portfolio (typically a portfolio of U.S. common stocks) is efficient in the set of portfolios that can be constructed from it and the left-hand-side assets used in the test. One might conclude from this that the CAPM has never been tested, and prospects for testing it are not good because 1) the set of left-hand-side assets does not include all marketable assets, and 2) data for the true market portfolio of all assets are likely beyond reach (Roll, 1977; more on this later). But this criticism can be leveled at tests of any economic model when the tests are less than exhaustive or when they use proxies for the variables called for by the model. The bottom line from the early cross-section regression tests of the CAPM, such as Fama and MacBeth (1973), and the early time-series regression tests, like Gibbons (1982) and Stambaugh (1982), is that standard market proxies seem to be on the minimum variance frontier. That is, the central predictions of the Black version of the CAPM, that market betas suffice to explain expected returns and that the risk premium for beta is positive, seem to hold. But the more specific prediction of the Sharpe-Lintner CAPM that the premium per unit of beta is the expected market return minus the risk-free interest rate is consistently rejected. The success of the Black version of the CAPM in early tests produced a consensus that the model is a good description of expected returns. These early results, coupled with the model’s simplicity and intuitive appeal, pushed the CAPM to the forefront of finance. Recent Tests Starting in the late 1970s, empirical work appears that challenges even the Black version of the CAPM. Specifically, evidence mounts that much of the varia- tion in expected return is unrelated to market beta. The first blow is Basu’s (1977) evidence that when common stocks are sorted on earnings-price ratios, future returns on high E/P stocks are higher than pre- dicted by the CAPM. Banz (1981) documents a size effect: when stocks are sorted on market capitalization (price times shares outstanding), average returns on small stocks are higher than predicted by the CAPM. Bhandari (1988) finds that high debt-equity ratios (book value of debt over the market value of equity, a measure of leverage) are associated with returns that are too high relative to their market betas. 36 Journal of Economic Perspectives Finally, Statman (1980) and Rosenberg, Reid and Lanstein (1985) document that stocks with high book-to-market equity ratios (B/M, the ratio of the book value of a common stock to its market value) have high average returns that are not captured by their betas. There is a theme in the contradictions of the CAPM summarized above. Ratios involving stock prices have information about expected returns missed by market betas. On reflection, this is not surprising. A stock’s price depends not only on the expected cash flows it will provide, but also on the expected returns that discount expected cash flows back to the present. Thus, in principle, the cross-section of prices has information about the cross-section of expected returns. (A high ex- pected return implies a high discount rate and a low price.) The cross-section of stock prices is, however, arbitrarily affected by differences in scale (or units). But with a judicious choice of scaling variable X, the ratio X/P can reveal differences in the cross-section of expected stock returns. Such ratios are thus prime candidates to expose shortcomings of asset pricing models—in the case of the CAPM, short- comings of the prediction that market betas suffice to explain expected returns (Ball, 1978). The contradictions of the CAPM summarized above suggest that earnings-price, debt-equity and book-to-market ratios indeed play this role. Fama and French (1992) update and synthesize the evidence on the empirical failures of the CAPM. Using the cross-section regression approach, they confirm that size, earnings-price, debt-equity and book-to-market ratios add to the explana- tion of expected stock returns provided by market beta. Fama and French (1996) reach the same conclusion using the time-series regression approach applied to portfolios of stocks sorted on price ratios. They also find that different price ratios have much the same information about expected returns. This is not surprising given that price is the common driving force in the price ratios, and the numerators are just scaling variables used to extract the information in price about expected returns. Fama and French (1992) also confirm the evidence (Reinganum, 1981; Stam- baugh, 1982; Lakonishok and Shapiro, 1986) that the relation between average return and beta for common stocks is even flatter after the sample periods used in the early empirical work on the CAPM. The estimate of the beta premium is, however, clouded by statistical uncertainty (a large standard error). Kothari, Shan- ken and Sloan (1995) try to resuscitate the Sharpe-Lintner CAPM by arguing that the weak relation between average return and beta is just a chance result. But the strong evidence that other variables capture variation in expected return missed by beta makes this argument irrelevant. If betas do not suffice to explain expected returns, the market portfolio is not efficient, and the CAPM is dead in its tracks. Evidence on the size of the market premium can neither save the model nor further doom it. The synthesis of the evidence on the empirical problems of the CAPM pro- vided by Fama and French (1992) serves as a catalyst, marking the point when it is generally acknowledged that the CAPM has potentially fatal problems. Research then turns to explanations. The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence 37 One possibility is that the CAPM’s problems are spurious, the result of data dredging—publication-hungry researchers scouring the data and unearthing con- tradictions that occur in specific samples as a result of chance. A standard response to this concern is to test for similar findings in other samples. Chan, Hamao and Lakonishok (1991) find a strong relation between book-to-market equity (B/M) and average return for Japanese stocks. Capaul, Rowley and Sharpe (1993) observe a similar B/M effect in four European stock markets and in Japan. Fama and French (1998) find that the price ratios that produce problems for the CAPM in U.S. data show up in the same way in the stock returns of twelve non-U.S. major markets, and they are present in emerging market returns. This evidence suggests that the contradictions of the CAPM associated with price ratios are not sample specific. Explanations: Irrational Pricing or Risk Among those who conclude that the empirical failures of the CAPM are fatal, two stories emerge. On one side are the behavioralists. Their view is based on evidence that stocks with high ratios of book value to market price are typically firms that have fallen on bad times, while low B/M is associated with growth firms (Lakonishok, Shleifer and Vishny, 1994; Fama and French, 1995). The behavior- alists argue that sorting firms on book-to-market ratios exposes investor overreac- tion to good and bad times. Investors overextrapolate past performance, resulting in stock prices that are too high for growth (low B/M) firms and too low for distressed (high B/M, so-called value) firms. When the overreaction is eventually corrected, the result is high returns for value stocks and low returns for growth stocks. Proponents of this view include DeBondt and Thaler (1987), Lakonishok, Shleifer and Vishny (1994) and Haugen (1995). The second story for explaining the empirical contradictions of the CAPM is that they point to the need for a more complicated asset pricing model. The CAPM is based on many unrealistic assumptions. For example, the assumption that investors care only about the mean and variance of one-period portfolio returns is extreme. It is reasonable that investors also care about how their portfolio return covaries with labor income and future investment opportunities, so a portfolio’s return variance misses important dimensions of risk. If so, market beta is not a complete description of an asset’s risk, and we should not be surprised to find that differences in expected return are not completely explained by differences in beta. In this view, the search should turn to asset pricing models that do a better job explaining average returns. Merton’s (1973) intertemporal capital asset pricing model (ICAPM) is a natural extension of the CAPM. The ICAPM begins with a different assumption about investor objectives. In the CAPM, investors care only about the wealth their portfolio produces at the end of the current period. In the ICAPM, investors are concerned not only with their end-of-period payoff, but also with the opportunities 38 Journal of Economic Perspectives they will have to consume or invest the payoff. Thus, when choosing a portfolio at time t � 1, ICAPM investors consider how their wealth at t might vary with future state variables, including labor income, the prices of consumption goods and the nature of portfolio opportunities at t, and expectations about the labor income, consumption and investment opportunities to be available after t. Like CAPM investors, ICAPM investors prefer high expected return and low return variance. But ICAPM investors are also concerned with the covariances of portfolio returns with state variables. As a result, optimal portfolios are “multifactor efficient,” which means they have the largest possible expected returns, given their return variances and the covariances of their returns with the relevant state variables. Fama (1996) shows that the ICAPM generalizes the logic of the CAPM. That is, if there is risk-free borrowing and lending or if short sales of risky assets are allowed, market clearing prices imply that the market portfolio is multifactor efficient. Moreover, multifactor efficiency implies a relation between expected return and beta risks, but it requires additional betas, along with a market beta, to explain expected returns. An ideal implementation of the ICAPM would specify the state variables that affect expected returns. Fama and French (1993) take a more indirect approach, perhaps more in the spirit of Ross’s (1976) arbitrage pricing theory. They argue that though size and book-to-market equity are not themselves state variables, the higher average returns on small stocks and high book-to-market stocks reflect unidentified state variables that produce undiversifiable risks (covariances) in returns that are not captured by the market return and are priced separately from market betas. In support of this claim, they show that the returns on the stocks of small firms covary more with one another than with returns on the stocks of large firms, and returns on high book-to-market (value) stocks covary more with one another than with returns on low book-to-market (growth) stocks. Fama and French (1995) show that there are similar size and book-to-market patterns in the covariation of fundamentals like earnings and sales. Based on this evidence, Fama and French (1993, 1996) propose a three-factor model for expected returns, �Three-Factor Model� E�Rit � � Rft � �iM �E�RMt � � Rft � � �isE�SMBt� � �ihE�HMLt�. In this equation, SMBt (small minus big) is the difference between the returns on diversified portfolios of small and big stocks, HMLt (high minus low) is the difference between the returns on diversified portfolios of high and low B/M stocks, and the betas are slopes in the multiple regression of Rit � Rft on RMt � Rft, SMBt and HMLt. For perspective, the average value of the market premium RMt � Rft for 1927–2003 is 8.3 percent per year, which is 3.5 standard errors from zero. The Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French 39 average values of SMBt, and HMLt are 3.6 percent and 5.0 percent per year, and they are 2.1 and 3.1 standard errors from zero. All three premiums are volatile, with annual standard deviations of 21.0 percent (RMt � Rft), 14.6 percent (SMBt) and 14.2 percent (HMLt) per year. Although the average values of the premiums are large, high volatility implies substantial uncertainty about the true expected premiums. One implication of the expected return equation of the three-factor model is that the intercept �i in the time-series regression, Rit � Rft � �i � �iM�RMt � Rft� � �isSMBt � �ihHMLt � �it , is zero for all assets i. Using this criterion, Fama and French (1993, 1996) find that the model captures much of the variation in average return for portfolios formed on size, book-to-market equity and other price ratios that cause problems for the CAPM. Fama and French (1998) show that an international version of the model performs better than an international CAPM in describing average returns on portfolios formed on scaled price variables for stocks in 13 major markets. The three-factor model is now widely used in empirical research that requires a model of expected returns. Estimates of �i from the time-series regression above are used to calibrate how rapidly stock prices respond to new information (for example, Loughran and Ritter, 1995; Mitchell and Stafford, 2000). They are also used to measure the special information of portfolio managers, for example, in Carhart’s (1997) study of mutual fund performance. Among practitioners like Ibbotson Associates, the model is offered as an alternative to the CAPM for estimating the cost of equity capital. From a theoretical perspective, the main shortcoming of the three-factor model is its empirical motivation. The small-minus-big (SMB) and high-minus-low (HML) explanatory returns are not motivated by predictions about state variables of concern to investors. Instead they are brute force constructs meant to capture the patterns uncovered by previous work on how average stock returns vary with size and the book-to-market equity ratio. But this concern is not fatal. The ICAPM does not require that the additional portfolios used along with the market portfolio to explain expected returns “mimic” the relevant state variables. In both the ICAPM and the arbitrage pricing theory, it suffices that the additional portfolios are well diversified (in the termi- nology of Fama, 1996, they are multifactor minimum variance) and that they are sufficiently different from the market portfolio to capture covariation in returns and variation in expected returns missed by the market portfolio. Thus, adding diversified portfolios that capture covariation in returns and variation in average returns left unexplained by the market is in the spirit of both the ICAPM and the Ross’s arbitrage pricing theory. The behavioralists are not impressed by the evidence for a risk-based expla- nation of the failures of the CAPM. They typically concede that the three-factor model captures covariation in returns missed by the market return and that it picks 40 Journal of Economic Perspectives up much of the size and value effects in average returns left unexplained by the CAPM. But their view is that the average return premium associated with the model’s book-to-market factor—which does the heavy lifting in the improvements to the CAPM—is itself the result of investor overreaction that happens to be correlated across firms in a way that just looks like a risk story. In short, in the behavioral view, the market tries to set CAPM prices, and violations of the CAPM are due to mispricing. The conflict between the behavioral irrational pricing story and the rational risk story for the empirical failures of the CAPM leaves us at a timeworn impasse. Fama (1970) emphasizes that the hypothesis that prices properly reflect available information must be tested in the context of a model of expected returns, like the CAPM. Intuitively, to test whether prices are rational, one must take a stand on what the market is trying to do in setting prices—that is, what is risk and what is the relation between expected return and risk? When tests reject the CAPM, one cannot say whether the problem is its assumption that prices are rational (the behavioral view) or violations of other assumptions that are also necessary to produce the CAPM (our position). Fortunately, for some applications, the way one uses the three-factor model does not depend on one’s view about whether its average return premiums are the rational result of underlying state variable risks, the result of irrational investor behavior or sample specific results of chance. For example, when measuring the response of stock prices to new information or when evaluating the performance of managed portfolios, one wants to account for known patterns in returns and average returns for the period examined, whatever their source. Similarly, when estimating the cost of equity capital, one might be unconcerned with whether expected return premiums are rational or irrational since they are in either case part of the opportunity cost of equity capital (Stein, 1996). But the cost of capital is forward looking, so if the premiums are sample specific they are irrelevant. The three-factor model is hardly a panacea. Its most serious problem is the momentum effect of Jegadeesh and Titman (1993). Stocks that do well relative to the market over the last three to twelve months tend to continue to do well for the next few months, and stocks that do poorly continue to do poorly. This momentum effect is distinct from the value effect captured by book-to-market equity and other price ratios. Moreover, the momentum effect is left unexplained by the three-factor model, as well as by the CAPM. Following Carhart (1997), one response is to add a momentum factor (the difference between the returns on diversified portfolios of short-term winners and losers) to the three-factor model. This step is again legiti- mate in applications where the goal is to abstract from known patterns in average returns to uncover information-specific or manager-specific effects. But since the momentum effect is short-lived, it is largely irrelevant for estimates of the cost of equity capital. Another strand of research points to problems in both the three-factor model and the CAPM. Frankel and Lee (1998), Dechow, Hutton and Sloan (1999), Piotroski (2000) and others show that in portfolios formed on price ratios like The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence 41 book-to-market equity, stocks with higher expected cash flows have higher average returns that are not captured by the three-factor model or the CAPM. The authors interpret their results as evidence that stock prices are irrational, in the sense that they do not reflect available information about expected profitability. In truth, however, one can’t tell whether the problem is bad pricing or a bad asset pricing model. A stock’s price can always be expressed as the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the expected return on the stock (Camp- bell and Shiller, 1989; Vuolteenaho, 2002). It follows that if two stocks have the same price, the one with higher expected cash flows must have a higher expected return. This holds true whether pricing is rational or irrational. Thus, when one observes a positive relation between expected cash flows and expected returns that is left unexplained by the CAPM or the three-factor model, one can’t tell whether it is the result of irrational pricing or a misspecified asset pricing model. The Market Proxy Problem Roll (1977) argues that the CAPM has never been tested and probably never will be. The problem is that the market portfolio at the heart of the model is theoretically and empirically elusive. It is not theoretically clear which assets (for example, human capital) can legitimately be excluded from the market portfolio, and data availability substantially limits the assets that are included. As a result, tests of the CAPM are forced to use proxies for the market portfolio, in effect testing whether the proxies are on the minimum variance frontier. Roll argues that because the tests use proxies, not the true market portfolio, we learn nothing about the CAPM. We are more pragmatic. The relation between expected return and market beta of the CAPM is just the minimum variance condition that holds in any efficient portfolio, applied to the market portfolio. Thus, if we can find a market proxy that is on the minimum variance frontier, it can be used to describe differences in expected returns, and we would be happy to use it for this purpose. The strong rejections of the CAPM described above, however, say that researchers have not uncovered a reasonable market proxy that is close to the minimum variance frontier. If researchers are constrained to reasonable proxies, we doubt they ever will. Our pessimism is fueled by several empirical results. Stambaugh (1982) tests the CAPM using a range of market portfolios that include, in addition to U.S. common stocks, corporate and government bonds, preferred stocks, real estate and other consumer durables. He finds that tests of the CAPM are not sensitive to expanding the market proxy beyond common stocks, basically because the volatility of expanded market returns is dominated by the volatility of stock returns. One need not be convinced by Stambaugh’s (1982) results since his market proxies are limited to U.S. assets. If international capital markets are open and asset prices conform to an international version of the CAPM, the market portfolio 42 Journal of Economic Perspectives should include international assets. Fama and French (1998) find, however, that betas for a global stock market portfolio cannot explain the high average returns observed around the world on stocks with high book-to-market or high earnings- price ratios. A major problem for the CAPM is that portfolios formed by sorting stocks on price ratios produce a wide range of average returns, but the average returns are not positively related to market betas (Lakonishok, Shleifer and Vishny, 1994; Fama and French, 1996, 1998). The problem is illustrated in Figure 3, which shows average returns and betas (calculated with respect to the CRSP value-weight port- folio of NYSE, AMEX and NASDAQ stocks) for July 1963 to December 2003 for ten portfolios of U.S. stocks formed annually on sorted values of the book-to-market equity ratio (B/M).6 Average returns on the B/M portfolios increase almost monotonically, from 10.1 percent per year for the lowest B/M group (portfolio 1) to an impressive 16.7 percent for the highest (portfolio 10). But the positive relation between beta and average return predicted by the CAPM is notably absent. For example, the portfolio with the lowest book-to-market ratio has the highest beta but the lowest average return. The estimated beta for the portfolio with the highest book-to- market ratio and the highest average return is only 0.98. With an average annual- ized value of the riskfree interest rate, Rf , of 5.8 percent and an average annualized market premium, RM � Rf , of 11.3 percent, the Sharpe-Lintner CAPM predicts an average return of 11.8 percent for the lowest B/M portfolio and 11.2 percent for the highest, far from the observed values, 10.1 and 16.7 percent. For the Sharpe- Lintner model to “work” on these portfolios, their market betas must change dramatically, from 1.09 to 0.78 for the lowest B/M portfolio and from 0.98 to 1.98 for the highest. We judge it unlikely that alternative proxies for the market portfolio will produce betas and a market premium that can explain the average returns on these portfolios. It is always possible that researchers will redeem the CAPM by finding a reasonable proxy for the market portfolio that is on the minimum variance frontier. We emphasize, however, that this possibility cannot be used to justify the way the CAPM is currently applied. The problem is that applications typically use the same 6 Stock return data are from CRSP, and book equity data are from Compustat and the Moody’s Industrials, Transportation, Utilities and Financials manuals. Stocks are allocated to ten portfolios at the end of June of each year t (1963 to 2003) using the ratio of book equity for the fiscal year ending in calendar year t � 1, divided by market equity at the end of December of t � 1. Book equity is the book value of stockholders’ equity, plus balance sheet deferred taxes and investment tax credit (if available), minus the book value of preferred stock. Depending on availability, we use the redemption, liquidation or par value (in that order) to estimate the book value of preferred stock. Stockholders’ equity is the value reported by Moody’s or Compustat, if it is available. If not, we measure stockholders’ equity as the book value of common equity plus the par value of preferred stock or the book value of assets minus total liabilities (in that order). The portfolios for year t include NYSE (1963–2003), AMEX (1963–2003) and NASDAQ (1972–2003) stocks with positive book equity in t � 1 and market equity (from CRSP) for December of t � 1 and June of t. The portfolios exclude securities CRSP does not classify as ordinary common equity. The breakpoints for year t use only securities that are on the NYSE in June of year t. Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French 43 market proxies, like the value-weight portfolio of U.S. stocks, that lead to rejections of the model in empirical tests. The contradictions of the CAPM observed when such proxies are used in tests of the model show up as bad estimates of expected returns in applications; for example, estimates of the cost of equity capital that are too low (relative to historical average returns) for small stocks and for stocks with high book-to-market equity ratios. In short, if a market proxy does not work in tests of the CAPM, it does not work in applications. Conclusions The version of the CAPM developed by Sharpe (1964) and Lintner (1965) has never been an empirical success. In the early empirical work, the Black (1972) version of the model, which can accommodate a flatter tradeoff of average return for market beta, has some success. But in the late 1970s, research begins to uncover variables like size, various price ratios and momentum that add to the explanation of average returns provided by beta. The problems are serious enough to invalidate most applications of the CAPM. For example, finance textbooks often recommend using the Sharpe-Lintner CAPM risk-return relation to estimate the cost of equity capital. The prescription is to estimate a stock’s market beta and combine it with the risk-free interest rate and the average market risk premium to produce an estimate of the cost of equity. The typical market portfolio in these exercises includes just U.S. common stocks. But empirical work, old and new, tells us that the relation between beta and average return is flatter than predicted by the Sharpe-Lintner version of the CAPM. As a Figure 3 Average Annualized Monthly Return versus Beta for Value Weight Portfolios Formed on B/M, 1963–2003 Average returns predicted by the CAPM 0.7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 0.8 10 (highest B/M) 9 6 3 2 1 (lowest B/M) 5 4 7 8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 A ve ra ge a n n ua liz ed m on th ly r et ur n ( % ) 44 Journal of Economic Perspectives result, CAPM estimates of the cost of equity for high beta stocks are too high (relative to historical average returns) and estimates for low beta stocks are too low (Friend and Blume, 1970). Similarly, if the high average returns on value stocks (with high book-to-market ratios) imply high expected returns, CAPM cost of equity estimates for such stocks are too low.7 The CAPM is also often used to measure the performance of mutual funds and other managed portfolios. The approach, dating to Jensen (1968), is to estimate the CAPM time-series regression for a portfolio and use the intercept (Jensen’s alpha) to measure abnormal performance. The problem is that, because of the empirical failings of the CAPM, even passively managed stock portfolios produce abnormal returns if their investment strategies involve tilts toward CAPM problems (Elton, Gruber, Das and Hlavka, 1993). For example, funds that concentrate on low beta stocks, small stocks or value stocks will tend to produce positive abnormal returns relative to the predictions of the Sharpe-Lintner CAPM, even when the fund managers have no special talent for picking winners. The CAPM, like Markowitz’s (1952, 1959) portfolio model on which it is built, is nevertheless a theoretical tour de force. We continue to teach the CAPM as an introduction to the fundamental concepts of portfolio theory and asset pricing, to be built on by more complicated models like Merton’s (1973) ICAPM. But we also warn students that despite its seductive simplicity, the CAPM’s empirical problems probably invalidate its use in applications. y We gratefully acknowledge the comments of John Cochrane, George Constantinides, Richard Leftwich, Andrei Shleifer, René Stulz and Timothy Taylor. 7 The problems are compounded by the large standard errors of estimates of the market premium and of betas for individual stocks, which probably suffice to make CAPM estimates of the cost of equity rather meaningless, even if the CAPM holds (Fama and French, 1997; Pastor and Stambaugh, 1999). For example, using the U.S. Treasury bill rate as the risk-free interest rate and the CRSP value-weight portfolio of publicly traded U.S. common stocks, the average value of the equity premium RMt � Rft for 1927–2003 is 8.3 percent per year, with a standard error of 2.4 percent. The two standard error range thus runs from 3.5 percent to 13.1 percent, which is sufficient to make most projects appear either profitable or unprofitable. This problem is, however, hardly special to the CAPM. For example, expected returns in all versions of Merton’s (1973) ICAPM include a market beta and the expected market premium. Also, as noted earlier the expected values of the size and book-to-market premiums in the Fama-French three-factor model are also estimated with substantial error. The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence 45 References Ball, Ray. 1978. “Anomalies in Relationships Between Securities’ Yields and Yield-Surrogates.” Journal of Financial Economics. 6:2, pp. 103–26. Banz, Rolf W. 1981. “The Relationship Be- tween Return and Market Value of Common Stocks.” Journal of Financial Economics. 9:1, pp. 3–18. Basu, Sanjay. 1977. “Investment Performance of Common Stocks in Relation to Their Price- Earnings Ratios: A Test of the Efficient Market Hypothesis.” Journal of Finance. 12:3, pp. 129–56. Bhandari, Laxmi Chand. 1988. “Debt/Equity Ratio and Expected Common Stock Returns: Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Finance. 43:2, pp. 507–28. Black, Fischer. 1972. “Capital Market Equilib- rium with Restricted Borrowing.” Journal of Busi- ness. 45:3, pp. 444–54. Black, Fischer, Michael C. Jensen and Myron Scholes. 1972. “The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests,” in Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets. Michael C. Jensen, ed. New York: Praeger, pp. 79–121. Blume, Marshall. 1970. “Portfolio Theory: A Step Towards its Practical Application.” Journal of Business. 43:2, pp. 152–74. Blume, Marshall and Irwin Friend. 1973. “A New Look at the Capital Asset Pricing Model.” Journal of Finance. 28:1, pp. 19–33. Campbell, John Y. and Robert J. Shiller. 1989. “The Dividend-Price Ratio and Expectations of Future Dividends and Discount Factors.” Review of Financial Studies. 1:3, pp. 195–228. Capaul, Carlo, Ian Rowley and William F. Sharpe. 1993. “International Value and Growth Stock Returns.” Financial Analysts Journal. January/February, 49, pp. 27–36. Carhart, Mark M. 1997. “On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance.” Journal of Finance. 52:1, pp. 57–82. Chan, Louis K.C., Yasushi Hamao and Josef Lakonishok. 1991. “Fundamentals and Stock Re- turns in Japan.” Journal of Finance. 46:5, pp. 1739–789. DeBondt, Werner F. M. and Richard H. Tha- ler. 1987. “Further Evidence on Investor Over- reaction and Stock Market Seasonality.” Journal of Finance. 42:3, pp. 557–81. Dechow, Patricia M., Amy P. Hutton and Rich- ard G. Sloan. 1999. “An Empirical Assessment of the Residual Income Valuation Model.” Journal of Accounting and Economics. 26:1, pp. 1–34. Douglas, George W. 1968. Risk in the Equity Markets: An Empirical Appraisal of Market Efficiency. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms, Inc. Elton, Edwin J., Martin J. Gruber, Sanjiv Das and Matt Hlavka. 1993. “Efficiency with Costly Information: A Reinterpretation of Evidence from Managed Portfolios.” Review of Financial Studies. 6:1, pp. 1–22. Fama, Eugene F. 1970. “Efficient Capital Mar- kets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work.” Journal of Finance. 25:2, pp. 383–417. Fama, Eugene F. 1996. “Multifactor Portfolio Efficiency and Multifactor Asset Pricing.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 31:4, pp. 441–65. Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French. 1992. “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Re- turns.” Journal of Finance. 47:2, pp. 427–65. Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French. 1993. “Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics. 33:1, pp. 3–56. Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French. 1995. “Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earn- ings and Returns.” Journal of Finance. 50:1, pp. 131–55. Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French. 1996. “Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies.” Journal of Finance. 51:1, pp. 55–84. Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French. 1997. “Industry Costs of Equity.” Journal of Finan- cial Economics. 43:2 pp. 153–93. Fama, Eugene F. and Kenneth R. French. 1998. “Value Versus Growth: The International Evidence.” Journal of Finance. 53:6, pp. 1975–999. Fama, Eugene F. and James D. MacBeth. 1973. “Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests.” Journal of Political Economy. 81:3, pp. 607–36. Frankel, Richard and Charles M.C. Lee. 1998. “Accounting Valuation, Market Expectation, and Cross-Sectional Stock Returns.” Journal of Accounting and Economics. 25:3 pp. 283–319. Friend, Irwin and Marshall Blume. 1970. “Measurement of Portfolio Performance under Uncertainty.” American Economic Review. 60:4, pp. 607–36. Gibbons, Michael R. 1982. “Multivariate Tests of Financial Models: A New Approach.” Journal of Financial Economics. 10:1, pp. 3–27. Gibbons, Michael R., Stephen A. Ross and Jay Shanken. 1989. “A Test of the Efficiency of a Given Portfolio.” Econometrica. 57:5, pp. 1121– 152. Haugen, Robert. 1995. The New Finance: The http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1111%2Fj.1540-6261.1988.tb03952.x&citationId=p_4 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1111%2Fj.1540-6261.1987.tb04569.x&citationId=p_13 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1016%2F0304-405X%2893%2990023-5&citationId=p_22 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1016%2FS0165-4101%2898%2900049-4&citationId=p_14 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1086%2F295472&citationId=p_5 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1111%2F0022-1082.00080&citationId=p_30 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1086%2F260061&citationId=p_31 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1086%2F295262&citationId=p_7 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1016%2FS0165-4101%2898%2900026-3&citationId=p_32 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1111%2Fj.1540-6261.1995.tb05169.x&citationId=p_24 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1093%2Frfs%2F6.1.1&citationId=p_16 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1111%2Fj.1540-6261.1973.tb01342.x&citationId=p_8 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.2307%2F2325486&citationId=p_17 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.2469%2Ffaj.v49.n1.27&citationId=p_10 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1016%2F0304-405X%2878%2990026-0&citationId=p_1 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.2307%2F2329302&citationId=p_26 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.2307%2F2331355&citationId=p_18 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1093%2Frfs%2F1.3.195&citationId=p_9 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1016%2F0304-405X%2882%2990028-9&citationId=p_34 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1111%2Fj.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x&citationId=p_11 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1016%2F0304-405X%2881%2990018-0&citationId=p_2 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.2307%2F1913625&citationId=p_35 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.2307%2F2329112&citationId=p_20 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1111%2Fj.1540-6261.1991.tb04642.x&citationId=p_12 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1016%2FS0304-405X%2896%2900896-3&citationId=p_28 46 Journal of Economic Perspectives Case against Efficient Markets. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall. Jegadeesh, Narasimhan and Sheridan Titman. 1993. “Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Effi- ciency.” Journal of Finance. 48:1, pp. 65–91. Jensen, Michael C. 1968. “The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945–1964.” Journal of Finance. 23:2, pp. 389–416. Kothari, S. P., Jay Shanken and Richard G. Sloan. 1995. “Another Look at the Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance. 50:1, pp. 185–224. Lakonishok, Josef and Alan C. Shapiro. 1986. Systemaitc Risk, Total Risk, and Size as Determi- nants of Stock Market Returns.“ Journal of Bank- ing and Finance. 10:1, pp. 115–32. Lakonishok, Josef, Andrei Shleifer and Rob- ert W. Vishny. 1994. “Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and Risk.” Journal of Finance. 49:5, pp. 1541–578. Lintner, John. 1965. “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets.” Review of Economics and Statistics. 47:1, pp. 13–37. Loughran, Tim and Jay. R. Ritter. 1995. “The New Issues Puzzle.” Journal of Finance. 50:1, pp. 23–51. Markowitz, Harry. 1952. “Portfolio Selection.” Journal of Finance. 7:1, pp. 77–99. Markowitz, Harry. 1959. Portfolio Selection: Effi- cient Diversification of Investments. Cowles Founda- tion Monograph No. 16. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Merton, Robert C. 1973. “An Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model.” Econometrica. 41:5, pp. 867–87. Miller, Merton and Myron Scholes. 1972. “Rates of Return in Relation to Risk: A Reexam- ination of Some Recent Findings,” in Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets. Michael C. Jensen, ed. New York: Praeger, pp. 47–78. Mitchell, Mark L. and Erik Stafford. 2000. “Managerial Decisions and Long-Term Stock Price Performance.” Journal of Business. 73:3, pp. 287–329. Pastor, Lubos and Robert F. Stambaugh. 1999. “Costs of Equity Capital and Model Mis- pricing.” Journal of Finance. 54:1, pp. 67–121. Piotroski, Joseph D. 2000. “Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Infor- mation to Separate Winners from Losers.” Jour- nal of Accounting Research. 38:Supplement, pp. 1–51. Reinganum, Marc R. 1981. “A New Empirical Perspective on the CAPM.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 16:4, pp. 439–62. Roll, Richard. 1977. “A Critique of the Asset Pricing Theory’s Tests’ Part I: On Past and Po- tential Testability of the Theory.” Journal of Fi- nancial Economics. 4:2, pp. 129–76. Rosenberg, Barr, Kenneth Reid and Ronald Lanstein. 1985. “Persuasive Evidence of Market Inefficiency.” Journal of Portfolio Management. Spring, 11, pp. 9–17. Ross, Stephen A. 1976. “The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing.” Journal of Economic The- ory. 13:3, pp. 341–60. Sharpe, William F. 1964. “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Condi- tions of Risk.” Journal of Finance. 19:3, pp. 425– 42. Stambaugh, Robert F. 1982. “On The Exclu- sion of Assets from Tests of the Two-Parameter Model: A Sensitivity Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics. 10:3, pp. 237–68. Stattman, Dennis. 1980. “Book Values and Stock Returns.” The Chicago MBA: A Journal of Selected Papers. 4, pp. 25–45. Stein, Jeremy. 1996. “Rational Capital Budget- ing in an Irrational World.” Journal of Business. 69:4, pp. 429–55. Tobin, James. 1958. “Liquidity Preference as Behavior Toward Risk.” Review of Economic Stud- ies. 25:2, pp. 65–86. Vuolteenaho, Tuomo. 2002. “What Drives Firm Level Stock Returns?” Journal of Finance. 57:1, pp. 233–64. http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.2307%2F2296205&citationId=p_61 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.2307%2F2330365&citationId=p_53 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.2307%2F2975974&citationId=p_45 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1111%2F1540-6261.00421&citationId=p_62 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1016%2F0304-405X%2877%2990009-5&citationId=p_54 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1111%2Fj.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x&citationId=p_38 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.3905%2Fjpm.1985.409007&citationId=p_55 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.2307%2F1913811&citationId=p_47 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.2307%2F2325404&citationId=p_39 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1111%2Fj.1540-6261.1995.tb05171.x&citationId=p_40 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1016%2F0022-0531%2876%2990046-6&citationId=p_56 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1016%2F0378-4266%2886%2990023-3&citationId=p_41 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.2307%2F2977928&citationId=p_57 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1086%2F209645&citationId=p_49 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1111%2Fj.1540-6261.1994.tb04772.x&citationId=p_42 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1016%2F0304-405X%2882%2990002-2&citationId=p_58 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1111%2F0022-1082.00099&citationId=p_51 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.2307%2F1924119&citationId=p_43 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1086%2F209699&citationId=p_60 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/action/showLinks?crossref=10.1111%2Fj.1540-6261.1995.tb05166.x&citationId=p_44 This article has been cited by: 1. Tobias Kruse, Myra Mohnen, Misato Sato. 2024. Do Financial Markets Respond to Green Opportunities?. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 11:3, 549-576. [Crossref] 2. Wim Voordeckers, Maria J. Martinez-Romero, Alfonso A. Rojo-Ramirez. 2024. Family governance practices and the minimum required rate of return in privately held family firms. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 37. . [Crossref] 3. Marco Molteni. 2024. Competition, over‐branching and bank failures during the Great Depression: New evidence from Italy. The Economic History Review 910. . [Crossref] 4. John D. Foppert. 2024. The discount rate differential required for harvesting-by-dice-rolling to outperform optimal rotation planning. Forest Policy and Economics 160, 103154. [Crossref] 5. Aleksander Mercik, Tomasz Słoński, Marta Karaś. 2024. Understanding crypto-asset exposure: An investigation of its impact on performance and stock sensitivity among listed companies. International Review of Financial Analysis 92, 103070. [Crossref] 6. Jinghong Xu, Difan Guo, Zi’an Zhao, Shaoqiang Liu. 2024. How social media expedites the crisis spillover effect: A case study of Tesla's recall event. Public Relations Review 50:1, 102432. [Crossref] 7. Aso Abdullah, Sibel Yamak, Anna Korzhenitskaya, Roya Rahimi, Jeanette McClellan. 2024. Sustainable development: The role of sustainability committees in achieving ESG targets. Business Strategy and the Environment 33:3, 2250-2268. [Crossref] 8. Alfonso Guarino, Domenico Santoro,